Fill Rate · Lightspeed · Head of IT

Lightspeed plus Ward: fill rate for a Head of IT

Every empty shelf is a lost sale. Ward runs it off Lightspeed, scoped to what a Head of IT owns.

How a Head of IT runs fill rate off Lightspeed Retail

The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward writes the finding at the altitude a Head of IT works at.

Fill Rate Monitoring. Ward monitors on-shelf availability across your entire estate and flags stores or categories dropping below threshold.

Under the hood. Ward tracks expected vs actual on-shelf availability at the store-category level and escalates when fill rate drops below configurable thresholds.

Setup: Ward connects via Lightspeed Retail API. OAuth-based authentication. Read-only access.

What it does

  • Store-vs-estate benchmarking
  • Category-level drill-down
  • Estate-wide fill rate dashboard
  • Threshold-based alerting
app.getward.ai Live demo
Acme Retail @Merchandising: VP Analyst claude-sonnet default
A

Chat

Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.

Why did Store 37 miss target last week?
You · 9:42 AM
Schema Scout · routed to Merchandising Agent

I pulled Store 37’s last 28 days against the chain baseline. Two root causes, both compounding.

SignalFinding
labor_efficiencyRev/labor-hour −22% vs. cluster, staffing mismatch at 11a–1p peak
inventory.freshFresh fill 83%, backroom replenishment lag at 2–4p
promo.liftBOGO crackers cannibalized Brand Y by 28%, net category +6%

Recommend: re-baseline Store 37 schedule against true peak, raise replen window to 1p, and review the BOGO before next cycle.

8 parallel queries 3 sources cited confidence 0.92
Show me how to fix the staffing mismatch.
You · 9:43 AM
Labor Agent · drafting schedule diff
Querying labor_scheduling
Ask anything, Ward routes to the right agent. Cmd+K

Reporting

Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.

7d13w52w
Revenue vs. forecast
$48.2M
+4.2% WoW
Gross margin %
24.1%
−3.2pp
Fill rate, fresh
83.4%
−4.1pp
Shrink, West region
2.41%
+0.8pp
Revenue vs. forecast 13 weeks actual, 6 weeks forecast, 80% interval
Actual Forecast 80% interval
% of plan 106 94 100 forecast → W−13 W−5 today +6wk
Holt-Winters + weather regressor MAPE 4.1% at 4wk Backtested 24 months Crosses plan in 3 weeks
Forecast error by horizon MAPE, 24-month backtest
1wk 2.1%
2wk 3.0%
4wk 4.1%
8wk 6.3%
13wk 8.9%
Accuracy bar for promo decisions: ≤5% at 4wk
Models in production Every forecast ships a model card
ModelHorizonMAPE
holt_winters4wk4.1%
arima_sarimax13wk8.9%
gbm_demand1wk2.1%
bayes_hiernew store11.4%

Sources

Connect external systems to the data lake.

NameTypeLast sync
sap_pos_transactionsimport2m ago
sap_inventory_shrinkageimport2m ago
sap_labor_schedulingimport14m ago
retail_inventory_weeklyimport1h ago
retail_google_ads_dailyimport1h ago
retail_meta_ads_dailyimport1h ago
retail_ga4_website_dailyimport1h ago

Policies

Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.

TLS 1.3 AES-256 Read-only SOC 2 II
Policy IDEffectResources
merch-read-defaultpermitModel::*
finance-read-shrinkagepermitModel::"inventory_shrinkage"
vendor-blockedforbidModel::"labor_*"
region-west-onlypermitTenant::"acme"
Fill Rate on Lightspeed data, live product demo.

What Ward has eyes on.

The connection to Lightspeed Retail is read-only and runs on your schedule. Ward pulls from sales transactions, inventory counts, and the rest of the feed, then stitches together it with external context your POS does not carry: weather, local events, competitor pricing.

The fill rate model runs every morning, not on a reporting calendar. It spots the pattern, accounts for root cause, and attaches the next step before the number reaches a review deck.

Why this combination
is its own problem.

Fill Rate Monitoring produces a lot of output that is technically correct and operationally useless to technology. Ward filters on whether the finding changes a decision a Head of IT can actually make.

What the first 90 days
actually look like.

  1. 01

    Week 1: connect

    Read-only credentials to Lightspeed Retail. Ward pulls from sales transactions, inventory counts, customer profiles and starts building baselines. First findings land inside 48 hours, before baselines are stable, so you can see the shape of the output early.

  2. 02

    Weeks 2 to 3: calibration

    Baselines stabilize per store and per category. Ward stops flagging normal variance and starts flagging exceptions. This is the window where the false positive rate drops sharply.

  3. 03

    Weeks 4 to 12: operating rhythm

    Daily cards arrive daily and get triaged like any other queue. Most teams find the volume settles into something one person clears in ten minutes. What matters is the action rate, not the alert count.

How Ward connects to Lightspeed Retail

Ward integrates with Lightspeed Retail POS for specialty and boutique retailers. In-store transaction data powers customer behavior and assortment insight cards.

Setup: Ward connects via Lightspeed Retail API. OAuth-based authentication. Read-only access.

Data Ward reads from Lightspeed

Sales transactions
Inventory counts
Customer profiles
Purchase orders
Employee performance

Impact metrics with Lightspeed

Customer LTV
Lapsing buyers flagged
Purchase cadence and segment data reveal re-engagement windows.
Conversion Rate
Staffing-timing link found
Transaction data reveals which staff and hour combos convert.
Revenue per SKU
Whitespace identified
Underperformers and assortment gaps surfaced from sales data.
Inventory Accuracy
Count-to-velocity matched
Inventory counts reconciled against POS sell-through live.

Data lake enrichment

Ward enriches Lightspeed data with: Sales transactions, Customer profiles, Weather & events, Competitor data, Demographic data

The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture.

Pain points
  • ×Business sponsor already chose the vendor. You inherit the security review
  • ×Every AI vendor wants write access and a copy of the production data
  • ×Model lock-in means rewriting the stack when GPT or Claude moves again
  • ×Audit trail is an afterthought. Compliance has nothing to pull on
  • ×Data lake project keeps getting bumped for the next thing the business wants
How Ward helps
  • Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake
  • Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent
  • LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys
  • Every query, every model, every source logged. SIEM-ready audit output
  • VPC peering, PrivateLink, SOC 2 II. Your security review is short

74% of enterprise AI projects stall before production. Integration debt and security review are the top two reasons. Source: Gartner

Frequently asked questions

Ward connects via Lightspeed Retail API. OAuth-based authentication. Read-only access. Data points include: Sales transactions, Inventory counts, Customer profiles, Purchase orders, Employee performance.

The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake. Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent. LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys.

First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.

No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.

See what fill rate problems Ward catches.

Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.

Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly

Find out what your data has been hiding.

Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.

Step 1 of 3
What are your goals?
Step 2 of 3
About your operation
Step 3 of 3
Your contact info