Assortment Planning for Convenience & C-Store, scoped to procurement
A convenience Head of Procurement owns transactions/hour, attach rate, basket size. Ward picks up the assortment movement in all of them in time to act.
Assortment Planning for Convenience procurement
For Convenience & C-Store retailers, that means watching 3,000+ SKUs across locations. High-frequency, low-SKU environments where every facing counts. Ward monitors impulse categories and daypart demand patterns around the clock.
Merchandising wants Ward. You sign the contract. Ward hands back findings scoped to procurement decision-making.
Assortment Planning, in one sentence. Ward analyzes sell-through by store cluster to recommend which SKUs to add, drop, or reallocate.
What Ward does with that: Ward clusters stores by demographic, traffic, and sales patterns, then measures SKU performance against cluster benchmarks.
Key capabilities
- SKU rationalization recommendations
- Whitespace opportunity detection
- Planogram optimization inputs
- Store cluster segmentation
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled the 6–9a daypart for the 14 Route 9 sites against the chain baseline. Two causes, one of them scheduling.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
daypart_sales | 6–9a revenue −11% vs. chain, coffee units −18% |
labor_scheduling | Second associate clocks in at 7:30a, peak starts 6:40a at 9 of 14 sites |
foodservice.waste | Breakfast sandwich waste 14%, hold times past 4 hours at 6 sites |
Recommend: move the second open to 6:15a at those nine sites, cut the breakfast batch by one tray, and re-check attach in two weeks.
daypart_sales…
Reporting
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.
| Model | Horizon | MAPE |
|---|---|---|
holt_winters | 4wk | 4.1% |
arima_sarimax | 13wk | 8.9% |
gbm_demand | 1wk | 2.1% |
bayes_hier | new store | 11.4% |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
ncr_pos_transactions | import | 2m ago |
pdi_fuel_transactions | import | 2m ago |
verifone_forecourt_events | import | 14m ago |
ncr_planogram_audit | import | 1h ago |
retail_daypart_sales | import | 1h ago |
retail_foodservice_waste | import | 1h ago |
retail_labor_scheduling | import | 1h ago |
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
ops-read-default | permit | Model::* |
lp-read-shrinkage | permit | Model::"inventory_shrinkage" |
vendor-blocked | forbid | Model::"labor_*" |
fuel-team-forecourt | permit | Model::"fuel_transactions" |
Why Assortment matters for Convenience retail
With 3,000 SKUs on a compact selling floor, every product must earn its place, and the right assortment is hyper-local. Ward clusters stores by traffic profile, daypart mix, and surrounding demographics to recommend variations that maximize revenue per square foot at each location.
What Ward has eyes on.
Stock what sells. Cut what doesn't. Ward runs the model continuously rather than on a reporting cycle, which is why a finding lands the morning the pattern starts instead of at the end of the period.
Coverage is store by store, category by category. Ward tracks transactions/hour, attach rate, basket size across 3,000+ SKUs and compares each store against its own baseline, not against the chain. That is the difference between knowing the footprint is fine and knowing which seven locations are not.
At the metric level. Ward tracks revenue per facing, velocity by daypart and cluster, redundancy analysis, and attach-rate contribution. It also monitors new-item performance against the displaced SKU to measure true assortment productivity.
Why this combination
is its own problem.
A Head of Procurement does not need the assortment model explained. They need to know which stores moved, why, and what to do by end of day. Ward writes the finding at that altitude.
- 01 New-item performance is measured against the new item's standalone sales without accounting for what was displaced; net assortment productivity often goes backwards.
- 02 Daypart adjacency (breakfast next to coffee) is a layout decision but isn't modeled in the assortment math; it shows up as "low SKU productivity" when really it's a placement issue.
Benchmarks. C-store top-200 SKUs typically generate 50-65% of inside revenue. Cluster-aware planograms usually free 10-20% of facings without revenue loss, redirecting that space to higher-velocity items and lifting same-store inside revenue 2-5%.
What the first 90 days
actually look like.
-
01
Week 1: connect
Read-only credentials to whatever holds your transaction and inventory data. Ward starts building baselines the same day. First daily cards land within 48 hours, before baselines are stable, so you can see the shape of the output early.
-
02
Weeks 2 to 3: baselines
Ward needs roughly two weeks of history per store to separate a real deviation from normal variance. During this window the daily cards are directionally right and the thresholds are still moving.
-
03
Weeks 4 to 12: steady state
Ward returns cards each day, each with the cause and a recommended move. Volume settles at a level a single person can read over coffee. The measure of success is not how many insight cards arrive, it is how many get acted on.
Merchandising wants Ward. You sign the contract.
- ×Business sponsor saw the demo. You have a week to vet a vendor you didn't pick
- ×AI vendors price by seats and tokens. Total cost is unknowable until invoice three
- ×Multi-year commits with auto-renew. No exit if the pilot stalls
- ×Renewals come back 30% higher, with no room to push back and no benchmark to cite
- ×Security and DPA reviews start after the team has already committed
- ✓MSA, DPA, SOC 2 Type II underway, and architecture review available before signature
- ✓Month-to-month contracts. No multi-year lock-in. No auto-renew traps
- ✓Transparent pricing set by scope and store count
- ✓14-day insight guarantee. If Ward doesn't deliver, month two is on us
- ✓AI strategy, orchestration and reporting-layer work in enterprise grocery at nine-figure revenue. Reference calls available before signature
Enterprise SaaS spend grew 18% YoY. 53% of subscriptions are underused or duplicative. Source: Gartner
Convenience KPI impact
Frequently asked questions
Ward analyzes sell-through by store cluster to recommend which SKUs to add, drop, or reallocate. For Convenience retail specifically, Ward monitors 3,000+ SKUs across your locations and delivers automated insight cards with root cause analysis and recommended actions.
Ward tracks Transactions/hour, Attach rate, Basket size, Planogram compliance, Daypart mix at the store-category level. Ward clusters stores by demographic, traffic, and sales patterns, then measures SKU performance against cluster benchmarks.
Merchandising wants Ward. You sign the contract. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: MSA, DPA, SOC 2 Type II underway, and architecture review available before signature. Month-to-month contracts. No multi-year lock-in. No auto-renew traps. Transparent pricing set by scope and store count.
Ward delivers daily insight cards covering Transactions/hour, Attach rate, Basket size, tailored for Procurement decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.
Ward tracks revenue per facing, velocity by daypart and cluster, redundancy analysis, and attach-rate contribution. It also monitors new-item performance against the displaced SKU to measure true assortment productivity.
A standardized planogram runs across all 500 locations. Ward identifies distinct store clusters, highway/travel, urban commuter, residential, university-adjacent, each overindexing on different categories. Ward recommends reallocating shelf space per cluster to match actual demand. Pilot stores show meaningful revenue uplift from better product-location matching with zero cost increase: same SKU count, just the right ones in the right stores.
First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.
No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.
Related solutions
See what Convenience assortment problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.