Head of E-Com: fashion demand, read from Looker / Looker Studio
Ward reads straight from looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata from Looker / Looker Studio, monitors demand throughout 15,000+ fashion SKUs, and delivers the e-commerce read on a daily cycle.
Demand Forecasting for Fashion on Looker, scoped to e-commerce
In a Fashion & Apparel store base the job is 15,000+ SKUs throughout locations. Seasonal sell-through, size curve optimization, and markdown timing. Ward monitors style velocity and flags slow movers before the window closes.
Your online and offline data live in different worlds. Ward writes the finding at the altitude a Head of E-Com works at.
Demand Forecasting is a card type Ward runs continuously. Ward combines historical patterns, weather data, local events, and economic signals to forecast demand at the store-SKU-day level.
What Ward does with that: Ward builds store-level demand models incorporating seasonality, weather forecasts, promotional calendars, local events, and macroeconomic indicators.
How the connection works. Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
Key capabilities
- Event and holiday modeling
- Automatic reorder point recalculation
- Store-SKU-day level precision
- Weather-driven adjustment
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled fall denim against last season’s curve at the same selling week. Two causes, both still fixable this week.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
sell_through | Week 6 sell-through 38% vs. 52% plan, concentrated in 3 of 9 door clusters |
size_curve | Waist 30–32 sold out in 41 doors while 36–38 sits at 71% on hand |
markdown.ladder | First markdown is 3 weeks later than LY, weeks-of-supply now 11.4 |
Recommend: transfer 30–32 out of the 12 overstocked doors, hold the ladder on core indigo, and take the first markdown on light wash now while it still clears at 20%.
sell_through_weekly…
Reporting
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.
| Model | Horizon | MAPE |
|---|---|---|
holt_winters | 4wk | 4.1% |
arima_sarimax | 13wk | 8.9% |
gbm_demand | 1wk | 2.1% |
bayes_hier | new store | 11.4% |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
shopify_orders_daily | import | 2m ago |
shopify_returns_reasons | import | 2m ago |
netsuite_inventory_snapshot | import | 14m ago |
cegid_store_sales | import | 1h ago |
retail_size_curve_actuals | import | 1h ago |
retail_markdown_ladder | import | 1h ago |
retail_ga4_website_daily | import | 1h ago |
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
merch-read-default | permit | Model::* |
finance-read-markdown | permit | Model::"markdown_ladder" |
vendor-blocked | forbid | Model::"labor_*" |
ecom-read-returns | permit | Model::"returns_reasons" |
Why Demand matters for Fashion retail
Most fashion SKUs have zero sales history, they're new every season, so time-series models fail. Ward takes an attribute-based approach, clustering new styles against historical analogues by silhouette, colorway, price point, and fabric weight, then calibrating in real time as early sell-through data arrives.
Why this combination
is its own problem.
A Head of E-Com in fashion retail owns numbers that move faster than the reporting cycle that covers them. Sell-through rate, markdown %, return rate shift store by store, daily. A monthly pack cannot represent that. Your online and offline data live in different worlds.
- 01 Early sell-through (weeks 1-2) is dismissed as noise when in reality it's the highest-signal indicator of full-season trajectory.
- 02 Pre-season buys are sized off prior-year category totals, ignoring that the trend mix has shifted (more elevated denim, less basic tee) within the category.
Benchmarks. Fashion forecast accuracy: 30-45% MAPE pre-season, dropping to 18-28% by week 4 of selling. Operators using attribute-based modeling typically reduce week-1 first-allocation error by 25-40% and recover 1-3 points of full-price sell-through.
What Ward has eyes on.
See demand before it arrives. Ward runs the model continuously rather than on a reporting cycle, which is why a finding lands the morning the pattern starts instead of at the end of the period.
Ward watches 15,000+ SKUs across your locations, at the store-category level rather than the chain roll-up. The metrics under watch include sell-through rate, markdown %, return rate. A roll-up hides a single-store problem inside a healthy average, which is how markdown timing stays invisible for a quarter.
Ward reads Looker rather than replacing it. Looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata come across on a read-only connection, get enriched with contextual data, and come back as findings. Your BI is untouched.
At the metric level. Ward uses attribute-based similarity models, trend velocity indicators, store cluster demand profiles, and early-signal calibration from the first weeks of sell-through. It also tracks fashion cycle timing to anticipate when trends peak and decay.
What the first 90 days
actually look like.
-
01
Week 1: read-only connection
Ward plugs into Looker / Looker Studio with read-only credentials and begins ingesting looker API for query results and underlying database (direct). No config changes on your side. First findings arrive in two days.
-
02
Weeks 2 to 3: baselines
Ward needs roughly two weeks of history per store to separate a real deviation from normal variance. During this window the insight cards are directionally right and the thresholds are still moving.
-
03
Weeks 4 to 12: steady state
Ward hands you insight cards each day, each with what caused it and what to do about it. Volume settles at a level a single person can read over coffee. The measure of success is not how many findings arrive, it is how many get acted on.
How Ward connects to Looker / Looker Studio
Ward does not replace Looker. Ward watches the same data Looker visualizes and proactively alerts when something changes. Your dashboards stay. Ward adds intelligence.
Setup: Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
Data Ward reads from Looker
Impact metrics with Looker
Data lake enrichment
Ward enriches Looker data with: Looker query results, Underlying database, Weather & events, Competitor data, Customer segments
Your online and offline data live in different worlds.
- ×Nobody can see one inventory position across every channel
- ×Online promo performance is measured separately from in-store
- ×Customer behavior data is siloed by channel
- ×BOPIS/BORIS operational complexity is growing unchecked
- ×Digital marketing attribution stops at the click
- ✓Unified insight cards across online and in-store channels
- ✓Cross-channel promo effectiveness with true attribution
- ✓Customer journey tracking across digital and physical touchpoints
- ✓BOPIS fulfillment performance monitoring with exception cards
- ✓Full-funnel marketing attribution to in-store conversion
Retailers with unified omnichannel data see 30% higher lifetime value per customer. Source: Harvard Business Review
Fashion KPI impact
Frequently asked questions
Ward combines historical patterns, weather data, local events, and economic signals to forecast demand at the store-SKU-day level. For Fashion retail specifically, Ward monitors 15,000+ SKUs across your locations and delivers automated insight cards with root cause analysis and recommended actions.
Ward tracks Sell-through rate, Markdown %, Return rate, Style velocity, Size accuracy at the store-category level. Ward builds store-level demand models incorporating seasonality, weather forecasts, promotional calendars, local events, and macroeconomic indicators.
Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses. Data points include: Looker API for query results, Underlying database (direct), LookML model metadata.
Yes. Ward reads Looker data and combines it with contextual signals (weather, events, demographics) to generate Fashion-specific insight cards. No custom development required.
Your online and offline data live in different worlds. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Unified insight cards across online and in-store channels. Cross-channel promo effectiveness with true attribution. Customer journey tracking across digital and physical touchpoints.
Ward delivers daily insight cards covering Sell-through rate, Markdown %, Return rate, tailored for E-Commerce decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.
Ward uses attribute-based similarity models, trend velocity indicators, store cluster demand profiles, and early-signal calibration from the first weeks of sell-through. It also tracks fashion cycle timing to anticipate when trends peak and decay.
The buying team is finalizing quantities for hundreds of new fall styles with no sell-through history. Ward maps each to attribute clusters from prior seasons and adjusts for current trend velocity. The result is store-cluster-level buy recommendations that materially reduce first-allocation error, meaning fewer stockouts on winners and less dead inventory on misses.
First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.
No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.
Related solutions
See what Fashion demand problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.