Grocery fill rate from RELEX, briefed to technology
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward detects grocery fill rate movement in your RELEX data before it compounds, with root cause and the next step attached.
The full picture: grocery fill rate, RELEX data, Technology decisions
Fill Rate Monitoring, in one sentence. Ward monitors on-shelf availability across your entire estate and flags stores or categories dropping below threshold.
Applied to Grocery & Supermarket, the surface area is 30,000+ SKUs throughout stores. Fresh availability, shrinkage, and promo effectiveness across hundreds of stores. Ward monitors perishable turn rates and flags waste before it happens.
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward writes the finding at the altitude a Head of IT works at.
The mechanism. Ward tracks expected vs actual on-shelf availability at the store-category level and escalates when fill rate drops below configurable thresholds.
Setup: Ward reads RELEX data via API. Monitors forecast accuracy and flags exceptions before they compound.
What you get
- Store-vs-estate benchmarking
- Category-level drill-down
- Estate-wide fill rate dashboard
- Threshold-based alerting
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled Store 37’s last 28 days against the chain baseline. Two root causes, both compounding.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
labor_efficiency | Rev/labor-hour −22% vs. cluster, staffing mismatch at 11a–1p peak |
inventory.fresh | Fresh fill 83%, backroom replenishment lag at 2–4p |
promo.lift | BOGO crackers cannibalized Brand Y by 28%, net category +6% |
Recommend: re-baseline Store 37 schedule against true peak, raise replen window to 1p, and review the BOGO before next cycle.
labor_scheduling…
Reporting
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.
| Model | Horizon | MAPE |
|---|---|---|
holt_winters | 4wk | 4.1% |
arima_sarimax | 13wk | 8.9% |
gbm_demand | 1wk | 2.1% |
bayes_hier | new store | 11.4% |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
sap_pos_transactions | import | 2m ago |
sap_inventory_shrinkage | import | 2m ago |
sap_labor_scheduling | import | 14m ago |
relex_replenishment_plan | import | 1h ago |
blue_yonder_forecast_daily | import | 1h ago |
retail_fresh_waste_daily | import | 1h ago |
retail_promo_calendar | import | 1h ago |
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
merch-read-default | permit | Model::* |
lp-read-shrinkage | permit | Model::"inventory_shrinkage" |
vendor-blocked | forbid | Model::"labor_*" |
fresh-team-west | permit | Model::"fresh_waste_daily" |
Why Fill Rate matters for Grocery retail
Estate-wide fill rate averages mask critical variation, a chain at 94% overall can have dozens of stores hemorrhaging revenue below 88%. Ward monitors fill rate at the store-category-hour level, because a produce section that empties by 4 PM is a fundamentally different problem than one consistently understocked.
Why this combination
is its own problem.
Fill Rate Monitoring needs demand forecasts and space plans at minimum. RELEX Solutions carries both, at the grain the model needs. That is the whole integration story: no middleware, no staging warehouse, no custom extract.
- 01 DSD categories (bread, milk, beer, soda) sit outside the fill rate measurement framework because the vendor owns replenishment.
- 02 Daily fill rate snapshots miss the afternoon emptying pattern; a 96% open-of-day reading can drop to 84% by 6 PM in produce.
Benchmarks. Healthy grocery on-shelf availability: 96-98% center store, 92-95% perishable, 88-92% during the closing daypart. Each percentage-point drop on top-100 SKUs ties to roughly 0.3-0.5% category revenue erosion; on milk, eggs, and bread the multiplier is 2-3x because of basket abandonment.
What Ward has eyes on.
The connection to RELEX Solutions is read-only and runs on your schedule. Ward ingests demand forecasts, space plans, and the rest of the feed, then cross-references it with external context your Supply Chain does not carry: weather, local events, competitor pricing.
The fill rate model runs every morning, not on a reporting calendar. It detects the pattern, traces the cause, and attaches what to do about it before the number reaches a review deck.
