Pricing · Tableau · Head of LP

Head of LP: pricing straight off Tableau

Ward pulls from tableau Hyper extracts, underlying database (direct), published data source metadata from Tableau, runs pricing on it, and returns the loss prevention read daily.

Price Optimization on Tableau, for loss prevention

Shrinkage costs you more than you think. Ward finds out where. Ward writes the finding at the altitude a Head of LP works at.

Price Optimization. Ward monitors price elasticity shifts in real time and recommends adjustments that protect margin without sacrificing volume.

The mechanism. Ward continuously measures price elasticity by category, tracks competitive pricing signals, and models the margin-volume tradeoff.

Setup: Ward connects to the same databases Tableau uses. Or reads Tableau Server metadata via REST API for context.

What you get

  • Margin-volume tradeoff modeling
  • Real-time elasticity measurement
  • Category-level price sensitivity
  • Competitive price monitoring
app.getward.ai Live demo
Acme Retail @Merchandising: VP Analyst claude-sonnet default
A

Chat

Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.

Why did Store 37 miss target last week?
You · 9:42 AM
Schema Scout · routed to Merchandising Agent

I pulled Store 37’s last 28 days against the chain baseline. Two root causes, both compounding.

SignalFinding
labor_efficiencyRev/labor-hour −22% vs. cluster, staffing mismatch at 11a–1p peak
inventory.freshFresh fill 83%, backroom replenishment lag at 2–4p
promo.liftBOGO crackers cannibalized Brand Y by 28%, net category +6%

Recommend: re-baseline Store 37 schedule against true peak, raise replen window to 1p, and review the BOGO before next cycle.

8 parallel queries 3 sources cited confidence 0.92
Show me how to fix the staffing mismatch.
You · 9:43 AM
Labor Agent · drafting schedule diff
Querying labor_scheduling
Ask anything, Ward routes to the right agent. Cmd+K

Reporting

Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.

7d13w52w
Revenue vs. forecast
$48.2M
+4.2% WoW
Gross margin %
24.1%
−3.2pp
Fill rate, fresh
83.4%
−4.1pp
Shrink, West region
2.41%
+0.8pp
Revenue vs. forecast 13 weeks actual, 6 weeks forecast, 80% interval
Actual Forecast 80% interval
% of plan 106 94 100 forecast → W−13 W−5 today +6wk
Holt-Winters + weather regressor MAPE 4.1% at 4wk Backtested 24 months Crosses plan in 3 weeks
Forecast error by horizon MAPE, 24-month backtest
1wk 2.1%
2wk 3.0%
4wk 4.1%
8wk 6.3%
13wk 8.9%
Accuracy bar for promo decisions: ≤5% at 4wk
Models in production Every forecast ships a model card
ModelHorizonMAPE
holt_winters4wk4.1%
arima_sarimax13wk8.9%
gbm_demand1wk2.1%
bayes_hiernew store11.4%

Sources

Connect external systems to the data lake.

NameTypeLast sync
sap_pos_transactionsimport2m ago
sap_inventory_shrinkageimport2m ago
sap_labor_schedulingimport14m ago
retail_inventory_weeklyimport1h ago
retail_google_ads_dailyimport1h ago
retail_meta_ads_dailyimport1h ago
retail_ga4_website_dailyimport1h ago

Policies

Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.

TLS 1.3 AES-256 Read-only SOC 2 II
Policy IDEffectResources
merch-read-defaultpermitModel::*
finance-read-shrinkagepermitModel::"inventory_shrinkage"
vendor-blockedforbidModel::"labor_*"
region-west-onlypermitTenant::"acme"
Pricing on Tableau data, live product demo.

What Ward has eyes on.

The pricing model runs each day, not on a reporting calendar. It picks up the pattern, explains what caused it, and attaches a recommended move before the number reaches a review deck.

Ward reads tableau Hyper extracts, underlying database (direct), published data source metadata from Tableau on a read-only connection. Nothing is written back, and your BI configuration does not change. Tableau stays the system of record.

Why this combination
is its own problem.

A Head of LP does not need the pricing model explained. They need to know which stores moved, why, and what to do by end of day. Ward writes the finding at that altitude.

What the first 90 days
actually look like.

  1. 01

    Week 1: connect

    Read-only credentials to Tableau. Ward pulls from tableau Hyper extracts, underlying database (direct), published data source metadata and starts building baselines. First insight cards land inside 48 hours, before baselines are stable, so you can see the shape of the output early.

  2. 02

    Weeks 2 to 3: calibration

    Baselines stabilize per store and per category. Ward stops flagging normal variance and starts flagging exceptions. This is the window where the false positive rate drops sharply.

  3. 03

    Weeks 4 to 12: steady state

    Ward hands you daily cards daily, each with root cause and a recommended move. Volume settles at a level a single person can read over coffee. The measure of success is not how many insight cards arrive, it is how many get acted on.

How Ward connects to Tableau

Ward does not replace Tableau. Ward adds the proactive layer Tableau lacks. When a metric moves, Ward explains why and recommends action.

Setup: Ward connects to the same databases Tableau uses. Or reads Tableau Server metadata via REST API for context.

Data Ward reads from Tableau

Tableau Hyper extracts
Underlying database (direct)
Published data source metadata

Impact metrics with Tableau

Time to Insight
Cards before dashboards
Anomalies explained before anyone opens Tableau.
Anomaly Detection
Extract-gap coverage
Catches issues between Tableau extract refresh cycles.
Decision Velocity
Investigation eliminated
Root cause embedded in cards; no ad-hoc queries needed.
Analyst Productivity
Detection work offloaded
Analysts freed from triage to focus on strategic work.

Data lake enrichment

Ward enriches Tableau data with: Tableau data sources, Underlying database, Weather & events, Competitor pricing, Customer data

Shrinkage costs you more than you think. Ward finds out where.

Pain points
  • ×Shrinkage lands as a year-end surprise
  • ×Cannot distinguish theft from spoilage from admin error
  • ×High-shrinkage stores only identified during audits
  • ×No correlation between operational changes and loss patterns
  • ×Exception-based reporting misses slow-bleed patterns
How Ward helps
  • Store-level shrinkage tracking with cause attribution
  • Anomaly detection flags stores deviating from estate average
  • Receiving dock discrepancy patterns identified automatically
  • Correlation analysis links operational changes to loss shifts
  • Trend analysis catches slow-bleed patterns audits miss

US retail shrinkage hit $112.1 billion in 2022. Up 19.4% year over year. Source: National Retail Federation

Frequently asked questions

Ward connects to the same databases Tableau uses. Or reads Tableau Server metadata via REST API for context. Data points include: Tableau Hyper extracts, Underlying database (direct), Published data source metadata.

Shrinkage costs you more than you think. Ward finds out where. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Store-level shrinkage tracking with cause attribution. Anomaly detection flags stores deviating from estate average. Receiving dock discrepancy patterns identified automatically.

First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.

No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.

See what pricing problems Ward catches.

Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.

Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly

Find out what your data has been hiding.

Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.

Step 1 of 3
What are your goals?
Step 2 of 3
About your operation
Step 3 of 3
Your contact info