Convenience · Shrinkage · Power BI · Head of IT

Head of IT: convenience shrinkage, read from Microsoft Power BI

Find the leak before it drains you. Ward runs it on Power BI data throughout your convenience footprint, scoped to technology.

Shrinkage Detection for Convenience on Power BI, scoped to technology

What shrinkage detection does: Ward identifies abnormal inventory loss patterns and distinguishes between theft, damage, spoilage, and administrative error.

Convenience & C-Store changes the scale of the problem: 3,000+ SKUs, every one of your locations. High-frequency, low-SKU environments where every facing counts. Ward monitors impulse categories and daypart demand patterns around the clock.

The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward filters to what a Head of IT can act on and drops the rest.

How Ward hands you Shrinkage findings: Ward compares expected inventory against actual counts, segments loss by cause category, and flags store-level anomalies against your estate baseline.

How the connection works. Ward connects to the same data sources Power BI uses. Or reads Power BI datasets via REST API. Your reports stay untouched.

Capabilities

  • Cause-level shrinkage attribution
  • Store-vs-estate benchmarking
  • Receiving dock anomaly detection
  • Pattern recognition across time
app.getward.ai Live demo
Acme Convenience @Store Ops: Regional Analyst claude-sonnet default
A

Chat

Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.

Why is the morning daypart down at the Route 9 sites?
You · 9:42 AM
Schema Scout · routed to Store Ops Agent

I pulled the 6–9a daypart for the 14 Route 9 sites against the chain baseline. Two causes, one of them scheduling.

SignalFinding
daypart_sales6–9a revenue −11% vs. chain, coffee units −18%
labor_schedulingSecond associate clocks in at 7:30a, peak starts 6:40a at 9 of 14 sites
foodservice.wasteBreakfast sandwich waste 14%, hold times past 4 hours at 6 sites

Recommend: move the second open to 6:15a at those nine sites, cut the breakfast batch by one tray, and re-check attach in two weeks.

7 parallel queries 3 sources cited confidence 0.91
Show me the schedule change by site.
You · 9:43 AM
Labor Agent · drafting shift diff
Querying daypart_sales
Ask anything, Ward routes to the right agent. Cmd+K

Reporting

Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.

7d13w52w
Inside-store sales
$12.9M
+2.4% WoW
Foodservice margin
47.3%
−2.1pp
Attach, fuel-to-store
31.2%
−1.6pp
Shrink, cigarettes
1.94%
+0.6pp
Inside-store sales 13 weeks actual, 6 weeks forecast, 80% interval
Actual Forecast 80% interval
% of plan 106 94 100 forecast → W−13 W−5 today +6wk
Holt-Winters + weather regressor MAPE 4.1% at 4wk Backtested 24 months Crosses plan in 3 weeks
Forecast error by horizon MAPE, 24-month backtest
1wk 2.1%
2wk 3.0%
4wk 4.1%
8wk 6.3%
13wk 8.9%
Accuracy bar for promo decisions: ≤5% at 4wk
Models in production Every forecast ships a model card
ModelHorizonMAPE
holt_winters4wk4.1%
arima_sarimax13wk8.9%
gbm_demand1wk2.1%
bayes_hiernew store11.4%

Sources

Connect external systems to the data lake.

NameTypeLast sync
ncr_pos_transactionsimport2m ago
pdi_fuel_transactionsimport2m ago
verifone_forecourt_eventsimport14m ago
ncr_planogram_auditimport1h ago
retail_daypart_salesimport1h ago
retail_foodservice_wasteimport1h ago
retail_labor_schedulingimport1h ago

Policies

Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.

TLS 1.3 AES-256 Read-only SOC 2 II
Policy IDEffectResources
ops-read-defaultpermitModel::*
lp-read-shrinkagepermitModel::"inventory_shrinkage"
vendor-blockedforbidModel::"labor_*"
fuel-team-forecourtpermitModel::"fuel_transactions"
Shrinkage for Convenience on Power BI data, live product demo.

Why Shrinkage matters for Convenience retail

C-store shrinkage is dominated by slow-bleed employee theft and scan avoidance, small per-transaction losses that compound across thousands of daily transactions. Ward monitors voids, no-sales, and scan-rate deviations, then correlates them with shift patterns and employee schedules to surface risk that audit cycles miss.

What Ward has eyes on.

The shrinkage model runs daily, not on a reporting calendar. It spots the pattern, attributes the cause, and attaches the next step before the number reaches a review deck.

Ward monitors 3,000+ SKUs across your locations, at the store-category level rather than the chain roll-up. The metrics under watch include transactions/hour, attach rate, basket size. A roll-up hides a single-store problem inside a healthy average, which is how daypart demand variation stays invisible for a quarter.

The connection to Microsoft Power BI is read-only and runs on your schedule. Ward reads power BI REST API datasets, underlying SQL/Azure data, and the rest of the feed, then cross-references it with external context your BI does not carry: weather, local events, competitor pricing.

At the metric level. Ward focuses on transaction anomaly rates (voids, no-sales, manual overrides), shift-correlated patterns, high-theft category velocity gaps, and receiving accuracy on high-value items, benchmarking each store against its own history and the estate average.

Signals · POS transaction-level data with employee, register, and shift attribution, vendor receiving logs, employee schedules, and (where available) video event metadata.