Every one of your stores gets its own baseline. Ward scans continuously fill rate, shrinkage %, fresh waste % against it and pulls forward only the deviations that hold up. The two that show up most in grocery retail are fresh waste & spoilage and on-shelf availability gaps, and both are baseline problems before they are P&L problems.
At the metric level. Ward tracks on-shelf availability, backroom-to-shelf replenishment speed, DC delivery reliability, and intra-day depletion curves. The critical insight is separating supply problems from execution problems, since the fix is completely different.
What the first 90 days
actually look like.
-
01
Week 1: connect
Read-only credentials to RELEX Solutions. Ward reads straight from demand forecasts, space plans, workforce forecasts and starts building baselines. First daily cards land inside 48 hours, before baselines are stable, so you can see the shape of the output early.
-
02
Weeks 2 to 3: calibration
Baselines stabilize per store and per category. Ward stops flagging normal variance and starts flagging exceptions. This is the window where the false positive rate drops sharply.
-
03
Weeks 4 to 12: steady state
Ward hands you cards each day, each with root cause and the next step. Volume settles at a level a single person can read over coffee. The measure of success is not how many insight cards arrive, it is how many get acted on.
How Ward connects to RELEX Solutions
Ward integrates with RELEX for unified retail planning. Ward monitors RELEX forecasts against actuals and surfaces planning exceptions as insight cards.
Setup: Ward reads RELEX data via API. Monitors forecast accuracy and flags exceptions before they compound.
Data Ward reads from RELEX
Impact metrics with RELEX
Data lake enrichment
Ward enriches RELEX data with: RELEX forecasts, POS actuals, Weather & events, Demographic data, Supplier performance
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture.
- ×Business sponsor already chose the vendor. You inherit the security review
- ×Every AI vendor wants write access and a copy of the production data
- ×Model lock-in means rewriting the stack when GPT or Claude moves again
- ×Audit trail is an afterthought. Compliance has nothing to pull on
- ×Data lake project keeps getting bumped for the next thing the business wants
- ✓Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake
- ✓Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent
- ✓LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys
- ✓Every query, every model, every source logged. SIEM-ready audit output
- ✓VPC peering, PrivateLink, SOC 2 II. Your security review is short
74% of enterprise AI projects stall before production. Integration debt and security review are the top two reasons. Source: Gartner
Grocery KPI impact
Frequently asked questions
Ward monitors on-shelf availability across your entire estate and flags stores or categories dropping below threshold. For Grocery retail specifically, Ward monitors 30,000+ SKUs across your stores and delivers automated insight cards with root cause analysis and recommended actions.
Ward tracks Fill rate, Shrinkage %, Fresh waste %, Promo lift, Basket size at the store-category level. Ward tracks expected vs actual on-shelf availability at the store-category level and escalates when fill rate drops below configurable thresholds.
Ward reads RELEX data via API. Monitors forecast accuracy and flags exceptions before they compound. Data points include: Demand forecasts, Space plans, Workforce forecasts, Promotion plans, Replenishment orders.
Yes. Ward reads RELEX data and combines it with contextual signals (weather, events, demographics) to generate Grocery-specific insight cards. No custom development required.
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake. Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent. LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys.
Ward delivers daily insight cards covering Fill rate, Shrinkage %, Fresh waste %, tailored for Technology decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.
Ward tracks on-shelf availability, backroom-to-shelf replenishment speed, DC delivery reliability, and intra-day depletion curves. The critical insight is separating supply problems from execution problems, since the fix is completely different.
Ward's morning fill rate card shows the estate is healthy overall, but flags seven stores below threshold. It attributes root cause for each: late DC deliveries for some (already en route), a supplier fill rate issue on dairy for others, and an afternoon depletion pattern in produce at two stores suggesting insufficient replenishment labor during the mid-shift window. The VP acts on the labor issues and monitors the rest in under five minutes.
First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.
No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.
Related solutions
See what Grocery fill rate problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.