Convenience shrinkage, briefed to supply chain
You find out about stockouts after customers do. Ward scans continuously shrinkage across 3,000+ convenience SKUs and hands back the supply chain read daily.
Shrinkage Detection on a convenience fleet, scoped to supply chain
Shrinkage Detection, in one sentence. Ward identifies abnormal inventory loss patterns and distinguishes between theft, damage, spoilage, and administrative error.
Convenience & C-Store changes the scale of the problem: 3,000+ SKUs, every one of your locations. High-frequency, low-SKU environments where every facing counts. Ward monitors impulse categories and daypart demand patterns around the clock.
You find out about stockouts after customers do. Ward pulls forward the inputs that change a supply chain decision.
The mechanism. Ward compares expected inventory against actual counts, segments loss by cause category, and flags store-level anomalies against your estate baseline.
The short list
- Store-vs-estate benchmarking
- Receiving dock anomaly detection
- Pattern recognition across time
- Cause-level shrinkage attribution
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled the 6–9a daypart for the 14 Route 9 sites against the chain baseline. Two causes, one of them scheduling.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
daypart_sales | 6–9a revenue −11% vs. chain, coffee units −18% |
labor_scheduling | Second associate clocks in at 7:30a, peak starts 6:40a at 9 of 14 sites |
foodservice.waste | Breakfast sandwich waste 14%, hold times past 4 hours at 6 sites |
Recommend: move the second open to 6:15a at those nine sites, cut the breakfast batch by one tray, and re-check attach in two weeks.
daypart_sales…
Reporting
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.
| Model | Horizon | MAPE |
|---|---|---|
holt_winters | 4wk | 4.1% |
arima_sarimax | 13wk | 8.9% |
gbm_demand | 1wk | 2.1% |
bayes_hier | new store | 11.4% |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
ncr_pos_transactions | import | 2m ago |
pdi_fuel_transactions | import | 2m ago |
verifone_forecourt_events | import | 14m ago |
ncr_planogram_audit | import | 1h ago |
retail_daypart_sales | import | 1h ago |
retail_foodservice_waste | import | 1h ago |
retail_labor_scheduling | import | 1h ago |
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
ops-read-default | permit | Model::* |
lp-read-shrinkage | permit | Model::"inventory_shrinkage" |
vendor-blocked | forbid | Model::"labor_*" |
fuel-team-forecourt | permit | Model::"fuel_transactions" |
Why Shrinkage matters for Convenience retail
C-store shrinkage is dominated by slow-bleed employee theft and scan avoidance, small per-transaction losses that compound across thousands of daily transactions. Ward monitors voids, no-sales, and scan-rate deviations, then correlates them with shift patterns and employee schedules to surface risk that audit cycles miss.
Why this combination
is its own problem.
A generic shrinkage model applied to a convenience estate produces alerts nobody trusts. The thresholds are wrong, because convenience baselines are wrong for it. Ward learns the baseline from your own locations instead of importing one.
- 01 High-margin impulse items (candy, gum) get under-counted because shrink rates are reported as percentages of large category totals.
- 02 Threshold-based void alerts catch high-dollar individual events but miss the coordinated small-dollar pattern that adds up to the real loss.
Benchmarks. C-store shrink runs 0.8-1.8% of inside-store sales, with tobacco and high-margin impulse categories driving disproportionate dollar loss. A small per-transaction void pattern (under $5) on tobacco can cost $15K-40K per store per year before it triggers traditional threshold alerts.
What Ward has eyes on.
Every one of your locations gets its own baseline. Ward tracks transactions/hour, attach rate, basket size against it and raises only the deviations that hold up. The two that show up most in convenience retail are daypart demand variation and planogram compliance, and both are baseline problems before they are P&L problems.
The shrinkage model runs on a daily cycle, not on a reporting calendar. It spots the pattern, explains the driver, and attaches a recommended move before the number reaches a review deck.
At the metric level. Ward focuses on transaction anomaly rates (voids, no-sales, manual overrides), shift-correlated patterns, high-theft category velocity gaps, and receiving accuracy on high-value items, benchmarking each store against its own history and the estate average.
What the first 90 days
actually look like.
-
01
Week 1: read-only connection
Ward reads your existing systems on a read-only connection. Nothing is written back. First cards arrive inside the first 48 hours.
-
02
Weeks 2 to 3: baselines
Ward needs roughly two weeks of history per store to separate a real deviation from normal variance. During this window the cards are directionally right and the thresholds are still moving.
-
03
Weeks 4 to 12: steady state
Ward delivers daily cards on a daily cycle, each with the cause and a recommended action. Volume settles at a level a single person can read over coffee. The measure of success is not how many insight cards arrive, it is how many get acted on.
You find out about stockouts after customers do.
- ×Demand forecasts are off by 15-25% and nobody catches it until the shelf is empty
- ×Supplier fill rate problems announce themselves at the receiving dock
- ×Safety stock levels get set once a year and left alone
- ×No early warning system for supply chain disruptions
- ×Replenishment exceptions require manual triage every morning
- ✓Stockout prediction cards arrive 24-72 hours before empty shelves
- ✓Supplier fill rate tracking with automatic escalation
- ✓Dynamic safety stock recommendations based on current demand signals
- ✓Weather, event, and macro-driven demand adjustments
- ✓Replenishment exceptions auto-prioritized by revenue impact
Stockouts cost retailers $1.14 trillion in missed sales globally each year. Source: IHL Group
Convenience KPI impact
Frequently asked questions
Ward identifies abnormal inventory loss patterns and distinguishes between theft, damage, spoilage, and administrative error. For Convenience retail specifically, Ward monitors 3,000+ SKUs across your locations and delivers automated insight cards with root cause analysis and recommended actions.
Ward tracks Transactions/hour, Attach rate, Basket size, Planogram compliance, Daypart mix at the store-category level. Ward compares expected inventory against actual counts, segments loss by cause category, and flags store-level anomalies against your estate baseline.
You find out about stockouts after customers do. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Stockout prediction cards arrive 24-72 hours before empty shelves. Supplier fill rate tracking with automatic escalation. Dynamic safety stock recommendations based on current demand signals.
Ward delivers daily insight cards covering Transactions/hour, Attach rate, Basket size, tailored for Supply Chain decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.
Ward focuses on transaction anomaly rates (voids, no-sales, manual overrides), shift-correlated patterns, high-theft category velocity gaps, and receiving accuracy on high-value items, benchmarking each store against its own history and the estate average.
Ward flags multiple locations with a consistent pattern: tobacco void rates spike during a specific overnight shift window. The amounts are small enough to evade threshold-based alerts but consistent enough to represent significant annual loss per store. Ward attributes the pattern to specific shift schedules, and investigation confirms scan avoidance by a ring of night-shift employees across the affected stores.
First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.
No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.
Related solutions
See what Convenience shrinkage problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.