Pricing · Looker · CFO

Price Optimization on Looker, for finance

Your P&L surprises are born on the store floor. Ward spots pricing movement in your Looker data and attributes what caused it.

Price Optimization on Looker, for finance

Your P&L surprises are born on the store floor. Ward writes the finding at the altitude a CFO works at.

Price Optimization. Ward monitors price elasticity shifts in real time and recommends adjustments that protect margin without sacrificing volume.

How Ward sends Pricing cards: Ward continuously measures price elasticity by category, tracks competitive pricing signals, and models the margin-volume tradeoff.

Setup: Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.

What you get

  • Category-level price sensitivity
  • Competitive price monitoring
  • Margin-volume tradeoff modeling
  • Real-time elasticity measurement
app.getward.ai Live demo
Acme Retail @Merchandising: VP Analyst claude-sonnet default
A

Chat

Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.

Why did Store 37 miss target last week?
You · 9:42 AM
Schema Scout · routed to Merchandising Agent

I pulled Store 37’s last 28 days against the chain baseline. Two root causes, both compounding.

SignalFinding
labor_efficiencyRev/labor-hour −22% vs. cluster, staffing mismatch at 11a–1p peak
inventory.freshFresh fill 83%, backroom replenishment lag at 2–4p
promo.liftBOGO crackers cannibalized Brand Y by 28%, net category +6%

Recommend: re-baseline Store 37 schedule against true peak, raise replen window to 1p, and review the BOGO before next cycle.

8 parallel queries 3 sources cited confidence 0.92
Show me how to fix the staffing mismatch.
You · 9:43 AM
Labor Agent · drafting schedule diff
Querying labor_scheduling
Ask anything, Ward routes to the right agent. Cmd+K

Reporting

Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.

7d13w52w
Revenue vs. forecast
$48.2M
+4.2% WoW
Gross margin %
24.1%
−3.2pp
Fill rate, fresh
83.4%
−4.1pp
Shrink, West region
2.41%
+0.8pp
Revenue vs. forecast 13 weeks actual, 6 weeks forecast, 80% interval
Actual Forecast 80% interval
% of plan 106 94 100 forecast → W−13 W−5 today +6wk
Holt-Winters + weather regressor MAPE 4.1% at 4wk Backtested 24 months Crosses plan in 3 weeks
Forecast error by horizon MAPE, 24-month backtest
1wk 2.1%
2wk 3.0%
4wk 4.1%
8wk 6.3%
13wk 8.9%
Accuracy bar for promo decisions: ≤5% at 4wk
Models in production Every forecast ships a model card
ModelHorizonMAPE
holt_winters4wk4.1%
arima_sarimax13wk8.9%
gbm_demand1wk2.1%
bayes_hiernew store11.4%

Sources

Connect external systems to the data lake.

NameTypeLast sync
sap_pos_transactionsimport2m ago
sap_inventory_shrinkageimport2m ago
sap_labor_schedulingimport14m ago
retail_inventory_weeklyimport1h ago
retail_google_ads_dailyimport1h ago
retail_meta_ads_dailyimport1h ago
retail_ga4_website_dailyimport1h ago

Policies

Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.

TLS 1.3 AES-256 Read-only SOC 2 II
Policy IDEffectResources
merch-read-defaultpermitModel::*
finance-read-shrinkagepermitModel::"inventory_shrinkage"
vendor-blockedforbidModel::"labor_*"
region-west-onlypermitTenant::"acme"
Pricing on Looker data, live product demo.

What Ward has eyes on.

The connection to Looker / Looker Studio is read-only and runs on your schedule. Ward reads straight from looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), and the rest of the feed, then joins it with external context your BI does not carry: weather, local events, competitor pricing.

Price on elasticity you can measure. Ward runs the model continuously rather than on a reporting cycle, which is why a finding lands the morning the pattern starts instead of at the end of the period.

Why this combination
is its own problem.

Price Optimization produces a lot of output that is technically correct and operationally useless to finance. Ward filters on whether the finding changes a decision a CFO can actually make.

What the first 90 days
actually look like.

  1. 01

    Week 1: connect

    Read-only credentials to Looker / Looker Studio. Ward pulls from looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata and starts building baselines. First findings land inside 48 hours, before baselines are stable, so you can see the shape of the output early.

  2. 02

    Weeks 2 to 3: baselines

    Ward needs roughly two weeks of history per store to separate a real deviation from normal variance. During this window the findings are directionally right and the thresholds are still moving.

  3. 03

    Weeks 4 to 12: operating rhythm

    Cards arrive each day and get triaged like any other queue. Most teams find the volume settles into something one person clears in ten minutes. What matters is the action rate, not the alert count.

How Ward connects to Looker / Looker Studio

Ward does not replace Looker. Ward watches the same data Looker visualizes and proactively alerts when something changes. Your dashboards stay. Ward adds intelligence.

Setup: Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.

Data Ward reads from Looker

Looker API for query results
Underlying database (direct)
LookML model metadata

Impact metrics with Looker

Time to Insight
Proactive, no login
Explains why metrics moved before anyone checks a dashboard.
Anomaly Detection
Inter-refresh coverage
Catches deviations between Looker dashboard refresh cycles.
Decision Velocity
Root cause attached
Every anomaly card includes cause analysis; no drill-down needed.
Data Utilization
Unused models activated
LookML dimensions and measures queried beyond built dashboards.

Data lake enrichment

Ward enriches Looker data with: Looker query results, Underlying database, Weather & events, Competitor data, Customer segments

Your P&L surprises are born on the store floor.

Pain points
  • ×Margin erosion only surfaces at month-end close
  • ×Inventory carrying costs are a black box
  • ×Working capital tied up in slow-moving stock nobody is watching
  • ×Same-store sales comps lack decomposition into actionable drivers
  • ×Capex decisions for store remodels lack unit-economics evidence
How Ward helps
  • GMROI tracking by category with weekly insight cards
  • Inventory carrying cost alerts when capital efficiency drops
  • Working capital optimization recommendations based on turnover trends
  • SSS decomposition into traffic, conversion, and basket components
  • Store-level unit economics cards for capex prioritization

Inventory distortion, overstock and out-of-stock combined, costs retailers $1.77 trillion globally. Source: IHL Group

Frequently asked questions

Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses. Data points include: Looker API for query results, Underlying database (direct), LookML model metadata.

Your P&L surprises are born on the store floor. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: GMROI tracking by category with weekly insight cards. Inventory carrying cost alerts when capital efficiency drops. Working capital optimization recommendations based on turnover trends.

First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.

No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.

See what pricing problems Ward catches.

Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.

Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly

Find out what your data has been hiding.

Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.

Step 1 of 3
What are your goals?
Step 2 of 3
About your operation
Step 3 of 3
Your contact info