Fill Rate Monitoring for Head of IT / VP Technology, read from Oracle Retail
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward detects fill rate movement in your Oracle data and traces what caused it.
Fill Rate Monitoring on Oracle, for technology
Fill Rate Monitoring is a card type Ward runs continuously. Ward monitors on-shelf availability across your entire estate and flags stores or categories dropping below threshold.
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward delivers insight cards scoped to technology decision-making.
How it runs. Ward tracks expected vs actual on-shelf availability at the store-category level and escalates when fill rate drops below configurable thresholds.
Setup: Ward reads from Oracle Retail via REST APIs or direct database views. Compatible with Oracle Cloud and on-premise deployments.
Key capabilities
- Category-level drill-down
- Estate-wide fill rate dashboard
- Threshold-based alerting
- Store-vs-estate benchmarking
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled Store 37’s last 28 days against the chain baseline. Two root causes, both compounding.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
labor_efficiency | Rev/labor-hour −22% vs. cluster, staffing mismatch at 11a–1p peak |
inventory.fresh | Fresh fill 83%, backroom replenishment lag at 2–4p |
promo.lift | BOGO crackers cannibalized Brand Y by 28%, net category +6% |
Recommend: re-baseline Store 37 schedule against true peak, raise replen window to 1p, and review the BOGO before next cycle.
labor_scheduling…
Reporting
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.
| Model | Horizon | MAPE |
|---|---|---|
holt_winters | 4wk | 4.1% |
arima_sarimax | 13wk | 8.9% |
gbm_demand | 1wk | 2.1% |
bayes_hier | new store | 11.4% |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
sap_pos_transactions | import | 2m ago |
sap_inventory_shrinkage | import | 2m ago |
sap_labor_scheduling | import | 14m ago |
retail_inventory_weekly | import | 1h ago |
retail_google_ads_daily | import | 1h ago |
retail_meta_ads_daily | import | 1h ago |
retail_ga4_website_daily | import | 1h ago |
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
merch-read-default | permit | Model::* |
finance-read-shrinkage | permit | Model::"inventory_shrinkage" |
vendor-blocked | forbid | Model::"labor_*" |
region-west-only | permit | Tenant::"acme" |
What Ward has eyes on.
Ward pulls from sales audit, inventory positions, allocation from Oracle Retail on a read-only connection. Nothing is written back, and your ERP configuration does not change. Oracle stays the system of record.
The fill rate model runs on a daily cycle, not on a reporting calendar. It picks up the pattern, traces what caused it, and attaches the next step before the number reaches a review deck.
Why this combination
is its own problem.
Oracle Retail was built for transactions, not for technology decisions. The data is right there and it is in the wrong shape. Ward pulls from sales audit and inventory positions and rewrites them as a decision.
What the first 90 days
actually look like.
-
01
Week 1: connect
Read-only credentials to Oracle Retail. Ward reads straight from sales audit, inventory positions, allocation and starts building baselines. First insight cards land inside 48 hours, before baselines are stable, so you can see the shape of the output early.
-
02
Weeks 2 to 3: calibration
Baselines stabilize per store and per category. Ward stops flagging normal variance and starts flagging exceptions. This is the window where the false positive rate drops sharply.
-
03
Weeks 4 to 12: steady state
Ward sends daily cards each day, each with the driver and a recommended action. Volume settles at a level a single person can read over coffee. The measure of success is not how many cards arrive, it is how many get acted on.
How Ward connects to Oracle Retail
Ward integrates with Oracle Retail Merchandising (RMFCS), Oracle Retail Demand Forecasting, and Oracle Retail Analytics. Full stack visibility.
Setup: Ward reads from Oracle Retail via REST APIs or direct database views. Compatible with Oracle Cloud and on-premise deployments.
Data Ward reads from Oracle
Impact metrics with Oracle
Data lake enrichment
Ward enriches Oracle data with: Sales audit data, Weather & events, Competitor pricing, Demographic data, Supplier scorecards
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture.
- ×Business sponsor already chose the vendor. You inherit the security review
- ×Every AI vendor wants write access and a copy of the production data
- ×Model lock-in means rewriting the stack when GPT or Claude moves again
- ×Audit trail is an afterthought. Compliance has nothing to pull on
- ×Data lake project keeps getting bumped for the next thing the business wants
- ✓Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake
- ✓Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent
- ✓LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys
- ✓Every query, every model, every source logged. SIEM-ready audit output
- ✓VPC peering, PrivateLink, SOC 2 II. Your security review is short
74% of enterprise AI projects stall before production. Integration debt and security review are the top two reasons. Source: Gartner
Frequently asked questions
Ward reads from Oracle Retail via REST APIs or direct database views. Compatible with Oracle Cloud and on-premise deployments. Data points include: Sales audit, Inventory positions, Allocation, Replenishment, Demand forecasts, Price management.
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake. Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent. LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys.
First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.
No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.
Related solutions
See what fill rate problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.