Assortment Planning for Specialty on Looker, built for technology
Ward pulls from looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata from Looker / Looker Studio, scans continuously assortment over 5,000+ specialty SKUs, and hands you the technology read each day.
The full picture: specialty assortment, Looker data, Technology decisions
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward surfaces the inputs that change a technology decision.
Assortment Planning is a card type Ward runs continuously. Ward analyzes sell-through by store cluster to recommend which SKUs to add, drop, or reallocate.
A Specialty Retail operator is tracking 5,000+ SKUs over boutiques. High-consideration purchases, curated assortments, and customer lifetime value. Ward tracks the metrics that matter for margin-rich retail.
What Ward does with that: Ward clusters stores by demographic, traffic, and sales patterns, then measures SKU performance against cluster benchmarks.
How the connection works. Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
Key capabilities
- SKU rationalization recommendations
- Whitespace opportunity detection
- Planogram optimization inputs
- Store cluster segmentation
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled traffic against conversion by hour for the four flagships. Traffic is fine. The gap is coverage and depth.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
traffic_conversion | Conversion 18.4% vs. 23.1% chain, all of the gap in 12–2p and 5–7p |
labor.coverage | One associate on the floor through both peaks at 3 of 4 doors |
inventory.depth | Top 20 styles at 1.4 units per size, walk-away rate +9% |
Recommend: add floor coverage to both peak windows, deepen the top 20 styles to three per size at the flagships, and route the walk-away list to clienteling.
traffic_conversion…
Reporting
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.
| Model | Horizon | MAPE |
|---|---|---|
holt_winters | 4wk | 4.1% |
arima_sarimax | 13wk | 8.9% |
gbm_demand | 1wk | 2.1% |
bayes_hier | new store | 11.4% |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
shopify_orders_daily | import | 2m ago |
lightspeed_store_sales | import | 2m ago |
netsuite_inventory_snapshot | import | 14m ago |
retail_customer_ltv | import | 1h ago |
retail_traffic_conversion | import | 1h ago |
retail_clienteling_log | import | 1h ago |
retail_ga4_website_daily | import | 1h ago |
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
ops-read-default | permit | Model::* |
crm-read-ltv | permit | Model::"customer_ltv" |
associate-pii-blocked | forbid | Model::"customer_pii" |
merch-read-assortment | permit | Model::"sales_by_tier" |
Why Assortment matters for Specialty retail
In specialty, curation is the product, adding the wrong item dilutes the brand. Ward quantifies the curatorial instinct by scoring which items reinforce the store's point of view through customer fit and companion purchase patterns, and which are dilutive.
What Ward has eyes on.
The assortment model runs each day, not on a reporting calendar. It detects the pattern, explains the cause, and attaches what to do about it before the number reaches a review deck.
Every one of your boutiques gets its own baseline. Ward keeps a running read on CLV, conversion rate, units per transaction against it and raises only the deviations that hold up. The two that show up most in specialty retail are assortment curation and customer lifetime value, and both are baseline problems before they are P&L problems.
Ward reads straight from looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata from Looker / Looker Studio on a read-only connection. Nothing is written back, and your BI configuration does not change. Looker stays the system of record.
At the metric level. Ward tracks assortment coherence, customer-fit scoring, incremental contribution beyond existing assortment, and curatorial dilution risk, the danger of adding items that weaken brand positioning.
Why this combination
is its own problem.
A Head of IT rarely logs into Looker. They read what someone else pulled out of it, two days later. Ward removes the two days and the someone else.
- 01 Assortment additions get evaluated on standalone projected margin without modeling brand-coherence dilution, wrong-customer-segment items can damage long-term equity even when they sell well short-term.
- 02 Customer-fit scoring requires loyalty data many specialty chains under-utilize; without segment-level signal, brand coherence becomes a guess.
Benchmarks. Specialty assortment-coherence-aware planning typically delivers 15-30% higher full-price sell-through on new-item additions and reduces end-of-season markdown by 200-400 bps.
What the first 90 days
actually look like.
-
01
Week 1: connect
Read-only credentials to Looker / Looker Studio. Ward reads straight from looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata and starts building baselines. First daily cards land inside 48 hours, before baselines are stable, so you can see the shape of the output early.
-
02
Weeks 2 to 3: calibration
Baselines stabilize per store and per category. Ward stops flagging normal variance and starts flagging exceptions. This is the window where the false positive rate drops sharply.
-
03
Weeks 4 to 12: operating rhythm
Cards arrive daily and get triaged like any other queue. Most teams find the volume settles into something one person clears in ten minutes. What matters is the action rate, not the alert count.
How Ward connects to Looker / Looker Studio
Ward does not replace Looker. Ward watches the same data Looker visualizes and proactively alerts when something changes. Your dashboards stay. Ward adds intelligence.
Setup: Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
Data Ward reads from Looker
Impact metrics with Looker
Data lake enrichment
Ward enriches Looker data with: Looker query results, Underlying database, Weather & events, Competitor data, Customer segments
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture.
- ×Business sponsor already chose the vendor. You inherit the security review
- ×Every AI vendor wants write access and a copy of the production data
- ×Model lock-in means rewriting the stack when GPT or Claude moves again
- ×Audit trail is an afterthought. Compliance has nothing to pull on
- ×Data lake project keeps getting bumped for the next thing the business wants
- ✓Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake
- ✓Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent
- ✓LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys
- ✓Every query, every model, every source logged. SIEM-ready audit output
- ✓VPC peering, PrivateLink, SOC 2 II. Your security review is short
74% of enterprise AI projects stall before production. Integration debt and security review are the top two reasons. Source: Gartner
Specialty KPI impact
Frequently asked questions
Ward analyzes sell-through by store cluster to recommend which SKUs to add, drop, or reallocate. For Specialty retail specifically, Ward monitors 5,000+ SKUs across your boutiques and delivers automated insight cards with root cause analysis and recommended actions.
Ward tracks CLV, Conversion rate, Units per transaction, Repeat purchase rate, Sell-through by tier at the store-category level. Ward clusters stores by demographic, traffic, and sales patterns, then measures SKU performance against cluster benchmarks.
Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses. Data points include: Looker API for query results, Underlying database (direct), LookML model metadata.
Yes. Ward reads Looker data and combines it with contextual signals (weather, events, demographics) to generate Specialty-specific insight cards. No custom development required.
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake. Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent. LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys.
Ward delivers daily insight cards covering CLV, Conversion rate, Units per transaction, tailored for Technology decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.
Ward tracks assortment coherence, customer-fit scoring, incremental contribution beyond existing assortment, and curatorial dilution risk, the danger of adding items that weaken brand positioning.
A buyer evaluates 60 new SKUs for the fall assortment. Ward scores each on customer fit, basket affinity, and margin contribution after displacement. It separates high-coherence items from those that score well on margin but would attract the wrong customer segment. The buyer selects the high-coherence group and sees meaningfully higher sell-through than prior season additions.
First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.
No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.
Related solutions
See what Specialty assortment problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.