Why this combination
is its own problem.

A Head of IT in convenience retail owns numbers that move faster than the reporting cycle that covers them. Transactions/hour, attach rate, basket size shift store by store, each day. A monthly pack cannot represent that. The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture.

  • 01 Vendor-direct receiving for tobacco and beer happens outside the POS; shrink in those categories surfaces only at periodic counts.
  • 02 High-margin impulse items (candy, gum) get under-counted because shrink rates are reported as percentages of large category totals.

Benchmarks. C-store shrink runs 0.8-1.8% of inside-store sales, with tobacco and high-margin impulse categories driving disproportionate dollar loss. A small per-transaction void pattern (under $5) on tobacco can cost $15K-40K per store per year before it triggers traditional threshold alerts.

What the first 90 days
actually look like.

  1. 01

    Week 1: connect

    Read-only credentials to Microsoft Power BI. Ward reads straight from power BI REST API datasets, underlying SQL/Azure data, dataflow outputs and starts building baselines. First findings land inside 48 hours, before baselines are stable, so you can see the shape of the output early.

  2. 02

    Weeks 2 to 3: baselines

    Ward needs roughly two weeks of history per store to separate a real deviation from normal variance. During this window the daily cards are directionally right and the thresholds are still moving.

  3. 03

    Weeks 4 to 12: operating rhythm

    Insight cards arrive every morning and get triaged like any other queue. Most teams find the volume settles into something one person clears in ten minutes. What matters is the action rate, not the alert count.

How Ward connects to Microsoft Power BI

Ward sits alongside Power BI. Your dashboards visualize. Ward detects and explains what changed. No dashboard login needed for your morning brief.

Setup: Ward connects to the same data sources Power BI uses. Or reads Power BI datasets via REST API. Your reports stay untouched.

Data Ward reads from Power BI

Power BI REST API datasets
Underlying SQL/Azure data
Dataflow outputs

Impact metrics with Power BI

Time to Insight
Push, not pull
Insight cards delivered without waiting for someone to look.
Anomaly Detection
Between-refresh coverage
Issues surfaced before the next scheduled Power BI review.
Decision Velocity
Cause analysis included
No drill-down investigation; cards carry root cause context.
Report Efficiency
Ad-hoc requests reduced
Proactive cards answer questions before analysts get asked.

Data lake enrichment

Ward enriches Power BI data with: Power BI datasets, Underlying SQL/Azure data, Weather & events, Demographics, Custom feeds

The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture.

Pain points
  • ×Business sponsor already chose the vendor. You inherit the security review
  • ×Every AI vendor wants write access and a copy of the production data
  • ×Model lock-in means rewriting the stack when GPT or Claude moves again
  • ×Audit trail is an afterthought. Compliance has nothing to pull on
  • ×Data lake project keeps getting bumped for the next thing the business wants
How Ward helps
  • Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake
  • Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent
  • LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys
  • Every query, every model, every source logged. SIEM-ready audit output
  • VPC peering, PrivateLink, SOC 2 II. Your security review is short

74% of enterprise AI projects stall before production. Integration debt and security review are the top two reasons. Source: Gartner

Convenience KPI impact

Attach Rate
Impulse adjacencies
Daypart-specific cross-sell opportunities surfaced.
Daypart Revenue
Weak hours identified
Which hours and categories underperform, and why.
Planogram Compliance
Sales-correlated flags
Deviations flagged once they start costing revenue.
Shrinkage
Slow-bleed detection
Transaction-level anomalies that periodic audits miss.

Frequently asked questions

Ward identifies abnormal inventory loss patterns and distinguishes between theft, damage, spoilage, and administrative error. For Convenience retail specifically, Ward monitors 3,000+ SKUs across your locations and delivers automated insight cards with root cause analysis and recommended actions.

Ward tracks Transactions/hour, Attach rate, Basket size, Planogram compliance, Daypart mix at the store-category level. Ward compares expected inventory against actual counts, segments loss by cause category, and flags store-level anomalies against your estate baseline.

Ward connects to the same data sources Power BI uses. Or reads Power BI datasets via REST API. Your reports stay untouched. Data points include: Power BI REST API datasets, Underlying SQL/Azure data, Dataflow outputs.

Yes. Ward reads Power BI data and combines it with contextual signals (weather, events, demographics) to generate Convenience-specific insight cards. No custom development required.

The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake. Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent. LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys.

Ward delivers daily insight cards covering Transactions/hour, Attach rate, Basket size, tailored for Technology decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.

Ward focuses on transaction anomaly rates (voids, no-sales, manual overrides), shift-correlated patterns, high-theft category velocity gaps, and receiving accuracy on high-value items, benchmarking each store against its own history and the estate average.

Ward flags multiple locations with a consistent pattern: tobacco void rates spike during a specific overnight shift window. The amounts are small enough to evade threshold-based alerts but consistent enough to represent significant annual loss per store. Ward attributes the pattern to specific shift schedules, and investigation confirms scan avoidance by a ring of night-shift employees across the affected stores.

First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.

No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.

See what Convenience shrinkage problems Ward catches.

Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.

Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly

Find out what your data has been hiding.

Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.

Step 1 of 3
What are your goals?
Step 2 of 3
About your operation
Step 3 of 3
Your contact info