Grocery · Pricing · RELEX · Head of LP

Price Optimization: Grocery retail, RELEX data, Loss Prevention decisions

A grocery Head of LP on RELEX should not be hunting for pricing problems. Ward brings up them daily.

How a grocery Head of LP runs pricing on RELEX Solutions

Price Optimization, in one sentence. Ward monitors price elasticity shifts in real time and recommends adjustments that protect margin without sacrificing volume.

A Grocery & Supermarket operator is tracking 30,000+ SKUs throughout stores. Fresh availability, shrinkage, and promo effectiveness across hundreds of stores. Ward monitors perishable turn rates and flags waste before it happens.

Shrinkage costs you more than you think. Ward finds out where. Ward pulls forward the indicators that change a loss prevention decision.

What Ward does with that: Ward continuously measures price elasticity by category, tracks competitive pricing signals, and models the margin-volume tradeoff.

The connection itself. Ward reads RELEX data via API. Monitors forecast accuracy and flags exceptions before they compound.

Capabilities

  • Category-level price sensitivity
  • Competitive price monitoring
  • Margin-volume tradeoff modeling
  • Real-time elasticity measurement
app.getward.ai Live demo
Acme Grocery @Merchandising: Fresh Analyst claude-sonnet default
A

Chat

Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.

Why did Store 37 miss target last week?
You · 9:42 AM
Schema Scout · routed to Merchandising Agent

I pulled Store 37’s last 28 days against the chain baseline. Two root causes, both compounding.

SignalFinding
labor_efficiencyRev/labor-hour −22% vs. cluster, staffing mismatch at 11a–1p peak
inventory.freshFresh fill 83%, backroom replenishment lag at 2–4p
promo.liftBOGO crackers cannibalized Brand Y by 28%, net category +6%

Recommend: re-baseline Store 37 schedule against true peak, raise replen window to 1p, and review the BOGO before next cycle.

8 parallel queries 3 sources cited confidence 0.92
Show me how to fix the staffing mismatch.
You · 9:43 AM
Labor Agent · drafting schedule diff
Querying labor_scheduling
Ask anything, Ward routes to the right agent. Cmd+K

Reporting

Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.

7d13w52w
Revenue vs. forecast
$48.2M
+4.2% WoW
Gross margin, center store
22.6%
−3.2pp
Fill rate, fresh
83.4%
−4.1pp
Shrink, West region
2.41%
+0.8pp
Revenue vs. forecast 13 weeks actual, 6 weeks forecast, 80% interval
Actual Forecast 80% interval
% of plan 106 94 100 forecast → W−13 W−5 today +6wk
Holt-Winters + weather regressor MAPE 4.1% at 4wk Backtested 24 months Crosses plan in 3 weeks
Forecast error by horizon MAPE, 24-month backtest
1wk 2.1%
2wk 3.0%
4wk 4.1%
8wk 6.3%
13wk 8.9%
Accuracy bar for promo decisions: ≤5% at 4wk
Models in production Every forecast ships a model card
ModelHorizonMAPE
holt_winters4wk4.1%
arima_sarimax13wk8.9%
gbm_demand1wk2.1%
bayes_hiernew store11.4%

Sources

Connect external systems to the data lake.

NameTypeLast sync
sap_pos_transactionsimport2m ago
sap_inventory_shrinkageimport2m ago
sap_labor_schedulingimport14m ago
relex_replenishment_planimport1h ago
blue_yonder_forecast_dailyimport1h ago
retail_fresh_waste_dailyimport1h ago
retail_promo_calendarimport1h ago

Policies

Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.

TLS 1.3 AES-256 Read-only SOC 2 II
Policy IDEffectResources
merch-read-defaultpermitModel::*
lp-read-shrinkagepermitModel::"inventory_shrinkage"
vendor-blockedforbidModel::"labor_*"
fresh-team-westpermitModel::"fresh_waste_daily"
Pricing for Grocery on RELEX data, live product demo.

Why Pricing matters for Grocery retail

Grocery pricing walks a razor's edge, a small error on staples like milk or eggs shifts store-level traffic patterns. Ward monitors price elasticity at the category-store level, distinguishing KVIs where sensitivity is acute from margin categories with headroom, so you know which SKUs can absorb a change.

Why this combination
is its own problem.

RELEX Solutions was built for transactions, not for loss prevention decisions. The data is right there and it is in the wrong shape. Ward pulls from demand forecasts and space plans and rewrites them as a decision.

  • 01 Beer and tobacco price changes ripple through unrelated baskets; treating them as standalone categories misses the traffic effect.
  • 02 Chain-level KVI lists are stale within a quarter; the items customers actually compare drift with promo cycles and competitor activity.

Benchmarks. Grocery KVIs (milk, eggs, bread, bananas, gas) carry elasticity in the -1.5 to -2.5 range; tail categories run -0.3 to -0.8. A 1% list price change on KVIs shifts category volume 1.5-2.5% within a week. Most operators have 200-400 KVIs they actively manage; Ward typically finds another 50-150 hidden ones.

What Ward has eyes on.

The pricing model runs each day, not on a reporting calendar. It flags the pattern, accounts for what caused it, and attaches a recommended move before the number reaches a review deck.

Ward tracks 30,000+ SKUs over your stores, at the store-category level rather than the chain roll-up. The metrics under watch include fill rate, shrinkage %, fresh waste %. A roll-up hides a single-store problem inside a healthy average, which is how fresh waste & spoilage stays invisible for a quarter.

