What a furniture Head of IT pulls out of SAP
Ward pulls from SAP Retail and delivers furniture insight cards scoped to technology. The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture.
What a furniture Head of IT gets from SAP Retail
A Furniture Manufacturing & Retail operator is continuous review 10,000+ SKUs across locations. ERP-locked production data, long lead times, and margin erosion you don't see until quarter-end. Ward connects your internal systems and surfaces what matters.
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward filters to what a Head of IT can act on and drops the rest.
How the connection works. Ward reads from SAP via RFC/BAPI or OData APIs. No changes to your SAP configuration. Read-only access. Data syncs on your schedule.
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled upholstery cost of goods by BOM line against the last price file. Three quarters of the drop is material and freight, not discounting.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
bom_cost_actuals | Foam and frame stock +9.2% since the March price file, never carried to list |
freight.inbound | Inbound container cost +$412 per unit-equivalent on the Vietnam lane |
channel.mix | Wholesale share up 6pp, and wholesale runs 11pp under DTC margin |
Recommend: reprice the six affected SKUs at the next list cycle, quote the alternate foam vendor, and hold wholesale allocation flat until list catches up.
bom_cost_actuals…
Reporting
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.
| Model | Horizon | MAPE |
|---|---|---|
holt_winters | 4wk | 4.1% |
arima_sarimax | 13wk | 8.9% |
gbm_demand | 1wk | 2.1% |
bayes_hier | new store | 11.4% |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
epicor_production_stage_log | import | 2m ago |
epicor_bom_cost_actuals | import | 2m ago |
sap_inventory_snapshot | import | 14m ago |
netsuite_sales_orders | import | 1h ago |
retail_showroom_pos | import | 1h ago |
retail_freight_inbound | import | 1h ago |
retail_dealer_orders | import | 1h ago |
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
finance-read-default | permit | Model::* |
sourcing-read-bom | permit | Model::"bom_cost_actuals" |
dealer-blocked | forbid | Model::"bom_*" |
plant-read-production | permit | Model::"production_stage_log" |
What Ward delivers
- Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake
- Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent
- LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys
- Every query, every model, every source logged. SIEM-ready audit output
- VPC peering, PrivateLink, SOC 2 II. Your security review is short
Metrics Ward monitors
Furniture challenges Ward solves
- Disconnected ERP, warehouse, and POS systems
- Custom/configurable SKUs that break standard reporting
- 8–16 week lead times with no demand signal
- Raw material cost drift invisible until P&L close
- Channel mix shift between showroom, e-commerce, and wholesale
What Ward has eyes on.
Every one of your locations gets its own baseline. Ward monitors inventory carrying cost, order-to-delivery cycle, gross margin by channel against it and raises only the deviations that hold up. The two that show up most in furniture retail are disconnected ERP, warehouse, and POS systems and custom/configurable SKUs that break standard reporting, and both are baseline problems before they are P&L problems.
The connection to SAP Retail is read-only and runs on your schedule. Ward reads straight from POS transactions, inventory positions, and the rest of the feed, then combines it with external context your ERP does not carry: weather, local events, competitor pricing.
Why this combination
is its own problem.
The technology problem in furniture retail is not missing data. It is that inventory carrying cost, order-to-delivery cycle, gross margin by channel live in different systems on different refresh schedules, and reconciling them is a person-week. Ward does the reconciliation and sends the two-line version.
What the first 90 days
actually look like.
-
01
Week 1: read-only connection
Ward connects to SAP Retail with read-only credentials and begins ingesting POS transactions and inventory positions. No config changes on your side. First cards arrive inside the first 48 hours.
-
02
Weeks 2 to 3: baselines
Ward needs roughly two weeks of history per store to separate a real deviation from normal variance. During this window the cards are directionally right and the thresholds are still moving.
-
03
Weeks 4 to 12: operating rhythm
Daily cards arrive each day and get triaged like any other queue. Most teams find the volume settles into something one person clears in ten minutes. What matters is the action rate, not the alert count.
How Ward connects to SAP Retail
Ward connects to SAP Retail (S/4HANA, ECC, CAR) via standard BAPIs and IDocs. Transaction data, inventory positions, and master data flow into Ward without custom development.
Setup: Ward reads from SAP via RFC/BAPI or OData APIs. No changes to your SAP configuration. Read-only access. Data syncs on your schedule.
Data Ward reads from SAP
Impact metrics with SAP
Data lake enrichment
Ward enriches SAP data with: POS transactions, Weather & events, Competitor pricing, Loyalty & CRM, Supplier fill rates
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture.
- ×Business sponsor already chose the vendor. You inherit the security review
- ×Every AI vendor wants write access and a copy of the production data
- ×Model lock-in means rewriting the stack when GPT or Claude moves again
- ×Audit trail is an afterthought. Compliance has nothing to pull on
- ×Data lake project keeps getting bumped for the next thing the business wants
- ✓Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake
- ✓Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent
- ✓LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys
- ✓Every query, every model, every source logged. SIEM-ready audit output
- ✓VPC peering, PrivateLink, SOC 2 II. Your security review is short
74% of enterprise AI projects stall before production. Integration debt and security review are the top two reasons. Source: Gartner
Furniture KPI impact
Frequently asked questions
Ward reads from SAP via RFC/BAPI or OData APIs. No changes to your SAP configuration. Read-only access. Data syncs on your schedule. Data points include: POS transactions, Inventory positions, Purchase orders, Material master, Vendor master, Promotion calendar.
Yes. Ward reads SAP data and combines it with contextual signals (weather, events, demographics) to generate Furniture-specific insight cards. No custom development required.
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake. Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent. LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys.
Ward delivers daily insight cards covering Inventory carrying cost, Order-to-delivery cycle, Gross margin by channel, tailored for Technology decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.
First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.
No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.
Related solutions
See what Furniture problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.