Assortment Planning for Convenience loss prevention
Shrinkage costs you more than you think. Ward finds out where. Ward tracks assortment throughout 3,000+ convenience SKUs and delivers the loss prevention read every morning.
What a convenience Head of LP sees in assortment
Shrinkage costs you more than you think. Ward finds out where. Ward raises the indicators that change a loss prevention decision.
Assortment Planning is a finding type Ward runs continuously. Ward analyzes sell-through by store cluster to recommend which SKUs to add, drop, or reallocate.
A Convenience & C-Store operator is tracking 3,000+ SKUs throughout locations. High-frequency, low-SKU environments where every facing counts. Ward monitors impulse categories and daypart demand patterns around the clock.
The mechanism. Ward clusters stores by demographic, traffic, and sales patterns, then measures SKU performance against cluster benchmarks.
The short list
- Whitespace opportunity detection
- Planogram optimization inputs
- Store cluster segmentation
- SKU rationalization recommendations
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled the 6–9a daypart for the 14 Route 9 sites against the chain baseline. Two causes, one of them scheduling.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
daypart_sales | 6–9a revenue −11% vs. chain, coffee units −18% |
labor_scheduling | Second associate clocks in at 7:30a, peak starts 6:40a at 9 of 14 sites |
foodservice.waste | Breakfast sandwich waste 14%, hold times past 4 hours at 6 sites |
Recommend: move the second open to 6:15a at those nine sites, cut the breakfast batch by one tray, and re-check attach in two weeks.
daypart_sales…
Reporting
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.
| Model | Horizon | MAPE |
|---|---|---|
holt_winters | 4wk | 4.1% |
arima_sarimax | 13wk | 8.9% |
gbm_demand | 1wk | 2.1% |
bayes_hier | new store | 11.4% |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
ncr_pos_transactions | import | 2m ago |
pdi_fuel_transactions | import | 2m ago |
verifone_forecourt_events | import | 14m ago |
ncr_planogram_audit | import | 1h ago |
retail_daypart_sales | import | 1h ago |
retail_foodservice_waste | import | 1h ago |
retail_labor_scheduling | import | 1h ago |
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
ops-read-default | permit | Model::* |
lp-read-shrinkage | permit | Model::"inventory_shrinkage" |
vendor-blocked | forbid | Model::"labor_*" |
fuel-team-forecourt | permit | Model::"fuel_transactions" |
Why Assortment matters for Convenience retail
With 3,000 SKUs on a compact selling floor, every product must earn its place, and the right assortment is hyper-local. Ward clusters stores by traffic profile, daypart mix, and surrounding demographics to recommend variations that maximize revenue per square foot at each location.
What Ward has eyes on.
Coverage is store by store, category by category. Ward monitors transactions/hour, attach rate, basket size over 3,000+ SKUs and compares each store against its own baseline, not against the chain. That is the difference between knowing the store base is fine and knowing which seven locations are not.
The assortment model runs daily, not on a reporting calendar. It catches the pattern, accounts for the cause, and attaches a recommended move before the number reaches a review deck.
At the metric level. Ward tracks revenue per facing, velocity by daypart and cluster, redundancy analysis, and attach-rate contribution. It also monitors new-item performance against the displaced SKU to measure true assortment productivity.
Why this combination
is its own problem.
A generic assortment model applied to a convenience footprint produces alerts nobody trusts. The thresholds are wrong, because convenience baselines are wrong for it. Ward learns the baseline from your own locations instead of importing one.
- 01 Daypart adjacency (breakfast next to coffee) is a layout decision but isn't modeled in the assortment math; it shows up as "low SKU productivity" when really it's a placement issue.
- 02 Chain-wide planograms over-allocate space to slow tail SKUs in high-volume stores and starve depth on the items that drive 60% of basket starts.
Benchmarks. C-store top-200 SKUs typically generate 50-65% of inside revenue. Cluster-aware planograms usually free 10-20% of facings without revenue loss, redirecting that space to higher-velocity items and lifting same-store inside revenue 2-5%.
What the first 90 days
actually look like.
-
01
Week 1: read-only connection
Ward reads your existing systems on a read-only connection. Nothing is written back. First insight cards arrive in two days.
-
02
Weeks 2 to 3: baselines
Ward needs roughly two weeks of history per store to separate a real deviation from normal variance. During this window the insight cards are directionally right and the thresholds are still moving.
-
03
Weeks 4 to 12: steady state
Ward hands you findings every morning, each with the cause and what to do about it. Volume settles at a level a single person can read over coffee. The measure of success is not how many findings arrive, it is how many get acted on.
Shrinkage costs you more than you think. Ward finds out where.
- ×Shrinkage lands as a year-end surprise
- ×Cannot distinguish theft from spoilage from admin error
- ×High-shrinkage stores only identified during audits
- ×No correlation between operational changes and loss patterns
- ×Exception-based reporting misses slow-bleed patterns
- ✓Store-level shrinkage tracking with cause attribution
- ✓Anomaly detection flags stores deviating from estate average
- ✓Receiving dock discrepancy patterns identified automatically
- ✓Correlation analysis links operational changes to loss shifts
- ✓Trend analysis catches slow-bleed patterns audits miss
US retail shrinkage hit $112.1 billion in 2022. Up 19.4% year over year. Source: National Retail Federation
Convenience KPI impact
Frequently asked questions
Ward analyzes sell-through by store cluster to recommend which SKUs to add, drop, or reallocate. For Convenience retail specifically, Ward monitors 3,000+ SKUs across your locations and delivers automated insight cards with root cause analysis and recommended actions.
Ward tracks Transactions/hour, Attach rate, Basket size, Planogram compliance, Daypart mix at the store-category level. Ward clusters stores by demographic, traffic, and sales patterns, then measures SKU performance against cluster benchmarks.
Shrinkage costs you more than you think. Ward finds out where. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Store-level shrinkage tracking with cause attribution. Anomaly detection flags stores deviating from estate average. Receiving dock discrepancy patterns identified automatically.
Ward delivers daily insight cards covering Transactions/hour, Attach rate, Basket size, tailored for Loss Prevention decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.
Ward tracks revenue per facing, velocity by daypart and cluster, redundancy analysis, and attach-rate contribution. It also monitors new-item performance against the displaced SKU to measure true assortment productivity.
A standardized planogram runs across all 500 locations. Ward identifies distinct store clusters, highway/travel, urban commuter, residential, university-adjacent, each overindexing on different categories. Ward recommends reallocating shelf space per cluster to match actual demand. Pilot stores show meaningful revenue uplift from better product-location matching with zero cost increase: same SKU count, just the right ones in the right stores.
First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.
No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.
Related solutions
See what Convenience assortment problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.