Head of IT: fashion assortment, read from Looker / Looker Studio
Ward pulls from looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata from Looker / Looker Studio, scans continuously assortment across 15,000+ fashion SKUs, and hands you the technology read every morning.
The full picture: fashion assortment, Looker data, Technology decisions
Assortment Planning is a insight card type Ward runs continuously. Ward analyzes sell-through by store cluster to recommend which SKUs to add, drop, or reallocate.
For Fashion & Apparel retailers, that means watching 15,000+ SKUs across locations. Seasonal sell-through, size curve optimization, and markdown timing. Ward monitors style velocity and flags slow movers before the window closes.
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward writes the finding at the altitude a Head of IT works at.
The mechanism. Ward clusters stores by demographic, traffic, and sales patterns, then measures SKU performance against cluster benchmarks.
How the connection works. Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
Capabilities
- Whitespace opportunity detection
- Planogram optimization inputs
- Store cluster segmentation
- SKU rationalization recommendations
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled fall denim against last season’s curve at the same selling week. Two causes, both still fixable this week.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
sell_through | Week 6 sell-through 38% vs. 52% plan, concentrated in 3 of 9 door clusters |
size_curve | Waist 30–32 sold out in 41 doors while 36–38 sits at 71% on hand |
markdown.ladder | First markdown is 3 weeks later than LY, weeks-of-supply now 11.4 |
Recommend: transfer 30–32 out of the 12 overstocked doors, hold the ladder on core indigo, and take the first markdown on light wash now while it still clears at 20%.
sell_through_weekly…
Reporting
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.
| Model | Horizon | MAPE |
|---|---|---|
holt_winters | 4wk | 4.1% |
arima_sarimax | 13wk | 8.9% |
gbm_demand | 1wk | 2.1% |
bayes_hier | new store | 11.4% |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
shopify_orders_daily | import | 2m ago |
shopify_returns_reasons | import | 2m ago |
netsuite_inventory_snapshot | import | 14m ago |
cegid_store_sales | import | 1h ago |
retail_size_curve_actuals | import | 1h ago |
retail_markdown_ladder | import | 1h ago |
retail_ga4_website_daily | import | 1h ago |
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
merch-read-default | permit | Model::* |
finance-read-markdown | permit | Model::"markdown_ladder" |
vendor-blocked | forbid | Model::"labor_*" |
ecom-read-returns | permit | Model::"returns_reasons" |
Why Assortment matters for Fashion retail
Ward doesn't replace the buyer's eye, it sharpens the math behind the buy. Which store clusters need wider assortment with shallow depth? Which need narrow-deep buys with full size runs? Ward analyzes sell-through by cluster, customer segment, and style attribute to recommend architecture that matches how customers actually shop each location.
What Ward has eyes on.
Ward monitors 15,000+ SKUs over your locations, at the store-category level rather than the chain roll-up. The metrics under watch include sell-through rate, markdown %, return rate. A roll-up hides a single-store problem inside a healthy average, which is how markdown timing stays invisible for a quarter.
The connection to Looker / Looker Studio is read-only and runs on your schedule. Ward reads looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), and the rest of the feed, then stitches together it with external context your BI does not carry: weather, local events, competitor pricing.
Stock what sells. Cut what doesn't. Ward runs the model continuously rather than on a reporting cycle, which is why a finding lands the morning the pattern starts instead of at the end of the period.
At the metric level. Ward tracks assortment width vs depth by cluster, style attribute performance, size curve accuracy, and inter-style cannibalization. It measures revenue-per-option to identify when adding more styles dilutes overall performance.
Why this combination
is its own problem.
Assortment Planning needs looker API for query results and underlying database (direct) at minimum. Looker / Looker Studio carries both, at the grain the model needs. That is the whole integration story: no middleware, no staging warehouse, no custom extract.
- 01 Cluster definitions don't account for online inventory pooling; a store next to a strong DC has different effective assortment math than a remote one.
- 02 Cannibalization between similar styles (two black bodycon dresses) is ignored, so the second option doesn't add what its standalone sell-through suggests.
Benchmarks. Fashion option counts vary 2-4x across store clusters in a healthy assortment plan. Cluster-aware planning typically lifts full-price sell-through 2-5 points and reduces end-of-season markdown depth by 100-300 bps.
What the first 90 days
actually look like.
-
01
Week 1: connect
Read-only credentials to Looker / Looker Studio. Ward ingests looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata and starts building baselines. First cards land inside 48 hours, before baselines are stable, so you can see the shape of the output early.
-
02
Weeks 2 to 3: baselines
Ward needs roughly two weeks of history per store to separate a real deviation from normal variance. During this window the cards are directionally right and the thresholds are still moving.
-
03
Weeks 4 to 12: steady state
Ward returns findings daily, each with what caused it and a recommended action. Volume settles at a level a single person can read over coffee. The measure of success is not how many insight cards arrive, it is how many get acted on.
How Ward connects to Looker / Looker Studio
Ward does not replace Looker. Ward watches the same data Looker visualizes and proactively alerts when something changes. Your dashboards stay. Ward adds intelligence.
Setup: Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
Data Ward reads from Looker
Impact metrics with Looker
Data lake enrichment
Ward enriches Looker data with: Looker query results, Underlying database, Weather & events, Competitor data, Customer segments
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture.
- ×Business sponsor already chose the vendor. You inherit the security review
- ×Every AI vendor wants write access and a copy of the production data
- ×Model lock-in means rewriting the stack when GPT or Claude moves again
- ×Audit trail is an afterthought. Compliance has nothing to pull on
- ×Data lake project keeps getting bumped for the next thing the business wants
- ✓Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake
- ✓Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent
- ✓LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys
- ✓Every query, every model, every source logged. SIEM-ready audit output
- ✓VPC peering, PrivateLink, SOC 2 II. Your security review is short
74% of enterprise AI projects stall before production. Integration debt and security review are the top two reasons. Source: Gartner
Fashion KPI impact
Frequently asked questions
Ward analyzes sell-through by store cluster to recommend which SKUs to add, drop, or reallocate. For Fashion retail specifically, Ward monitors 15,000+ SKUs across your locations and delivers automated insight cards with root cause analysis and recommended actions.
Ward tracks Sell-through rate, Markdown %, Return rate, Style velocity, Size accuracy at the store-category level. Ward clusters stores by demographic, traffic, and sales patterns, then measures SKU performance against cluster benchmarks.
Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses. Data points include: Looker API for query results, Underlying database (direct), LookML model metadata.
Yes. Ward reads Looker data and combines it with contextual signals (weather, events, demographics) to generate Fashion-specific insight cards. No custom development required.
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake. Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent. LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys.
Ward delivers daily insight cards covering Sell-through rate, Markdown %, Return rate, tailored for Technology decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.
Ward tracks assortment width vs depth by cluster, style attribute performance, size curve accuracy, and inter-style cannibalization. It measures revenue-per-option to identify when adding more styles dilutes overall performance.
A denim buyer has 200 styles to allocate across 90 stores. Ward reveals that urban flagships convert best with wide assortment at shallow depth, while suburban stores need fewer core styles with full size runs. The current uniform allocation starves variety in urban stores and creates size gaps in suburban ones. A cluster-specific matrix reduces markdown risk while lifting full-price sell-through.
First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.
No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.
Related solutions
See what Fashion assortment problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.