Fashion demand from Looker, briefed to merchandising
See demand before it arrives. Ward runs it on Looker data throughout your fashion fleet, scoped to merchandising.
How a fashion VP Merchandising runs demand on Looker / Looker Studio
Demand Forecasting, in one sentence. Ward combines historical patterns, weather data, local events, and economic signals to forecast demand at the store-SKU-day level.
Applied to Fashion & Apparel, the surface area is 15,000+ SKUs over locations. Seasonal sell-through, size curve optimization, and markdown timing. Ward monitors style velocity and flags slow movers before the window closes.
Your category managers are drowning in spreadsheets. Ward writes the finding at the altitude a VP Merchandising works at.
How it runs. Ward builds store-level demand models incorporating seasonality, weather forecasts, promotional calendars, local events, and macroeconomic indicators.
Setup: Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
Capabilities
- Event and holiday modeling
- Automatic reorder point recalculation
- Store-SKU-day level precision
- Weather-driven adjustment
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled fall denim against last season’s curve at the same selling week. Two causes, both still fixable this week.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
sell_through | Week 6 sell-through 38% vs. 52% plan, concentrated in 3 of 9 door clusters |
size_curve | Waist 30–32 sold out in 41 doors while 36–38 sits at 71% on hand |
markdown.ladder | First markdown is 3 weeks later than LY, weeks-of-supply now 11.4 |
Recommend: transfer 30–32 out of the 12 overstocked doors, hold the ladder on core indigo, and take the first markdown on light wash now while it still clears at 20%.
sell_through_weekly…
Reporting
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.
| Model | Horizon | MAPE |
|---|---|---|
holt_winters | 4wk | 4.1% |
arima_sarimax | 13wk | 8.9% |
gbm_demand | 1wk | 2.1% |
bayes_hier | new store | 11.4% |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
shopify_orders_daily | import | 2m ago |
shopify_returns_reasons | import | 2m ago |
netsuite_inventory_snapshot | import | 14m ago |
cegid_store_sales | import | 1h ago |
retail_size_curve_actuals | import | 1h ago |
retail_markdown_ladder | import | 1h ago |
retail_ga4_website_daily | import | 1h ago |
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
merch-read-default | permit | Model::* |
finance-read-markdown | permit | Model::"markdown_ladder" |
vendor-blocked | forbid | Model::"labor_*" |
ecom-read-returns | permit | Model::"returns_reasons" |
Why Demand matters for Fashion retail
Most fashion SKUs have zero sales history, they're new every season, so time-series models fail. Ward takes an attribute-based approach, clustering new styles against historical analogues by silhouette, colorway, price point, and fabric weight, then calibrating in real time as early sell-through data arrives.
What Ward has eyes on.
Every one of your locations gets its own baseline. Ward keeps a running read on sell-through rate, markdown %, return rate against it and raises only the deviations that hold up. The two that show up most in fashion retail are markdown timing and size curve misallocation, and both are baseline problems before they are P&L problems.
Ward ingests looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata from Looker / Looker Studio on a read-only connection. Nothing is written back, and your BI configuration does not change. Looker stays the system of record.
The demand model runs on a daily cycle, not on a reporting calendar. It catches the pattern, accounts for root cause, and attaches the next step before the number reaches a review deck.
At the metric level. Ward uses attribute-based similarity models, trend velocity indicators, store cluster demand profiles, and early-signal calibration from the first weeks of sell-through. It also tracks fashion cycle timing to anticipate when trends peak and decay.
Why this combination
is its own problem.
A VP Merchandising rarely logs into Looker. They read what someone else pulled out of it, two days later. Ward removes the two days and the someone else.
- 01 Pre-season buys are sized off prior-year category totals, ignoring that the trend mix has shifted (more elevated denim, less basic tee) within the category.
- 02 Early sell-through (weeks 1-2) is dismissed as noise when in reality it's the highest-signal indicator of full-season trajectory.
Benchmarks. Fashion forecast accuracy: 30-45% MAPE pre-season, dropping to 18-28% by week 4 of selling. Operators using attribute-based modeling typically reduce week-1 first-allocation error by 25-40% and recover 1-3 points of full-price sell-through.
What the first 90 days
actually look like.
-
01
Week 1: connect
Read-only credentials to Looker / Looker Studio. Ward reads straight from looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata and starts building baselines. First insight cards land inside 48 hours, before baselines are stable, so you can see the shape of the output early.
-
02
Weeks 2 to 3: baselines
Ward needs roughly two weeks of history per store to separate a real deviation from normal variance. During this window the insight cards are directionally right and the thresholds are still moving.
-
03
Weeks 4 to 12: operating rhythm
Findings arrive each day and get triaged like any other queue. Most teams find the volume settles into something one person clears in ten minutes. What matters is the action rate, not the alert count.
How Ward connects to Looker / Looker Studio
Ward does not replace Looker. Ward watches the same data Looker visualizes and proactively alerts when something changes. Your dashboards stay. Ward adds intelligence.
Setup: Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
Data Ward reads from Looker
Impact metrics with Looker
Data lake enrichment
Ward enriches Looker data with: Looker query results, Underlying database, Weather & events, Competitor data, Customer segments
Your category managers are drowning in spreadsheets.
- ×Promo planning still runs off last year's playbook
- ×Assortment reviews happen quarterly when they should happen daily
- ×Price changes chase the market a week behind it
- ×No visibility into true cannibalization across categories
- ×Vendor negotiations lack real-time sell-through evidence
- ✓Insight cards flag promo cannibalization the day it happens
- ✓Assortment gaps and whitespace opportunities surface automatically
- ✓Price elasticity shifts detected before margin erosion compounds
- ✓Category-level performance cards replace manual spreadsheet reviews
- ✓Vendor scorecards generated from actual fill rate and quality data
Retailers lose an estimated $300B+ annually to suboptimal assortment and promotional decisions. Source: McKinsey & Company
Fashion KPI impact
Frequently asked questions
Ward combines historical patterns, weather data, local events, and economic signals to forecast demand at the store-SKU-day level. For Fashion retail specifically, Ward monitors 15,000+ SKUs across your locations and delivers automated insight cards with root cause analysis and recommended actions.
Ward tracks Sell-through rate, Markdown %, Return rate, Style velocity, Size accuracy at the store-category level. Ward builds store-level demand models incorporating seasonality, weather forecasts, promotional calendars, local events, and macroeconomic indicators.
Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses. Data points include: Looker API for query results, Underlying database (direct), LookML model metadata.
Yes. Ward reads Looker data and combines it with contextual signals (weather, events, demographics) to generate Fashion-specific insight cards. No custom development required.
Your category managers are drowning in spreadsheets. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Insight cards flag promo cannibalization the day it happens. Assortment gaps and whitespace opportunities surface automatically. Price elasticity shifts detected before margin erosion compounds.
Ward delivers daily insight cards covering Sell-through rate, Markdown %, Return rate, tailored for Merchandising decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.
Ward uses attribute-based similarity models, trend velocity indicators, store cluster demand profiles, and early-signal calibration from the first weeks of sell-through. It also tracks fashion cycle timing to anticipate when trends peak and decay.
The buying team is finalizing quantities for hundreds of new fall styles with no sell-through history. Ward maps each to attribute clusters from prior seasons and adjusts for current trend velocity. The result is store-cluster-level buy recommendations that materially reduce first-allocation error, meaning fewer stockouts on winners and less dead inventory on misses.
First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.
No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.
Related solutions
See what Fashion demand problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.