Head of E-Com: fill rate straight off Tableau
Your online and offline data live in different worlds. Ward catches fill rate movement in your Tableau data and explains what caused it.
How a Head of E-Com runs fill rate off Tableau
Your online and offline data live in different worlds. Ward filters to what a Head of E-Com can act on and drops the rest.
Fill Rate Monitoring, in one sentence. Ward monitors on-shelf availability across your entire estate and flags stores or categories dropping below threshold.
The mechanism. Ward tracks expected vs actual on-shelf availability at the store-category level and escalates when fill rate drops below configurable thresholds.
Setup: Ward connects to the same databases Tableau uses. Or reads Tableau Server metadata via REST API for context.
Capabilities
- Threshold-based alerting
- Store-vs-estate benchmarking
- Category-level drill-down
- Estate-wide fill rate dashboard
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled Store 37’s last 28 days against the chain baseline. Two root causes, both compounding.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
labor_efficiency | Rev/labor-hour −22% vs. cluster, staffing mismatch at 11a–1p peak |
inventory.fresh | Fresh fill 83%, backroom replenishment lag at 2–4p |
promo.lift | BOGO crackers cannibalized Brand Y by 28%, net category +6% |
Recommend: re-baseline Store 37 schedule against true peak, raise replen window to 1p, and review the BOGO before next cycle.
labor_scheduling…
Reporting
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.
| Model | Horizon | MAPE |
|---|---|---|
holt_winters | 4wk | 4.1% |
arima_sarimax | 13wk | 8.9% |
gbm_demand | 1wk | 2.1% |
bayes_hier | new store | 11.4% |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
sap_pos_transactions | import | 2m ago |
sap_inventory_shrinkage | import | 2m ago |
sap_labor_scheduling | import | 14m ago |
retail_inventory_weekly | import | 1h ago |
retail_google_ads_daily | import | 1h ago |
retail_meta_ads_daily | import | 1h ago |
retail_ga4_website_daily | import | 1h ago |
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
merch-read-default | permit | Model::* |
finance-read-shrinkage | permit | Model::"inventory_shrinkage" |
vendor-blocked | forbid | Model::"labor_*" |
region-west-only | permit | Tenant::"acme" |
What Ward has eyes on.
The connection to Tableau is read-only and runs on your schedule. Ward reads tableau Hyper extracts, underlying database (direct), and the rest of the feed, then stitches together it with external context your BI does not carry: weather, local events, competitor pricing.
Every empty shelf is a lost sale. Ward runs the model continuously rather than on a reporting cycle, which is why a finding lands the morning the pattern starts instead of at the end of the period.
Why this combination
is its own problem.
Fill Rate Monitoring needs tableau Hyper extracts and underlying database (direct) at minimum. Tableau carries both, at the grain the model needs. That is the whole integration story: no middleware, no staging warehouse, no custom extract.
What the first 90 days
actually look like.
-
01
Week 1: read-only connection
Ward connects to Tableau with read-only credentials and begins ingesting tableau Hyper extracts and underlying database (direct). No config changes on your side. First cards arrive within 48 hours.
-
02
Weeks 2 to 3: baselines
Ward needs roughly two weeks of history per store to separate a real deviation from normal variance. During this window the daily cards are directionally right and the thresholds are still moving.
-
03
Weeks 4 to 12: steady state
Ward returns insight cards daily, each with the cause and the next step. Volume settles at a level a single person can read over coffee. The measure of success is not how many cards arrive, it is how many get acted on.
How Ward connects to Tableau
Ward does not replace Tableau. Ward adds the proactive layer Tableau lacks. When a metric moves, Ward explains why and recommends action.
Setup: Ward connects to the same databases Tableau uses. Or reads Tableau Server metadata via REST API for context.
Data Ward reads from Tableau
Impact metrics with Tableau
Data lake enrichment
Ward enriches Tableau data with: Tableau data sources, Underlying database, Weather & events, Competitor pricing, Customer data
Your online and offline data live in different worlds.
- ×Nobody can see one inventory position across every channel
- ×Online promo performance is measured separately from in-store
- ×Customer behavior data is siloed by channel
- ×BOPIS/BORIS operational complexity is growing unchecked
- ×Digital marketing attribution stops at the click
- ✓Unified insight cards across online and in-store channels
- ✓Cross-channel promo effectiveness with true attribution
- ✓Customer journey tracking across digital and physical touchpoints
- ✓BOPIS fulfillment performance monitoring with exception cards
- ✓Full-funnel marketing attribution to in-store conversion
Retailers with unified omnichannel data see 30% higher lifetime value per customer. Source: Harvard Business Review
Frequently asked questions
Ward connects to the same databases Tableau uses. Or reads Tableau Server metadata via REST API for context. Data points include: Tableau Hyper extracts, Underlying database (direct), Published data source metadata.
Your online and offline data live in different worlds. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Unified insight cards across online and in-store channels. Cross-channel promo effectiveness with true attribution. Customer journey tracking across digital and physical touchpoints.
First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.
No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.
Related solutions
See what fill rate problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.