Fashion shrinkage, read from Looker / Looker Studio
Fashion retailers on Looker run shrinkage through Ward. 15,000+ SKUs over your locations, monitors around the clock.
The fashion shrinkage stack on Looker / Looker Studio
Here is shrinkage detection in plain terms. Ward identifies abnormal inventory loss patterns and distinguishes between theft, damage, spoilage, and administrative error.
In a Fashion & Apparel store base the job is 15,000+ SKUs over locations. Seasonal sell-through, size curve optimization, and markdown timing. Ward monitors style velocity and flags slow movers before the window closes.
The mechanism. Ward compares expected inventory against actual counts, segments loss by cause category, and flags store-level anomalies against your estate baseline.
The connection itself. Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
What you get
- Cause-level shrinkage attribution
- Store-vs-estate benchmarking
- Receiving dock anomaly detection
- Pattern recognition across time
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled fall denim against last season’s curve at the same selling week. Two causes, both still fixable this week.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
sell_through | Week 6 sell-through 38% vs. 52% plan, concentrated in 3 of 9 door clusters |
size_curve | Waist 30–32 sold out in 41 doors while 36–38 sits at 71% on hand |
markdown.ladder | First markdown is 3 weeks later than LY, weeks-of-supply now 11.4 |
Recommend: transfer 30–32 out of the 12 overstocked doors, hold the ladder on core indigo, and take the first markdown on light wash now while it still clears at 20%.
sell_through_weekly…
Reporting
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.
| Model | Horizon | MAPE |
|---|---|---|
holt_winters | 4wk | 4.1% |
arima_sarimax | 13wk | 8.9% |
gbm_demand | 1wk | 2.1% |
bayes_hier | new store | 11.4% |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
shopify_orders_daily | import | 2m ago |
shopify_returns_reasons | import | 2m ago |
netsuite_inventory_snapshot | import | 14m ago |
cegid_store_sales | import | 1h ago |
retail_size_curve_actuals | import | 1h ago |
retail_markdown_ladder | import | 1h ago |
retail_ga4_website_daily | import | 1h ago |
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
merch-read-default | permit | Model::* |
finance-read-markdown | permit | Model::"markdown_ladder" |
vendor-blocked | forbid | Model::"labor_*" |
ecom-read-returns | permit | Model::"returns_reasons" |
Why Shrinkage matters for Fashion retail
The biggest hidden source of fashion shrinkage isn't theft, it's administrative error in transfer-heavy operations where every handoff between stores, e-commerce, and returns is a reconciliation risk. Ward tracks inventory movements across all channels and distinguishes transfer discrepancies from return fraud and genuine theft.
What Ward has eyes on.
The shrinkage model runs on a daily cycle, not on a reporting calendar. It spots the pattern, attributes what caused it, and attaches a recommended move before the number reaches a review deck.
Every one of your locations gets its own baseline. Ward tracks sell-through rate, markdown %, return rate against it and surfaces only the deviations that hold up. The two that show up most in fashion retail are markdown timing and size curve misallocation, and both are baseline problems before they are P&L problems.
The connection to Looker / Looker Studio is read-only and runs on your schedule. Ward reads straight from looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), and the rest of the feed, then joins it with external context your BI does not carry: weather, local events, competitor pricing.
At the metric level. Ward tracks transfer accuracy rates, return-to-sale ratios, inter-store reconciliation gaps, and high-value item movement patterns. Separating operational shrinkage from intentional loss is essential because the interventions are completely different.
Why this combination
is its own problem.
Shrinkage Detection behaves differently in fashion retail than it does anywhere else. The estate shape, the SKU count, and the speed of the category all change what counts as a real reading and what is noise. Ward is tuned to the fashion version.
- 01 Inter-store transfers get scanned as "received" without case opening, so vendor short-shipments only surface at the next physical inventory.
- 02 BOPIS and ship-from-store create double-counted inventory in the OMS that disappears on the next reconciliation as "shrink".
Benchmarks. Fashion shrink runs 1.4-2.5% of sales, with returns/wardrobing in premium tiers contributing 0.4-0.8% of that. High-value categories (handbags, outerwear, premium denim) account for 40-60% of total dollar shrink despite being 10-20% of unit volume.
What the first 90 days
actually look like.
-
01
Week 1: read-only connection
Ward plugs into Looker / Looker Studio with read-only credentials and begins ingesting looker API for query results and underlying database (direct). No config changes on your side. First findings arrive within 48 hours.
-
02
Weeks 2 to 3: baselines
Ward needs roughly two weeks of history per store to separate a real deviation from normal variance. During this window the cards are directionally right and the thresholds are still moving.
-
03
Weeks 4 to 12: steady state
Ward returns findings each day, each with the driver and what to do about it. Volume settles at a level a single person can read over coffee. The measure of success is not how many daily cards arrive, it is how many get acted on.
How Ward connects to Looker / Looker Studio
Ward does not replace Looker. Ward watches the same data Looker visualizes and proactively alerts when something changes. Your dashboards stay. Ward adds intelligence.
Setup: Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
Data Ward reads from Looker
Impact metrics with Looker
Data lake enrichment
Ward enriches Looker data with: Looker query results, Underlying database, Weather & events, Competitor data, Customer segments
Fashion KPI impact
Frequently asked questions
Ward identifies abnormal inventory loss patterns and distinguishes between theft, damage, spoilage, and administrative error. For Fashion retail specifically, Ward monitors 15,000+ SKUs across your locations and delivers automated insight cards with root cause analysis and recommended actions.
Ward tracks Sell-through rate, Markdown %, Return rate, Style velocity, Size accuracy at the store-category level. Ward compares expected inventory against actual counts, segments loss by cause category, and flags store-level anomalies against your estate baseline.
Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses. Data points include: Looker API for query results, Underlying database (direct), LookML model metadata.
Yes. Ward reads Looker data and combines it with contextual signals (weather, events, demographics) to generate Fashion-specific insight cards. No custom development required.
Ward tracks transfer accuracy rates, return-to-sale ratios, inter-store reconciliation gaps, and high-value item movement patterns. Separating operational shrinkage from intentional loss is essential because the interventions are completely different.
Ward flags a cluster of stores where high-value item returns run well above estate average, most without original tags, with the same payment cards appearing across multiple locations. The pattern matches a wardrobing ring. LP adjusts the return policy for flagged categories and sees a significant drop in high-value returns within weeks.
First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.
No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.
Related solutions
See what Fashion shrinkage problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.