Ward and Looker for Specialty technology
A specialty Head of IT running Looker gets CLV, conversion rate, units per transaction tracks on a daily cycle, with the cause attached.
What a specialty Head of IT gets from Looker / Looker Studio
Applied to Specialty Retail, the surface area is 5,000+ SKUs over boutiques. High-consideration purchases, curated assortments, and customer lifetime value. Ward tracks the metrics that matter for margin-rich retail.
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward hands you insight cards scoped to technology decision-making.
Setup: Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled traffic against conversion by hour for the four flagships. Traffic is fine. The gap is coverage and depth.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
traffic_conversion | Conversion 18.4% vs. 23.1% chain, all of the gap in 12–2p and 5–7p |
labor.coverage | One associate on the floor through both peaks at 3 of 4 doors |
inventory.depth | Top 20 styles at 1.4 units per size, walk-away rate +9% |
Recommend: add floor coverage to both peak windows, deepen the top 20 styles to three per size at the flagships, and route the walk-away list to clienteling.
traffic_conversion…
Reporting
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.
| Model | Horizon | MAPE |
|---|---|---|
holt_winters | 4wk | 4.1% |
arima_sarimax | 13wk | 8.9% |
gbm_demand | 1wk | 2.1% |
bayes_hier | new store | 11.4% |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
shopify_orders_daily | import | 2m ago |
lightspeed_store_sales | import | 2m ago |
netsuite_inventory_snapshot | import | 14m ago |
retail_customer_ltv | import | 1h ago |
retail_traffic_conversion | import | 1h ago |
retail_clienteling_log | import | 1h ago |
retail_ga4_website_daily | import | 1h ago |
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
ops-read-default | permit | Model::* |
crm-read-ltv | permit | Model::"customer_ltv" |
associate-pii-blocked | forbid | Model::"customer_pii" |
merch-read-assortment | permit | Model::"sales_by_tier" |
What Ward delivers
- Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake
- Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent
- LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys
- Every query, every model, every source logged. SIEM-ready audit output
- VPC peering, PrivateLink, SOC 2 II. Your security review is short
Metrics Ward monitors
Specialty challenges Ward solves
- Assortment curation
- Customer lifetime value
- Staff selling effectiveness
- Clienteling optimization
- Inventory depth vs breadth
Why this combination
is its own problem.
Running Ward on Looker in a specialty estate skips the usual first step. There is no ingestion project, because Looker / Looker Studio already holds looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata. Ward ingests what is there.
What Ward has eyes on.
Every one of your boutiques gets its own baseline. Ward scans continuously CLV, conversion rate, units per transaction against it and surfaces only the deviations that hold up. The two that show up most in specialty retail are assortment curation and customer lifetime value, and both are baseline problems before they are P&L problems.
The connection to Looker / Looker Studio is read-only and runs on your schedule. Ward pulls from looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), and the rest of the feed, then combines it with external context your BI does not carry: weather, local events, competitor pricing.
What the first 90 days
actually look like.
-
01
Week 1: read-only connection
Ward connects to Looker / Looker Studio with read-only credentials and begins ingesting looker API for query results and underlying database (direct). No config changes on your side. First findings arrive within 48 hours.
-
02
Weeks 2 to 3: baselines
Ward needs roughly two weeks of history per store to separate a real deviation from normal variance. During this window the findings are directionally right and the thresholds are still moving.
-
03
Weeks 4 to 12: operating rhythm
Daily cards arrive daily and get triaged like any other queue. Most teams find the volume settles into something one person clears in ten minutes. What matters is the action rate, not the alert count.
How Ward connects to Looker / Looker Studio
Ward does not replace Looker. Ward watches the same data Looker visualizes and proactively alerts when something changes. Your dashboards stay. Ward adds intelligence.
Setup: Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
Data Ward reads from Looker
Impact metrics with Looker
Data lake enrichment
Ward enriches Looker data with: Looker query results, Underlying database, Weather & events, Competitor data, Customer segments
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture.
- ×Business sponsor already chose the vendor. You inherit the security review
- ×Every AI vendor wants write access and a copy of the production data
- ×Model lock-in means rewriting the stack when GPT or Claude moves again
- ×Audit trail is an afterthought. Compliance has nothing to pull on
- ×Data lake project keeps getting bumped for the next thing the business wants
- ✓Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake
- ✓Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent
- ✓LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys
- ✓Every query, every model, every source logged. SIEM-ready audit output
- ✓VPC peering, PrivateLink, SOC 2 II. Your security review is short
74% of enterprise AI projects stall before production. Integration debt and security review are the top two reasons. Source: Gartner
Specialty KPI impact
Frequently asked questions
Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses. Data points include: Looker API for query results, Underlying database (direct), LookML model metadata.
Yes. Ward reads Looker data and combines it with contextual signals (weather, events, demographics) to generate Specialty-specific insight cards. No custom development required.
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake. Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent. LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys.
Ward delivers daily insight cards covering CLV, Conversion rate, Units per transaction, tailored for Technology decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.
First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.
No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.
Related solutions
See what Specialty problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.