Specialty · Fill Rate · Looker · Head of Procurement

Specialty fill rate from Looker, briefed to procurement

Ward pulls from looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata from Looker / Looker Studio, scans continuously fill rate over 5,000+ specialty SKUs, and returns the procurement read every morning.

Fill Rate Monitoring for Specialty on Looker, scoped to procurement

Fill Rate Monitoring is a insight card type Ward runs continuously. Ward monitors on-shelf availability across your entire estate and flags stores or categories dropping below threshold.

In a Specialty Retail fleet the job is 5,000+ SKUs across boutiques. High-consideration purchases, curated assortments, and customer lifetime value. Ward tracks the metrics that matter for margin-rich retail.

Merchandising wants Ward. You sign the contract. Ward filters to what a Head of Procurement can act on and drops the rest.

What Ward does with that: Ward tracks expected vs actual on-shelf availability at the store-category level and escalates when fill rate drops below configurable thresholds.

Setup: Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.

Capabilities

  • Estate-wide fill rate dashboard
  • Threshold-based alerting
  • Store-vs-estate benchmarking
  • Category-level drill-down
app.getward.ai Live demo
Acme Specialty @Store Ops: Retail Analyst claude-sonnet default
A

Chat

Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.

Why is conversion down at the flagship boutiques?
You · 9:42 AM
Schema Scout · routed to Store Ops Agent

I pulled traffic against conversion by hour for the four flagships. Traffic is fine. The gap is coverage and depth.

SignalFinding
traffic_conversionConversion 18.4% vs. 23.1% chain, all of the gap in 12–2p and 5–7p
labor.coverageOne associate on the floor through both peaks at 3 of 4 doors
inventory.depthTop 20 styles at 1.4 units per size, walk-away rate +9%

Recommend: add floor coverage to both peak windows, deepen the top 20 styles to three per size at the flagships, and route the walk-away list to clienteling.

8 parallel queries 3 sources cited confidence 0.91
Draft the clienteling outreach list.
You · 9:43 AM
Clienteling Agent · drafting outreach list
Querying traffic_conversion
Ask anything, Ward routes to the right agent. Cmd+K

Reporting

Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.

7d13w52w
Revenue vs. plan
$27.5M
+4.4% WoW
Conversion rate
18.3%
−4.7pp
UPT, flagships
2.14
−0.18
At-risk CLV, top decile
$4.1M
−$310K
Revenue vs. plan 13 weeks actual, 6 weeks forecast, 80% interval
Actual Forecast 80% interval
% of plan 106 94 100 forecast → W−13 W−5 today +6wk
Holt-Winters + weather regressor MAPE 4.1% at 4wk Backtested 24 months Crosses plan in 3 weeks
Forecast error by horizon MAPE, 24-month backtest
1wk 2.1%
2wk 3.0%
4wk 4.1%
8wk 6.3%
13wk 8.9%
Accuracy bar for promo decisions: ≤5% at 4wk
Models in production Every forecast ships a model card
ModelHorizonMAPE
holt_winters4wk4.1%
arima_sarimax13wk8.9%
gbm_demand1wk2.1%
bayes_hiernew store11.4%

Sources

Connect external systems to the data lake.

NameTypeLast sync
shopify_orders_dailyimport2m ago
lightspeed_store_salesimport2m ago
netsuite_inventory_snapshotimport14m ago
retail_customer_ltvimport1h ago
retail_traffic_conversionimport1h ago
retail_clienteling_logimport1h ago
retail_ga4_website_dailyimport1h ago

Policies

Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.

TLS 1.3 AES-256 Read-only SOC 2 II
Policy IDEffectResources
ops-read-defaultpermitModel::*
crm-read-ltvpermitModel::"customer_ltv"
associate-pii-blockedforbidModel::"customer_pii"
merch-read-assortmentpermitModel::"sales_by_tier"
Fill Rate for Specialty on Looker data, live product demo.

Why Fill Rate matters for Specialty retail

A 95% fill rate missing the store's signature item is worse than 85% missing only commodity basics. Ward weights fill rate by item importance, signature products, top sellers, and loyalty drivers get priority, preventing the trap where healthy aggregates mask identity-defining stockouts.

Why this combination
is its own problem.

A Head of Procurement does not need the fill rate model explained. They need to know which stores moved, why, and what to do by end of day. Ward writes the finding at that altitude.

  • 01 Halo basket effects from signature items aren't measured, so the cost of a signature stockout is undercounted by 2-4x because the missed basket-pull revenue is invisible.
  • 02 Time-of-day availability isn't modeled in standard fill rate dashboards; an item available at 10 AM and gone by 2 PM looks "in stock" on daily snapshots.

Benchmarks. Specialty signature-item availability target: 95-98%. Halo effect: signature-item-driven baskets typically run 1.5-2.5x larger than non-anchor baskets, so each signature stockout costs 2-3x its standalone revenue impact.

What Ward has eyes on.

Every one of your boutiques gets its own baseline. Ward scans continuously CLV, conversion rate, units per transaction against it and brings up only the deviations that hold up. The two that show up most in specialty retail are assortment curation and customer lifetime value, and both are baseline problems before they are P&L problems.

Ward pulls from looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata from Looker / Looker Studio on a read-only connection. Nothing is written back, and your BI configuration does not change. Looker stays the system of record.

