Head of Procurement: fashion shrinkage, read from BigCommerce
Find the leak before it drains you. Ward runs it on BigCommerce data throughout your fashion fleet, scoped to procurement.
Shrinkage Detection for Fashion on BigCommerce, scoped to procurement
Here is shrinkage detection in plain terms. Ward identifies abnormal inventory loss patterns and distinguishes between theft, damage, spoilage, and administrative error.
For Fashion & Apparel retailers, that means watching 15,000+ SKUs over locations. Seasonal sell-through, size curve optimization, and markdown timing. Ward monitors style velocity and flags slow movers before the window closes.
Merchandising wants Ward. You sign the contract. Ward delivers insight cards scoped to procurement decision-making.
The mechanism. Ward compares expected inventory against actual counts, segments loss by cause category, and flags store-level anomalies against your estate baseline.
Getting the data in. Ward connects via BigCommerce REST API with OAuth. Webhooks for real-time order and inventory events.
Key capabilities
- Store-vs-estate benchmarking
- Receiving dock anomaly detection
- Pattern recognition across time
- Cause-level shrinkage attribution
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled fall denim against last season’s curve at the same selling week. Two causes, both still fixable this week.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
sell_through | Week 6 sell-through 38% vs. 52% plan, concentrated in 3 of 9 door clusters |
size_curve | Waist 30–32 sold out in 41 doors while 36–38 sits at 71% on hand |
markdown.ladder | First markdown is 3 weeks later than LY, weeks-of-supply now 11.4 |
Recommend: transfer 30–32 out of the 12 overstocked doors, hold the ladder on core indigo, and take the first markdown on light wash now while it still clears at 20%.
sell_through_weekly…
Reporting
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.
| Model | Horizon | MAPE |
|---|---|---|
holt_winters | 4wk | 4.1% |
arima_sarimax | 13wk | 8.9% |
gbm_demand | 1wk | 2.1% |
bayes_hier | new store | 11.4% |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
shopify_orders_daily | import | 2m ago |
shopify_returns_reasons | import | 2m ago |
netsuite_inventory_snapshot | import | 14m ago |
cegid_store_sales | import | 1h ago |
retail_size_curve_actuals | import | 1h ago |
retail_markdown_ladder | import | 1h ago |
retail_ga4_website_daily | import | 1h ago |
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
merch-read-default | permit | Model::* |
finance-read-markdown | permit | Model::"markdown_ladder" |
vendor-blocked | forbid | Model::"labor_*" |
ecom-read-returns | permit | Model::"returns_reasons" |
Why Shrinkage matters for Fashion retail
The biggest hidden source of fashion shrinkage isn't theft, it's administrative error in transfer-heavy operations where every handoff between stores, e-commerce, and returns is a reconciliation risk. Ward tracks inventory movements across all channels and distinguishes transfer discrepancies from return fraud and genuine theft.
Why this combination
is its own problem.
A Head of Procurement in fashion retail owns numbers that move faster than the reporting cycle that covers them. Sell-through rate, markdown %, return rate shift store by store, every morning. A monthly pack cannot represent that. Merchandising wants Ward. You sign the contract.
- 01 BOPIS and ship-from-store create double-counted inventory in the OMS that disappears on the next reconciliation as "shrink".
- 02 Return fraud and wardrobing get logged as legitimate returns because store associates lack the data to challenge them in real time.
Benchmarks. Fashion shrink runs 1.4-2.5% of sales, with returns/wardrobing in premium tiers contributing 0.4-0.8% of that. High-value categories (handbags, outerwear, premium denim) account for 40-60% of total dollar shrink despite being 10-20% of unit volume.
What Ward has eyes on.
Every one of your locations gets its own baseline. Ward keeps a running read on sell-through rate, markdown %, return rate against it and brings up only the deviations that hold up. The two that show up most in fashion retail are markdown timing and size curve misallocation, and both are baseline problems before they are P&L problems.
Ward reads orders, products & variants, customers from BigCommerce on a read-only connection. Nothing is written back, and your Commerce configuration does not change. BigCommerce stays the system of record.
