Grocery · Shrinkage · RELEX · Head of LP

Head of LP: grocery shrinkage, read from RELEX Solutions

Find the leak before it drains you. Ward runs it on RELEX data throughout your grocery fleet, scoped to loss prevention.

How a grocery Head of LP runs shrinkage on RELEX Solutions

For Grocery & Supermarket retailers, that means continuous review 30,000+ SKUs over stores. Fresh availability, shrinkage, and promo effectiveness across hundreds of stores. Ward monitors perishable turn rates and flags waste before it happens.

Shrinkage costs you more than you think. Ward finds out where. Ward writes the finding at the altitude a Head of LP works at.

Shrinkage Detection is a card type Ward runs continuously. Ward identifies abnormal inventory loss patterns and distinguishes between theft, damage, spoilage, and administrative error.

What Ward does with that: Ward compares expected inventory against actual counts, segments loss by cause category, and flags store-level anomalies against your estate baseline.

How the connection works. Ward reads RELEX data via API. Monitors forecast accuracy and flags exceptions before they compound.

Capabilities

  • Store-vs-estate benchmarking
  • Receiving dock anomaly detection
  • Pattern recognition across time
  • Cause-level shrinkage attribution
app.getward.ai Live demo
Acme Grocery @Merchandising: Fresh Analyst claude-sonnet default
A

Chat

Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.

Why did Store 37 miss target last week?
You · 9:42 AM
Schema Scout · routed to Merchandising Agent

I pulled Store 37’s last 28 days against the chain baseline. Two root causes, both compounding.

SignalFinding
labor_efficiencyRev/labor-hour −22% vs. cluster, staffing mismatch at 11a–1p peak
inventory.freshFresh fill 83%, backroom replenishment lag at 2–4p
promo.liftBOGO crackers cannibalized Brand Y by 28%, net category +6%

Recommend: re-baseline Store 37 schedule against true peak, raise replen window to 1p, and review the BOGO before next cycle.

8 parallel queries 3 sources cited confidence 0.92
Show me how to fix the staffing mismatch.
You · 9:43 AM
Labor Agent · drafting schedule diff
Querying labor_scheduling
Ask anything, Ward routes to the right agent. Cmd+K

Reporting

Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.

7d13w52w
Revenue vs. forecast
$48.2M
+4.2% WoW
Gross margin, center store
22.6%
−3.2pp
Fill rate, fresh
83.4%
−4.1pp
Shrink, West region
2.41%
+0.8pp
Revenue vs. forecast 13 weeks actual, 6 weeks forecast, 80% interval
Actual Forecast 80% interval
% of plan 106 94 100 forecast → W−13 W−5 today +6wk
Holt-Winters + weather regressor MAPE 4.1% at 4wk Backtested 24 months Crosses plan in 3 weeks
Forecast error by horizon MAPE, 24-month backtest
1wk 2.1%
2wk 3.0%
4wk 4.1%
8wk 6.3%
13wk 8.9%
Accuracy bar for promo decisions: ≤5% at 4wk
Models in production Every forecast ships a model card
ModelHorizonMAPE
holt_winters4wk4.1%
arima_sarimax13wk8.9%
gbm_demand1wk2.1%
bayes_hiernew store11.4%

Sources

Connect external systems to the data lake.

NameTypeLast sync
sap_pos_transactionsimport2m ago
sap_inventory_shrinkageimport2m ago
sap_labor_schedulingimport14m ago
relex_replenishment_planimport1h ago
blue_yonder_forecast_dailyimport1h ago
retail_fresh_waste_dailyimport1h ago
retail_promo_calendarimport1h ago

Policies

Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.

TLS 1.3 AES-256 Read-only SOC 2 II
Policy IDEffectResources
merch-read-defaultpermitModel::*
lp-read-shrinkagepermitModel::"inventory_shrinkage"
vendor-blockedforbidModel::"labor_*"
fresh-team-westpermitModel::"fresh_waste_daily"
Shrinkage for Grocery on RELEX data, live product demo.

Why Shrinkage matters for Grocery retail

Grocery shrinkage splits into theft, spoilage, and admin error, but most retailers can't distinguish the cause until physical inventory. Ward separates these at the store-department level by cross-referencing receiving logs, POS velocity, waste scans, and inventory snapshots to produce cause-attributed shrinkage cards.

What Ward has eyes on.

Every one of your stores gets its own baseline. Ward monitors fill rate, shrinkage %, fresh waste % against it and raises only the deviations that hold up. The two that show up most in grocery retail are fresh waste & spoilage and on-shelf availability gaps, and both are baseline problems before they are P&L problems.

Ward pulls from demand forecasts, space plans, workforce forecasts from RELEX Solutions on a read-only connection. Nothing is written back, and your Supply Chain configuration does not change. RELEX stays the system of record.

Find the leak before it drains you. Ward runs the model continuously rather than on a reporting cycle, which is why a finding lands the morning the pattern starts instead of at the end of the period.

At the metric level. Ward decomposes shrinkage into theft, spoilage, vendor fraud, and admin error, then tracks inventory-to-sales ratios, receiving accuracy, and waste scan compliance by department. Rising shrinkage in a single department usually signals a process failure, not organized crime.

Signals · Inventory snapshots, receiving logs and PO variance, POS voids and no-sales by lane, waste scans, employee shift schedules, and physical inventory reconciliation history.

Why this combination
is its own problem.