The fill rate model runs every morning, not on a reporting calendar. It catches the pattern, attributes the cause, and attaches the next step before the number reaches a review deck.

At the metric level. Ward uses weighted availability scoring (signature items weighted highest, commodity basics lowest), tracks time-of-day availability for high-demand items, and measures the halo effect of signature product availability on overall basket value.

Signals · POS at hour-store-SKU, signature-item tagging, on-hand inventory, production schedules where applicable (bakery, prepared foods), and basket-companion patterns.

What the first 90 days
actually look like.

  1. 01

    Week 1: connect

    Read-only credentials to Looker / Looker Studio. Ward reads looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata and starts building baselines. First insight cards land inside 48 hours, before baselines are stable, so you can see the shape of the output early.

  2. 02

    Weeks 2 to 3: calibration

    Baselines stabilize per store and per category. Ward stops flagging normal variance and starts flagging exceptions. This is the window where the false positive rate drops sharply.

  3. 03

    Weeks 4 to 12: operating rhythm

    Daily cards arrive daily and get triaged like any other queue. Most teams find the volume settles into something one person clears in ten minutes. What matters is the action rate, not the alert count.

How Ward connects to Looker / Looker Studio

Ward does not replace Looker. Ward watches the same data Looker visualizes and proactively alerts when something changes. Your dashboards stay. Ward adds intelligence.

Setup: Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.

Data Ward reads from Looker

Looker API for query results
Underlying database (direct)
LookML model metadata

Impact metrics with Looker

Time to Insight
Proactive, no login
Explains why metrics moved before anyone checks a dashboard.
Anomaly Detection
Inter-refresh coverage
Catches deviations between Looker dashboard refresh cycles.
Decision Velocity
Root cause attached
Every anomaly card includes cause analysis; no drill-down needed.
Data Utilization
Unused models activated
LookML dimensions and measures queried beyond built dashboards.

Data lake enrichment

Ward enriches Looker data with: Looker query results, Underlying database, Weather & events, Competitor data, Customer segments

Merchandising wants Ward. You sign the contract.

Pain points
  • ×Business sponsor saw the demo. You have a week to vet a vendor you didn't pick
  • ×AI vendors price by seats and tokens. Total cost is unknowable until invoice three
  • ×Multi-year commits with auto-renew. No exit if the pilot stalls
  • ×Renewals come back 30% higher, with no room to push back and no benchmark to cite
  • ×Security and DPA reviews start after the team has already committed
How Ward helps
  • MSA, DPA, SOC 2 Type II underway, and architecture review available before signature
  • Month-to-month contracts. No multi-year lock-in. No auto-renew traps
  • Transparent pricing set by scope and store count
  • 14-day insight guarantee. If Ward doesn't deliver, month two is on us
  • AI strategy, orchestration and reporting-layer work in enterprise grocery at nine-figure revenue. Reference calls available before signature

Enterprise SaaS spend grew 18% YoY. 53% of subscriptions are underused or duplicative. Source: Gartner

Specialty KPI impact

CLV
Churn risk surfaced
At-risk customers identified before they leave.
Conversion Rate
Assortment + staffing
Cards that help convert high-intent browsers.
Revenue per SKU
Whitespace found
Underperformers identified, gaps in curated assortment.
Overstock
Less capital locked
Demand matching reduces slow-moving inventory.

Frequently asked questions

Ward monitors on-shelf availability across your entire estate and flags stores or categories dropping below threshold. For Specialty retail specifically, Ward monitors 5,000+ SKUs across your boutiques and delivers automated insight cards with root cause analysis and recommended actions.

Ward tracks CLV, Conversion rate, Units per transaction, Repeat purchase rate, Sell-through by tier at the store-category level. Ward tracks expected vs actual on-shelf availability at the store-category level and escalates when fill rate drops below configurable thresholds.

Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses. Data points include: Looker API for query results, Underlying database (direct), LookML model metadata.

Yes. Ward reads Looker data and combines it with contextual signals (weather, events, demographics) to generate Specialty-specific insight cards. No custom development required.

Merchandising wants Ward. You sign the contract. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: MSA, DPA, SOC 2 Type II underway, and architecture review available before signature. Month-to-month contracts. No multi-year lock-in. No auto-renew traps. Transparent pricing set by scope and store count.

Ward delivers daily insight cards covering CLV, Conversion rate, Units per transaction, tailored for Procurement decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.

Ward uses weighted availability scoring (signature items weighted highest, commodity basics lowest), tracks time-of-day availability for high-demand items, and measures the halo effect of signature product availability on overall basket value.

Overall availability looks acceptable, but Ward's weighted metric shows a much lower score. The house-made sourdough, the product customers reference in reviews and social posts, sells out by early afternoon at several locations with higher foot traffic than the production schedule anticipates. Ward recommends adding an afternoon bake at affected stores. Signature product availability recovers, and afternoon revenue climbs as customers who came for the sourdough fill broader baskets.

First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.

No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.

See what Specialty fill rate problems Ward catches.

Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.

Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly

Find out what your data has been hiding.

Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.

Step 1 of 3
What are your goals?
Step 2 of 3
About your operation
Step 3 of 3
Your contact info