Specialty shrinkage from Looker, briefed to technology
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward picks up specialty shrinkage movement in your Looker data in time to act, with the cause and a recommended move attached.
Shrinkage Detection for Specialty on Looker, scoped to technology
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward filters to what a Head of IT can act on and drops the rest.
What shrinkage detection does: Ward identifies abnormal inventory loss patterns and distinguishes between theft, damage, spoilage, and administrative error.
Applied to Specialty Retail, the surface area is 5,000+ SKUs across boutiques. High-consideration purchases, curated assortments, and customer lifetime value. Ward tracks the metrics that matter for margin-rich retail.
How it runs. Ward compares expected inventory against actual counts, segments loss by cause category, and flags store-level anomalies against your estate baseline.
Getting the data in. Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
What you get
- Store-vs-estate benchmarking
- Receiving dock anomaly detection
- Pattern recognition across time
- Cause-level shrinkage attribution
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled traffic against conversion by hour for the four flagships. Traffic is fine. The gap is coverage and depth.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
traffic_conversion | Conversion 18.4% vs. 23.1% chain, all of the gap in 12–2p and 5–7p |
labor.coverage | One associate on the floor through both peaks at 3 of 4 doors |
inventory.depth | Top 20 styles at 1.4 units per size, walk-away rate +9% |
Recommend: add floor coverage to both peak windows, deepen the top 20 styles to three per size at the flagships, and route the walk-away list to clienteling.
traffic_conversion…
Reporting
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.
| Model | Horizon | MAPE |
|---|---|---|
holt_winters | 4wk | 4.1% |
arima_sarimax | 13wk | 8.9% |
gbm_demand | 1wk | 2.1% |
bayes_hier | new store | 11.4% |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
shopify_orders_daily | import | 2m ago |
lightspeed_store_sales | import | 2m ago |
netsuite_inventory_snapshot | import | 14m ago |
retail_customer_ltv | import | 1h ago |
retail_traffic_conversion | import | 1h ago |
retail_clienteling_log | import | 1h ago |
retail_ga4_website_daily | import | 1h ago |
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
ops-read-default | permit | Model::* |
crm-read-ltv | permit | Model::"customer_ltv" |
associate-pii-blocked | forbid | Model::"customer_pii" |
merch-read-assortment | permit | Model::"sales_by_tier" |
Why Shrinkage matters for Specialty retail
With manageable SKU counts, specialty retail can track inventory discrepancies at the individual item level, revealing patterns tied to specific shelf positions, staffing configurations, or time windows that aggregate reporting would never surface. Per-unit loss is high enough that each incident matters.
What Ward has eyes on.
Find the leak before it drains you. Ward runs the model continuously rather than on a reporting cycle, which is why a finding lands the morning the pattern starts instead of at the end of the period.
Every one of your boutiques gets its own baseline. Ward watches CLV, conversion rate, units per transaction against it and brings up only the deviations that hold up. The two that show up most in specialty retail are assortment curation and customer lifetime value, and both are baseline problems before they are P&L problems.
Ward reads looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata from Looker / Looker Studio on a read-only connection. Nothing is written back, and your BI configuration does not change. Looker stays the system of record.
At the metric level. Ward uses item-level tracking feasible at the 5K-SKU scale, maps loss to store layout and traffic flow, and monitors high-value item movement between floor and backroom.
Why this combination
is its own problem.
Shrinkage Detection produces a lot of output that is technically correct and operationally useless to technology. Ward filters on whether the finding changes a decision a Head of IT can actually make.
- 01 High-traffic mall and tourist locations have fundamentally different staffing-to-traffic ratios than standalone stores; loss patterns track to the staffing density rather than the brand or category.
- 02 Tester-adjacent units in beauty and fragrance categories have 3-7x the standard shrink rate; this isn't modeled in chain-wide shrink expectations.
Benchmarks. Specialty retail shrink: 1.0-2.0% standalone, 1.8-3.5% mall and tourist locations. High-value, easily concealable categories (premium fragrance, jewelry, small electronics) drive 40-65% of dollar shrink despite 5-15% of unit volume.
What the first 90 days
actually look like.
-
01
Week 1: read-only connection
Ward sits on top of Looker / Looker Studio with read-only credentials and begins ingesting looker API for query results and underlying database (direct). No config changes on your side. First daily cards arrive within 48 hours.
-
02
Weeks 2 to 3: baselines
Ward needs roughly two weeks of history per store to separate a real deviation from normal variance. During this window the cards are directionally right and the thresholds are still moving.
-
03
Weeks 4 to 12: steady state
Ward hands back findings each day, each with root cause and a recommended action. Volume settles at a level a single person can read over coffee. The measure of success is not how many cards arrive, it is how many get acted on.
How Ward connects to Looker / Looker Studio
Ward does not replace Looker. Ward watches the same data Looker visualizes and proactively alerts when something changes. Your dashboards stay. Ward adds intelligence.
Setup: Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
Data Ward reads from Looker
Impact metrics with Looker
Data lake enrichment
Ward enriches Looker data with: Looker query results, Underlying database, Weather & events, Competitor data, Customer segments
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture.
- ×Business sponsor already chose the vendor. You inherit the security review
- ×Every AI vendor wants write access and a copy of the production data
- ×Model lock-in means rewriting the stack when GPT or Claude moves again
- ×Audit trail is an afterthought. Compliance has nothing to pull on
- ×Data lake project keeps getting bumped for the next thing the business wants
- ✓Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake
- ✓Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent
- ✓LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys
- ✓Every query, every model, every source logged. SIEM-ready audit output
- ✓VPC peering, PrivateLink, SOC 2 II. Your security review is short
74% of enterprise AI projects stall before production. Integration debt and security review are the top two reasons. Source: Gartner
Specialty KPI impact
Frequently asked questions
Ward identifies abnormal inventory loss patterns and distinguishes between theft, damage, spoilage, and administrative error. For Specialty retail specifically, Ward monitors 5,000+ SKUs across your boutiques and delivers automated insight cards with root cause analysis and recommended actions.
Ward tracks CLV, Conversion rate, Units per transaction, Repeat purchase rate, Sell-through by tier at the store-category level. Ward compares expected inventory against actual counts, segments loss by cause category, and flags store-level anomalies against your estate baseline.
Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses. Data points include: Looker API for query results, Underlying database (direct), LookML model metadata.
Yes. Ward reads Looker data and combines it with contextual signals (weather, events, demographics) to generate Specialty-specific insight cards. No custom development required.
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake. Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent. LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys.
Ward delivers daily insight cards covering CLV, Conversion rate, Units per transaction, tailored for Technology decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.
Ward uses item-level tracking feasible at the 5K-SKU scale, maps loss to store layout and traffic flow, and monitors high-value item movement between floor and backroom.
Ward flags premium fragrance shrinkage running far above average at high-traffic mall locations. The loss concentrates on tester-adjacent units during weekend afternoons when staff-to-customer ratios drop. Ward recommends relocating premium fragrances behind the counter and adding floor coverage during peak windows. Implementation brings shrinkage back toward standalone-store levels.
First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.
No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.
Related solutions
See what Specialty shrinkage problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.