Find the leak before it drains you. Ward runs the model continuously rather than on a reporting cycle, which is why a finding lands the morning the pattern starts instead of at the end of the period.
At the metric level. Ward tracks transfer accuracy rates, return-to-sale ratios, inter-store reconciliation gaps, and high-value item movement patterns. Separating operational shrinkage from intentional loss is essential because the interventions are completely different.
What the first 90 days
actually look like.
-
01
Week 1: connect
Read-only credentials to BigCommerce. Ward pulls from orders, products & variants, customers and starts building baselines. First cards land inside 48 hours, before baselines are stable, so you can see the shape of the output early.
-
02
Weeks 2 to 3: baselines
Ward needs roughly two weeks of history per store to separate a real deviation from normal variance. During this window the cards are directionally right and the thresholds are still moving.
-
03
Weeks 4 to 12: operating rhythm
Findings arrive every morning and get triaged like any other queue. Most teams find the volume settles into something one person clears in ten minutes. What matters is the action rate, not the alert count.
How Ward connects to BigCommerce
Ward connects to BigCommerce for omnichannel retailers running headless or traditional storefronts. Orders, catalog, and customer data drive insight cards.
Setup: Ward connects via BigCommerce REST API with OAuth. Webhooks for real-time order and inventory events.
Data Ward reads from BigCommerce
Impact metrics with BigCommerce
Data lake enrichment
Ward enriches BigCommerce data with: Orders & variants, Customer behavior, Marketing data, Returns & exchanges, Competitor pricing
Merchandising wants Ward. You sign the contract.
- ×Business sponsor saw the demo. You have a week to vet a vendor you didn't pick
- ×AI vendors price by seats and tokens. Total cost is unknowable until invoice three
- ×Multi-year commits with auto-renew. No exit if the pilot stalls
- ×Renewals come back 30% higher, with no room to push back and no benchmark to cite
- ×Security and DPA reviews start after the team has already committed
- ✓MSA, DPA, SOC 2 Type II underway, and architecture review available before signature
- ✓Month-to-month contracts. No multi-year lock-in. No auto-renew traps
- ✓Transparent pricing set by scope and store count
- ✓14-day insight guarantee. If Ward doesn't deliver, month two is on us
- ✓AI strategy, orchestration and reporting-layer work in enterprise grocery at nine-figure revenue. Reference calls available before signature
Enterprise SaaS spend grew 18% YoY. 53% of subscriptions are underused or duplicative. Source: Gartner
Fashion KPI impact
Frequently asked questions
Ward identifies abnormal inventory loss patterns and distinguishes between theft, damage, spoilage, and administrative error. For Fashion retail specifically, Ward monitors 15,000+ SKUs across your locations and delivers automated insight cards with root cause analysis and recommended actions.
Ward tracks Sell-through rate, Markdown %, Return rate, Style velocity, Size accuracy at the store-category level. Ward compares expected inventory against actual counts, segments loss by cause category, and flags store-level anomalies against your estate baseline.
Ward connects via BigCommerce REST API with OAuth. Webhooks for real-time order and inventory events. Data points include: Orders, Products & variants, Customers, Inventory, Promotions, Storefront analytics.
Yes. Ward reads BigCommerce data and combines it with contextual signals (weather, events, demographics) to generate Fashion-specific insight cards. No custom development required.
Merchandising wants Ward. You sign the contract. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: MSA, DPA, SOC 2 Type II underway, and architecture review available before signature. Month-to-month contracts. No multi-year lock-in. No auto-renew traps. Transparent pricing set by scope and store count.
Ward delivers daily insight cards covering Sell-through rate, Markdown %, Return rate, tailored for Procurement decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.
Ward tracks transfer accuracy rates, return-to-sale ratios, inter-store reconciliation gaps, and high-value item movement patterns. Separating operational shrinkage from intentional loss is essential because the interventions are completely different.
Ward flags a cluster of stores where high-value item returns run well above estate average, most without original tags, with the same payment cards appearing across multiple locations. The pattern matches a wardrobing ring. LP adjusts the return policy for flagged categories and sees a significant drop in high-value returns within weeks.
First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.
No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.
Related solutions
See what Fashion shrinkage problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.