The connection to RELEX Solutions is read-only and runs on your schedule. Ward ingests demand forecasts, space plans, and the rest of the feed, then stitches together it with external context your Supply Chain does not carry: weather, local events, competitor pricing.

At the metric level. Ward tracks item-level elasticity by store cluster, competitive KVI price gaps, cross-category basket effects, and promotional cannibalization rates. The critical distinction is between price-sensitive traffic drivers and margin-accretive tail categories.

Signals · POS transactions with line-item prices, competitor price scrapes, ad and circular calendars, basket compositions, loyalty data, and DSD price changes received from vendors.

What the first 90 days
actually look like.

  1. 01

    Week 1: read-only connection

    Ward reads from RELEX Solutions with read-only credentials and begins ingesting demand forecasts and space plans. No config changes on your side. First findings arrive inside the first 48 hours.

  2. 02

    Weeks 2 to 3: calibration

    Baselines stabilize per store and per category. Ward stops flagging normal variance and starts flagging exceptions. This is the window where the false positive rate drops sharply.

  3. 03

    Weeks 4 to 12: operating rhythm

    Daily cards arrive each day and get triaged like any other queue. Most teams find the volume settles into something one person clears in ten minutes. What matters is the action rate, not the alert count.

How Ward connects to RELEX Solutions

Ward integrates with RELEX for unified retail planning. Ward monitors RELEX forecasts against actuals and surfaces planning exceptions as insight cards.

Setup: Ward reads RELEX data via API. Monitors forecast accuracy and flags exceptions before they compound.

Data Ward reads from RELEX

Demand forecasts
Space plans
Workforce forecasts
Promotion plans
Replenishment orders

Impact metrics with RELEX

Forecast Accuracy
Drift flagged per store
Accuracy decay caught before it compounds across locations.
Space Productivity
Planogram gaps exposed
Space plans checked against actual sell-through per fixture.
Replenishment Efficiency
Manual triage reduced
Exceptions ranked by revenue impact and urgency.
Fresh Waste
Perishable ordering tightened
Hyperlocal weather and events sharpen fresh item forecasts.

Data lake enrichment

Ward enriches RELEX data with: RELEX forecasts, POS actuals, Weather & events, Demographic data, Supplier performance

Shrinkage costs you more than you think. Ward finds out where.

Pain points
  • ×Shrinkage lands as a year-end surprise
  • ×Cannot distinguish theft from spoilage from admin error
  • ×High-shrinkage stores only identified during audits
  • ×No correlation between operational changes and loss patterns
  • ×Exception-based reporting misses slow-bleed patterns
How Ward helps
  • Store-level shrinkage tracking with cause attribution
  • Anomaly detection flags stores deviating from estate average
  • Receiving dock discrepancy patterns identified automatically
  • Correlation analysis links operational changes to loss shifts
  • Trend analysis catches slow-bleed patterns audits miss

US retail shrinkage hit $112.1 billion in 2022. Up 19.4% year over year. Source: National Retail Federation

Grocery KPI impact

Shrinkage
Cause-level attribution
Loss prevention shifts from guesswork to targeted intervention.
Fill Rate
24–72hr head start
Stockout prediction cards arrive before customers notice gaps.
Fresh Waste
Flagged before spoilage
Perishable turn rates monitored by store.
Promo ROI
Net lift, not gross
True lift net of cannibalization and pull-forward.

Frequently asked questions

Ward monitors price elasticity shifts in real time and recommends adjustments that protect margin without sacrificing volume. For Grocery retail specifically, Ward monitors 30,000+ SKUs across your stores and delivers automated insight cards with root cause analysis and recommended actions.

Ward tracks Fill rate, Shrinkage %, Fresh waste %, Promo lift, Basket size at the store-category level. Ward continuously measures price elasticity by category, tracks competitive pricing signals, and models the margin-volume tradeoff.

Ward reads RELEX data via API. Monitors forecast accuracy and flags exceptions before they compound. Data points include: Demand forecasts, Space plans, Workforce forecasts, Promotion plans, Replenishment orders.

Yes. Ward reads RELEX data and combines it with contextual signals (weather, events, demographics) to generate Grocery-specific insight cards. No custom development required.

Shrinkage costs you more than you think. Ward finds out where. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Store-level shrinkage tracking with cause attribution. Anomaly detection flags stores deviating from estate average. Receiving dock discrepancy patterns identified automatically.

Ward delivers daily insight cards covering Fill rate, Shrinkage %, Fresh waste %, tailored for Loss Prevention decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.

Ward tracks item-level elasticity by store cluster, competitive KVI price gaps, cross-category basket effects, and promotional cannibalization rates. The critical distinction is between price-sensitive traffic drivers and margin-accretive tail categories.

A national chain drops private-label bread prices in your market. Ward detects the shift within 24 hours and models impact: nearby stores show a traffic decline among bread buyers who also carry full baskets. Ward recommends matching on the highest-velocity bread SKUs while raising prices on complementary deli items where elasticity is low, recovering traffic with a net-positive margin result.

First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.

No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.

See what Grocery pricing problems Ward catches.

Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.

Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly

Find out what your data has been hiding.

Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.

Step 1 of 3
What are your goals?
Step 2 of 3
About your operation
Step 3 of 3
Your contact info