Convenience · Promos · Power BI · Head of LP

Head of LP: convenience promos, read from Microsoft Power BI

A convenience Head of LP on Power BI should not be hunting for promos problems. Ward pulls forward them daily.

Promo Effectiveness for Convenience on Power BI, scoped to loss prevention

What promo effectiveness does: Ward measures true promotional lift net of cannibalization, pull-forward, and pantry loading.

A Convenience & C-Store operator is watching 3,000+ SKUs across locations. High-frequency, low-SKU environments where every facing counts. Ward monitors impulse categories and daypart demand patterns around the clock.

Shrinkage costs you more than you think. Ward finds out where. Ward pulls forward the signals that change a loss prevention decision.

The mechanism. Ward isolates incremental volume from baseline, measures cross-SKU cannibalization, estimates pull-forward effects, and calculates true ROI.

Setup: Ward connects to the same data sources Power BI uses. Or reads Power BI datasets via REST API. Your reports stay untouched.

The short list

  • Promo ROI scorecards
  • Net lift measurement (not gross)
  • Cannibalization quantification
  • Pull-forward detection
app.getward.ai Live demo
Acme Convenience @Store Ops: Regional Analyst claude-sonnet default
A

Chat

Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.

Why is the morning daypart down at the Route 9 sites?
You · 9:42 AM
Schema Scout · routed to Store Ops Agent

I pulled the 6–9a daypart for the 14 Route 9 sites against the chain baseline. Two causes, one of them scheduling.

SignalFinding
daypart_sales6–9a revenue −11% vs. chain, coffee units −18%
labor_schedulingSecond associate clocks in at 7:30a, peak starts 6:40a at 9 of 14 sites
foodservice.wasteBreakfast sandwich waste 14%, hold times past 4 hours at 6 sites

Recommend: move the second open to 6:15a at those nine sites, cut the breakfast batch by one tray, and re-check attach in two weeks.

7 parallel queries 3 sources cited confidence 0.91
Show me the schedule change by site.
You · 9:43 AM
Labor Agent · drafting shift diff
Querying daypart_sales
Ask anything, Ward routes to the right agent. Cmd+K

Reporting

Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.

7d13w52w
Inside-store sales
$12.9M
+2.4% WoW
Foodservice margin
47.3%
−2.1pp
Attach, fuel-to-store
31.2%
−1.6pp
Shrink, cigarettes
1.94%
+0.6pp
Inside-store sales 13 weeks actual, 6 weeks forecast, 80% interval
Actual Forecast 80% interval
% of plan 106 94 100 forecast → W−13 W−5 today +6wk
Holt-Winters + weather regressor MAPE 4.1% at 4wk Backtested 24 months Crosses plan in 3 weeks
Forecast error by horizon MAPE, 24-month backtest
1wk 2.1%
2wk 3.0%
4wk 4.1%
8wk 6.3%
13wk 8.9%
Accuracy bar for promo decisions: ≤5% at 4wk
Models in production Every forecast ships a model card
ModelHorizonMAPE
holt_winters4wk4.1%
arima_sarimax13wk8.9%
gbm_demand1wk2.1%
bayes_hiernew store11.4%

Sources

Connect external systems to the data lake.

NameTypeLast sync
ncr_pos_transactionsimport2m ago
pdi_fuel_transactionsimport2m ago
verifone_forecourt_eventsimport14m ago
ncr_planogram_auditimport1h ago
retail_daypart_salesimport1h ago
retail_foodservice_wasteimport1h ago
retail_labor_schedulingimport1h ago

Policies

Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.

TLS 1.3 AES-256 Read-only SOC 2 II
Policy IDEffectResources
ops-read-defaultpermitModel::*
lp-read-shrinkagepermitModel::"inventory_shrinkage"
vendor-blockedforbidModel::"labor_*"
fuel-team-forecourtpermitModel::"fuel_transactions"
Promos for Convenience on Power BI data, live product demo.

Why Promos matters for Convenience retail

Most c-store operators accept vendor-funded promotions without measuring whether they actually improve store economics. Multi-unit deals can cannibalize single-unit margin, and rebates often don't offset the erosion. Ward measures the true P&L impact of each program, giving operators evidence for vendor negotiations.

What Ward has eyes on.

Know which promos actually work. Ward runs the model continuously rather than on a reporting cycle, which is why a finding lands the morning the pattern starts instead of at the end of the period.

Ward scans continuously 3,000+ SKUs over your locations, at the store-category level rather than the chain roll-up. The metrics under watch include transactions/hour, attach rate, basket size. A roll-up hides a single-store problem inside a healthy average, which is how daypart demand variation stays invisible for a quarter.

The connection to Microsoft Power BI is read-only and runs on your schedule. Ward pulls from power BI REST API datasets, underlying SQL/Azure data, and the rest of the feed, then stitches together it with external context your BI does not carry: weather, local events, competitor pricing.

At the metric level. Ward tracks unit lift vs margin impact, single-to-multi-unit cannibalization, vendor funding offset accuracy, and post-promo demand suppression, including inventory holding, labor for reset, and displaced revenue from non-promoted items.

Signals · POS at SKU-store-day with promo flags, full vendor funding terms, event calendars, labor schedules, and basket compositions including adjacent SKU effects.

Why this combination
is its own problem.

