Fill Rate · RELEX · Director Store Ops

Director Store Ops: fill rate straight off RELEX

Every empty shelf is a lost sale. Ward runs it off RELEX, scoped to what a Director Store Ops owns.

How a Director Store Ops runs fill rate off RELEX Solutions

Managing 800 stores from a spreadsheet is insane. Ward filters to what a Director Store Ops can act on and drops the rest.

Fill Rate Monitoring, in one sentence. Ward monitors on-shelf availability across your entire estate and flags stores or categories dropping below threshold.

How Ward hands back Fill Rate daily cards: Ward tracks expected vs actual on-shelf availability at the store-category level and escalates when fill rate drops below configurable thresholds.

Getting the data in. Ward reads RELEX data via API. Monitors forecast accuracy and flags exceptions before they compound.

The short list

  • Store-vs-estate benchmarking
  • Category-level drill-down
  • Estate-wide fill rate dashboard
  • Threshold-based alerting
app.getward.ai Live demo
Acme Retail @Merchandising: VP Analyst claude-sonnet default
A

Chat

Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.

Why did Store 37 miss target last week?
You · 9:42 AM
Schema Scout · routed to Merchandising Agent

I pulled Store 37’s last 28 days against the chain baseline. Two root causes, both compounding.

SignalFinding
labor_efficiencyRev/labor-hour −22% vs. cluster, staffing mismatch at 11a–1p peak
inventory.freshFresh fill 83%, backroom replenishment lag at 2–4p
promo.liftBOGO crackers cannibalized Brand Y by 28%, net category +6%

Recommend: re-baseline Store 37 schedule against true peak, raise replen window to 1p, and review the BOGO before next cycle.

8 parallel queries 3 sources cited confidence 0.92
Show me how to fix the staffing mismatch.
You · 9:43 AM
Labor Agent · drafting schedule diff
Querying labor_scheduling
Ask anything, Ward routes to the right agent. Cmd+K

Reporting

Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.

7d13w52w
Revenue vs. forecast
$48.2M
+4.2% WoW
Gross margin %
24.1%
−3.2pp
Fill rate, fresh
83.4%
−4.1pp
Shrink, West region
2.41%
+0.8pp
Revenue vs. forecast 13 weeks actual, 6 weeks forecast, 80% interval
Actual Forecast 80% interval
% of plan 106 94 100 forecast → W−13 W−5 today +6wk
Holt-Winters + weather regressor MAPE 4.1% at 4wk Backtested 24 months Crosses plan in 3 weeks
Forecast error by horizon MAPE, 24-month backtest
1wk 2.1%
2wk 3.0%
4wk 4.1%
8wk 6.3%
13wk 8.9%
Accuracy bar for promo decisions: ≤5% at 4wk
Models in production Every forecast ships a model card
ModelHorizonMAPE
holt_winters4wk4.1%
arima_sarimax13wk8.9%
gbm_demand1wk2.1%
bayes_hiernew store11.4%

Sources

Connect external systems to the data lake.

NameTypeLast sync
sap_pos_transactionsimport2m ago
sap_inventory_shrinkageimport2m ago
sap_labor_schedulingimport14m ago
retail_inventory_weeklyimport1h ago
retail_google_ads_dailyimport1h ago
retail_meta_ads_dailyimport1h ago
retail_ga4_website_dailyimport1h ago

Policies

Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.

TLS 1.3 AES-256 Read-only SOC 2 II
Policy IDEffectResources
merch-read-defaultpermitModel::*
finance-read-shrinkagepermitModel::"inventory_shrinkage"
vendor-blockedforbidModel::"labor_*"
region-west-onlypermitTenant::"acme"
Fill Rate on RELEX data, live product demo.

Why this combination
is its own problem.

Most fill rate projects stall at data access. This one does not, because RELEX already exposes demand forecasts, space plans, workforce forecasts through an API Ward reads directly.

What Ward has eyes on.

The fill rate model runs every morning, not on a reporting calendar. It picks up the pattern, traces the cause, and attaches the next step before the number reaches a review deck.

Ward reads demand forecasts, space plans, workforce forecasts from RELEX Solutions on a read-only connection. Nothing is written back, and your Supply Chain configuration does not change. RELEX stays the system of record.

What the first 90 days
actually look like.

  1. 01

    Week 1: connect

    Read-only credentials to RELEX Solutions. Ward reads straight from demand forecasts, space plans, workforce forecasts and starts building baselines. First findings land inside 48 hours, before baselines are stable, so you can see the shape of the output early.

  2. 02

    Weeks 2 to 3: baselines

    Ward needs roughly two weeks of history per store to separate a real deviation from normal variance. During this window the cards are directionally right and the thresholds are still moving.

  3. 03

    Weeks 4 to 12: operating rhythm

    Findings arrive daily and get triaged like any other queue. Most teams find the volume settles into something one person clears in ten minutes. What matters is the action rate, not the alert count.

How Ward connects to RELEX Solutions

Ward integrates with RELEX for unified retail planning. Ward monitors RELEX forecasts against actuals and surfaces planning exceptions as insight cards.

Setup: Ward reads RELEX data via API. Monitors forecast accuracy and flags exceptions before they compound.

Data Ward reads from RELEX

Demand forecasts
Space plans
Workforce forecasts
Promotion plans
Replenishment orders

Impact metrics with RELEX

Forecast Accuracy
Drift flagged per store
Accuracy decay caught before it compounds across locations.
Space Productivity
Planogram gaps exposed
Space plans checked against actual sell-through per fixture.
Replenishment Efficiency
Manual triage reduced
Exceptions ranked by revenue impact and urgency.
Fresh Waste
Perishable ordering tightened
Hyperlocal weather and events sharpen fresh item forecasts.

Data lake enrichment

Ward enriches RELEX data with: RELEX forecasts, POS actuals, Weather & events, Demographic data, Supplier performance

Managing 800 stores from a spreadsheet is insane.

Pain points
  • ×Morning check-ins rely on phone calls and email chains
  • ×No single view of which stores need attention today
  • ×Labor scheduling is disconnected from demand signals
  • ×Planogram compliance is checked manually, quarterly
  • ×Exception management is reactive and inconsistent
How Ward helps
  • Morning brief delivered at 06:47 with prioritized action list
  • Estate-wide heat map of store performance, updated hourly
  • Staffing recommendations correlated with predicted traffic
  • Planogram compliance anomalies detected and flagged
  • Consistent exception handling with recommended actions

Poor labor allocation and inconsistent execution cost multi-store retailers 3–5% in lost sales. Source: RSR Research

Frequently asked questions

Ward reads RELEX data via API. Monitors forecast accuracy and flags exceptions before they compound. Data points include: Demand forecasts, Space plans, Workforce forecasts, Promotion plans, Replenishment orders.

Managing 800 stores from a spreadsheet is insane. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Morning brief delivered at 06:47 with prioritized action list. Estate-wide heat map of store performance, updated hourly. Staffing recommendations correlated with predicted traffic.

First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.

No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.

See what fill rate problems Ward catches.

Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.

Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly

Find out what your data has been hiding.

Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.

Step 1 of 3
What are your goals?
Step 2 of 3
About your operation
Step 3 of 3
Your contact info