Fill Rate · Snowflake · Head of LP

Fill Rate Monitoring for Head of Loss Prevention, read from Snowflake

Every empty shelf is a lost sale. Ward runs it off Snowflake, scoped to what a Head of LP owns.

How a Head of LP runs fill rate off Snowflake

Shrinkage costs you more than you think. Ward finds out where. Ward filters to what a Head of LP can act on and drops the rest.

Fill Rate Monitoring. Ward monitors on-shelf availability across your entire estate and flags stores or categories dropping below threshold.

Under the hood. Ward tracks expected vs actual on-shelf availability at the store-category level and escalates when fill rate drops below configurable thresholds.

Getting the data in. Ward connects via Snowflake SQL API with key-pair authentication. Read-only warehouse. Your data never leaves Snowflake.

What you get

  • Threshold-based alerting
  • Store-vs-estate benchmarking
  • Category-level drill-down
  • Estate-wide fill rate dashboard
app.getward.ai Live demo
Acme Retail @Merchandising: VP Analyst claude-sonnet default
A

Chat

Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.

Why did Store 37 miss target last week?
You · 9:42 AM
Schema Scout · routed to Merchandising Agent

I pulled Store 37’s last 28 days against the chain baseline. Two root causes, both compounding.

SignalFinding
labor_efficiencyRev/labor-hour −22% vs. cluster, staffing mismatch at 11a–1p peak
inventory.freshFresh fill 83%, backroom replenishment lag at 2–4p
promo.liftBOGO crackers cannibalized Brand Y by 28%, net category +6%

Recommend: re-baseline Store 37 schedule against true peak, raise replen window to 1p, and review the BOGO before next cycle.

8 parallel queries 3 sources cited confidence 0.92
Show me how to fix the staffing mismatch.
You · 9:43 AM
Labor Agent · drafting schedule diff
Querying labor_scheduling
Ask anything, Ward routes to the right agent. Cmd+K

Reporting

Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.

7d13w52w
Revenue vs. forecast
$48.2M
+4.2% WoW
Gross margin %
24.1%
−3.2pp
Fill rate, fresh
83.4%
−4.1pp
Shrink, West region
2.41%
+0.8pp
Revenue vs. forecast 13 weeks actual, 6 weeks forecast, 80% interval
Actual Forecast 80% interval
% of plan 106 94 100 forecast → W−13 W−5 today +6wk
Holt-Winters + weather regressor MAPE 4.1% at 4wk Backtested 24 months Crosses plan in 3 weeks
Forecast error by horizon MAPE, 24-month backtest
1wk 2.1%
2wk 3.0%
4wk 4.1%
8wk 6.3%
13wk 8.9%
Accuracy bar for promo decisions: ≤5% at 4wk
Models in production Every forecast ships a model card
ModelHorizonMAPE
holt_winters4wk4.1%
arima_sarimax13wk8.9%
gbm_demand1wk2.1%
bayes_hiernew store11.4%

Sources

Connect external systems to the data lake.

NameTypeLast sync
sap_pos_transactionsimport2m ago
sap_inventory_shrinkageimport2m ago
sap_labor_schedulingimport14m ago
retail_inventory_weeklyimport1h ago
retail_google_ads_dailyimport1h ago
retail_meta_ads_dailyimport1h ago
retail_ga4_website_dailyimport1h ago

Policies

Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.

TLS 1.3 AES-256 Read-only SOC 2 II
Policy IDEffectResources
merch-read-defaultpermitModel::*
finance-read-shrinkagepermitModel::"inventory_shrinkage"
vendor-blockedforbidModel::"labor_*"
region-west-onlypermitTenant::"acme"
Fill Rate on Snowflake data, live product demo.

Why this combination
is its own problem.

Most fill rate projects stall at data access. This one does not, because Snowflake already exposes any table or view in your Snowflake account, cross-database joins, historical data at any depth through an API Ward reads directly.

What Ward has eyes on.

The fill rate model runs each day, not on a reporting calendar. It picks up the pattern, explains the driver, and attaches what to do about it before the number reaches a review deck.

Ward pulls from Snowflake rather than replacing it. Any table or view in your Snowflake account, cross-database joins, historical data at any depth come across on a read-only connection, get enriched with contextual data, and come back as insight cards. Your Data Platform is untouched.

What the first 90 days
actually look like.

  1. 01

    Week 1: read-only connection

    Ward reads from Snowflake with read-only credentials and begins ingesting any table or view in your Snowflake account and cross-database joins. No config changes on your side. First insight cards arrive within 48 hours.

  2. 02

    Weeks 2 to 3: baselines

    Ward needs roughly two weeks of history per store to separate a real deviation from normal variance. During this window the daily cards are directionally right and the thresholds are still moving.

  3. 03

    Weeks 4 to 12: steady state

    Ward sends insight cards each day, each with what caused it and a recommended move. Volume settles at a level a single person can read over coffee. The measure of success is not how many cards arrive, it is how many get acted on.

How Ward connects to Snowflake

Ward queries your Snowflake data warehouse directly. If your retail data lives in Snowflake, Ward reads it without moving or copying anything.

Setup: Ward connects via Snowflake SQL API with key-pair authentication. Read-only warehouse. Your data never leaves Snowflake.

Data Ward reads from Snowflake

Any table or view in your Snowflake account
Cross-database joins
Historical data at any depth

Impact metrics with Snowflake

Time to Insight
Zero-copy, zero-ETL
Queries run against existing warehouse tables directly.
Forecast Accuracy
Enrichment joins added
Weather, events, and demographics joined to Snowflake tables.
Data Utilization
Dormant tables activated
Unused warehouse data brought into cross-domain analysis.
Anomaly Detection Speed
Continuous monitoring
Deviations caught days before scheduled reports surface them.

Data lake enrichment

Ward enriches Snowflake data with: Any Snowflake table, Weather & events, Demographics, Competitor data, Custom feeds

Shrinkage costs you more than you think. Ward finds out where.

Pain points
  • ×Shrinkage lands as a year-end surprise
  • ×Cannot distinguish theft from spoilage from admin error
  • ×High-shrinkage stores only identified during audits
  • ×No correlation between operational changes and loss patterns
  • ×Exception-based reporting misses slow-bleed patterns
How Ward helps
  • Store-level shrinkage tracking with cause attribution
  • Anomaly detection flags stores deviating from estate average
  • Receiving dock discrepancy patterns identified automatically
  • Correlation analysis links operational changes to loss shifts
  • Trend analysis catches slow-bleed patterns audits miss

US retail shrinkage hit $112.1 billion in 2022. Up 19.4% year over year. Source: National Retail Federation

Frequently asked questions

Ward connects via Snowflake SQL API with key-pair authentication. Read-only warehouse. Your data never leaves Snowflake. Data points include: Any table or view in your Snowflake account, Cross-database joins, Historical data at any depth.

Shrinkage costs you more than you think. Ward finds out where. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Store-level shrinkage tracking with cause attribution. Anomaly detection flags stores deviating from estate average. Receiving dock discrepancy patterns identified automatically.

First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.

No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.

See what fill rate problems Ward catches.

Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.

Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly

Find out what your data has been hiding.

Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.

Step 1 of 3
What are your goals?
Step 2 of 3
About your operation
Step 3 of 3
Your contact info