Microsoft Power BI is the system of record for most convenience operators of your size, which means the indicators Ward needs are already there. The gap is not data collection. It is that nobody has time to read power BI REST API datasets and underlying SQL/Azure data every morning across every store.

  • 01 Display labor and reset cost is left out of promo P&L; on tight-staffing nights, store-level cost can exceed vendor funding.
  • 02 Multi-unit price points (2-for-$3) shift demand from higher-margin single-unit purchases without showing up in event-window reporting.

Benchmarks. C-store vendor promo programs typically show 15-50% gross unit lift and 3-15% net margin lift after cannibalization, funding, and labor. Most chains run 100-300 vendor events per year; the bottom quartile is usually negative-net.

What the first 90 days
actually look like.

  1. 01

    Week 1: connect

    Read-only credentials to Microsoft Power BI. Ward ingests power BI REST API datasets, underlying SQL/Azure data, dataflow outputs and starts building baselines. First cards land inside 48 hours, before baselines are stable, so you can see the shape of the output early.

  2. 02

    Weeks 2 to 3: baselines

    Ward needs roughly two weeks of history per store to separate a real deviation from normal variance. During this window the findings are directionally right and the thresholds are still moving.

  3. 03

    Weeks 4 to 12: steady state

    Ward hands back findings each day, each with what caused it and a recommended move. Volume settles at a level a single person can read over coffee. The measure of success is not how many insight cards arrive, it is how many get acted on.

How Ward connects to Microsoft Power BI

Ward sits alongside Power BI. Your dashboards visualize. Ward detects and explains what changed. No dashboard login needed for your morning brief.

Setup: Ward connects to the same data sources Power BI uses. Or reads Power BI datasets via REST API. Your reports stay untouched.

Data Ward reads from Power BI

Power BI REST API datasets
Underlying SQL/Azure data
Dataflow outputs

Impact metrics with Power BI

Time to Insight
Push, not pull
Insight cards delivered without waiting for someone to look.
Anomaly Detection
Between-refresh coverage
Issues surfaced before the next scheduled Power BI review.
Decision Velocity
Cause analysis included
No drill-down investigation; cards carry root cause context.
Report Efficiency
Ad-hoc requests reduced
Proactive cards answer questions before analysts get asked.

Data lake enrichment

Ward enriches Power BI data with: Power BI datasets, Underlying SQL/Azure data, Weather & events, Demographics, Custom feeds

Shrinkage costs you more than you think. Ward finds out where.

Pain points
  • ×Shrinkage lands as a year-end surprise
  • ×Cannot distinguish theft from spoilage from admin error
  • ×High-shrinkage stores only identified during audits
  • ×No correlation between operational changes and loss patterns
  • ×Exception-based reporting misses slow-bleed patterns
How Ward helps
  • Store-level shrinkage tracking with cause attribution
  • Anomaly detection flags stores deviating from estate average
  • Receiving dock discrepancy patterns identified automatically
  • Correlation analysis links operational changes to loss shifts
  • Trend analysis catches slow-bleed patterns audits miss

US retail shrinkage hit $112.1 billion in 2022. Up 19.4% year over year. Source: National Retail Federation

Convenience KPI impact

Attach Rate
Impulse adjacencies
Daypart-specific cross-sell opportunities surfaced.
Daypart Revenue
Weak hours identified
Which hours and categories underperform, and why.
Planogram Compliance
Sales-correlated flags
Deviations flagged once they start costing revenue.
Shrinkage
Slow-bleed detection
Transaction-level anomalies that periodic audits miss.

Frequently asked questions

Ward measures true promotional lift net of cannibalization, pull-forward, and pantry loading. For Convenience retail specifically, Ward monitors 3,000+ SKUs across your locations and delivers automated insight cards with root cause analysis and recommended actions.

Ward tracks Transactions/hour, Attach rate, Basket size, Planogram compliance, Daypart mix at the store-category level. Ward isolates incremental volume from baseline, measures cross-SKU cannibalization, estimates pull-forward effects, and calculates true ROI.

Ward connects to the same data sources Power BI uses. Or reads Power BI datasets via REST API. Your reports stay untouched. Data points include: Power BI REST API datasets, Underlying SQL/Azure data, Dataflow outputs.

Yes. Ward reads Power BI data and combines it with contextual signals (weather, events, demographics) to generate Convenience-specific insight cards. No custom development required.

Shrinkage costs you more than you think. Ward finds out where. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Store-level shrinkage tracking with cause attribution. Anomaly detection flags stores deviating from estate average. Receiving dock discrepancy patterns identified automatically.

Ward delivers daily insight cards covering Transactions/hour, Attach rate, Basket size, tailored for Loss Prevention decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.

Ward tracks unit lift vs margin impact, single-to-multi-unit cannibalization, vendor funding offset accuracy, and post-promo demand suppression, including inventory holding, labor for reset, and displaced revenue from non-promoted items.

A top beverage vendor runs 26 promotional events per year across the chain. Ward reveals that fewer than half generate positive net margin after accounting for cannibalization and margin erosion. Ward provides per-event ROI scorecards the category manager uses to renegotiate: fewer but deeper promotions on high-ROI events, elimination of negative-margin ones, and better vendor funding terms.

First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.

No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.

See what Convenience promos problems Ward catches.

Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.

Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly

Find out what your data has been hiding.

Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.

Step 1 of 3
What are your goals?
Step 2 of 3
About your operation
Step 3 of 3
Your contact info