Head of E-Com: shrinkage without the dashboard hunt
Most shrinkage tooling reports to analysts. Ward reports to the e-commerce lead who has to act on it.
Shrinkage Detection, scoped to e-commerce
Your online and offline data live in different worlds. Ward filters to what a Head of E-Com can act on and drops the rest.
Shrinkage Detection, in one sentence. Ward identifies abnormal inventory loss patterns and distinguishes between theft, damage, spoilage, and administrative error.
Under the hood. Ward compares expected inventory against actual counts, segments loss by cause category, and flags store-level anomalies against your estate baseline.
Capabilities
- Cause-level shrinkage attribution
- Store-vs-estate benchmarking
- Receiving dock anomaly detection
- Pattern recognition across time
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled Store 37’s last 28 days against the chain baseline. Two root causes, both compounding.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
labor_efficiency | Rev/labor-hour −22% vs. cluster, staffing mismatch at 11a–1p peak |
inventory.fresh | Fresh fill 83%, backroom replenishment lag at 2–4p |
promo.lift | BOGO crackers cannibalized Brand Y by 28%, net category +6% |
Recommend: re-baseline Store 37 schedule against true peak, raise replen window to 1p, and review the BOGO before next cycle.
labor_scheduling…
Reporting
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.
| Model | Horizon | MAPE |
|---|---|---|
holt_winters | 4wk | 4.1% |
arima_sarimax | 13wk | 8.9% |
gbm_demand | 1wk | 2.1% |
bayes_hier | new store | 11.4% |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
sap_pos_transactions | import | 2m ago |
sap_inventory_shrinkage | import | 2m ago |
sap_labor_scheduling | import | 14m ago |
retail_inventory_weekly | import | 1h ago |
retail_google_ads_daily | import | 1h ago |
retail_meta_ads_daily | import | 1h ago |
retail_ga4_website_daily | import | 1h ago |
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
merch-read-default | permit | Model::* |
finance-read-shrinkage | permit | Model::"inventory_shrinkage" |
vendor-blocked | forbid | Model::"labor_*" |
region-west-only | permit | Tenant::"acme" |
Why this combination
is its own problem.
A Head of E-Com does not need the shrinkage model explained. They need to know which stores moved, why, and what to do by end of day. Ward writes the finding at that altitude.
What Ward has eyes on.
Find the leak before it drains you. Ward runs the model continuously rather than on a reporting cycle, which is why a finding lands the morning the pattern starts instead of at the end of the period.
What the first 90 days
actually look like.
-
01
Week 1: read-only connection
Ward reads straight from your existing systems on a read-only connection. Nothing is written back. First findings arrive within 48 hours.
-
02
Weeks 2 to 3: baselines
Ward needs roughly two weeks of history per store to separate a real deviation from normal variance. During this window the cards are directionally right and the thresholds are still moving.
-
03
Weeks 4 to 12: steady state
Ward hands back findings daily, each with root cause and a recommended move. Volume settles at a level a single person can read over coffee. The measure of success is not how many insight cards arrive, it is how many get acted on.
Your online and offline data live in different worlds.
- ×Nobody can see one inventory position across every channel
- ×Online promo performance is measured separately from in-store
- ×Customer behavior data is siloed by channel
- ×BOPIS/BORIS operational complexity is growing unchecked
- ×Digital marketing attribution stops at the click
- ✓Unified insight cards across online and in-store channels
- ✓Cross-channel promo effectiveness with true attribution
- ✓Customer journey tracking across digital and physical touchpoints
- ✓BOPIS fulfillment performance monitoring with exception cards
- ✓Full-funnel marketing attribution to in-store conversion
Retailers with unified omnichannel data see 30% higher lifetime value per customer. Source: Harvard Business Review
Frequently asked questions
Your online and offline data live in different worlds. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Unified insight cards across online and in-store channels. Cross-channel promo effectiveness with true attribution. Customer journey tracking across digital and physical touchpoints.
First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.
No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.
Related solutions
See what shrinkage problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.