RELEX Solutions is the system of record for most grocery operators of your size, which means the signals Ward needs are already there. The gap is not data collection. It is that nobody has time to read demand forecasts and space plans every morning throughout every store.

  • 01 Self-checkout shrinkage is misattributed to staffed-lane theft because the cause-attribution model lumps all front-end voids together.
  • 02 Spoilage in DSD-stocked categories (bread, dairy, beer) is invisible because the vendor owns the markdown decision.

Benchmarks. US grocery shrink averages 2.0-3.0% of sales, with fresh departments running 4-7% and center store closer to 1-2%. A multi-vertical operator is usually surprised to learn shrink concentrates in three departments per store, not chain-wide, which means three targeted fixes recover more than blanket LP spend.

What the first 90 days
actually look like.

  1. 01

    Week 1: connect

    Read-only credentials to RELEX Solutions. Ward reads demand forecasts, space plans, workforce forecasts and starts building baselines. First findings land inside 48 hours, before baselines are stable, so you can see the shape of the output early.

  2. 02

    Weeks 2 to 3: calibration

    Baselines stabilize per store and per category. Ward stops flagging normal variance and starts flagging exceptions. This is the window where the false positive rate drops sharply.

  3. 03

    Weeks 4 to 12: steady state

    Ward sends cards daily, each with the driver and a recommended move. Volume settles at a level a single person can read over coffee. The measure of success is not how many insight cards arrive, it is how many get acted on.

How Ward connects to RELEX Solutions

Ward integrates with RELEX for unified retail planning. Ward monitors RELEX forecasts against actuals and surfaces planning exceptions as insight cards.

Setup: Ward reads RELEX data via API. Monitors forecast accuracy and flags exceptions before they compound.

Data Ward reads from RELEX

Demand forecasts
Space plans
Workforce forecasts
Promotion plans
Replenishment orders

Impact metrics with RELEX

Forecast Accuracy
Drift flagged per store
Accuracy decay caught before it compounds across locations.
Space Productivity
Planogram gaps exposed
Space plans checked against actual sell-through per fixture.
Replenishment Efficiency
Manual triage reduced
Exceptions ranked by revenue impact and urgency.
Fresh Waste
Perishable ordering tightened
Hyperlocal weather and events sharpen fresh item forecasts.

Data lake enrichment

Ward enriches RELEX data with: RELEX forecasts, POS actuals, Weather & events, Demographic data, Supplier performance

Shrinkage costs you more than you think. Ward finds out where.

Pain points
  • ×Shrinkage lands as a year-end surprise
  • ×Cannot distinguish theft from spoilage from admin error
  • ×High-shrinkage stores only identified during audits
  • ×No correlation between operational changes and loss patterns
  • ×Exception-based reporting misses slow-bleed patterns
How Ward helps
  • Store-level shrinkage tracking with cause attribution
  • Anomaly detection flags stores deviating from estate average
  • Receiving dock discrepancy patterns identified automatically
  • Correlation analysis links operational changes to loss shifts
  • Trend analysis catches slow-bleed patterns audits miss

US retail shrinkage hit $112.1 billion in 2022. Up 19.4% year over year. Source: National Retail Federation

Grocery KPI impact

Shrinkage
Cause-level attribution
Loss prevention shifts from guesswork to targeted intervention.
Fill Rate
24–72hr head start
Stockout prediction cards arrive before customers notice gaps.
Fresh Waste
Flagged before spoilage
Perishable turn rates monitored by store.
Promo ROI
Net lift, not gross
True lift net of cannibalization and pull-forward.

Frequently asked questions

Ward identifies abnormal inventory loss patterns and distinguishes between theft, damage, spoilage, and administrative error. For Grocery retail specifically, Ward monitors 30,000+ SKUs across your stores and delivers automated insight cards with root cause analysis and recommended actions.

Ward tracks Fill rate, Shrinkage %, Fresh waste %, Promo lift, Basket size at the store-category level. Ward compares expected inventory against actual counts, segments loss by cause category, and flags store-level anomalies against your estate baseline.

Ward reads RELEX data via API. Monitors forecast accuracy and flags exceptions before they compound. Data points include: Demand forecasts, Space plans, Workforce forecasts, Promotion plans, Replenishment orders.

Yes. Ward reads RELEX data and combines it with contextual signals (weather, events, demographics) to generate Grocery-specific insight cards. No custom development required.

Shrinkage costs you more than you think. Ward finds out where. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Store-level shrinkage tracking with cause attribution. Anomaly detection flags stores deviating from estate average. Receiving dock discrepancy patterns identified automatically.

Ward delivers daily insight cards covering Fill rate, Shrinkage %, Fresh waste %, tailored for Loss Prevention decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.

Ward decomposes shrinkage into theft, spoilage, vendor fraud, and admin error, then tracks inventory-to-sales ratios, receiving accuracy, and waste scan compliance by department. Rising shrinkage in a single department usually signals a process failure, not organized crime.

One store flags elevated shrinkage well above the estate average for two consecutive periods. Traditional LP assumes shoplifting. Ward traces the majority of variance to receiving dock discrepancies in frozen foods, vendor deliveries consistently short against POs. One process fix, mandatory blind receiving, brings the store back in line within six weeks.

First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.

No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.

See what Grocery shrinkage problems Ward catches.

Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.

Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly

Find out what your data has been hiding.

Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.

Step 1 of 3
What are your goals?
Step 2 of 3
About your operation
Step 3 of 3
Your contact info