Assortment Planning for Grocery on SAP, built for technology
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward catches grocery assortment movement in your SAP data while it is still fixable, with the cause and what to do about it attached.
The full picture: grocery assortment, SAP data, Technology decisions
Applied to Grocery & Supermarket, the surface area is 30,000+ SKUs throughout stores. Fresh availability, shrinkage, and promo effectiveness across hundreds of stores. Ward monitors perishable turn rates and flags waste before it happens.
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward returns daily cards scoped to technology decision-making.
Assortment Planning is a card type Ward runs continuously. Ward analyzes sell-through by store cluster to recommend which SKUs to add, drop, or reallocate.
How it runs. Ward clusters stores by demographic, traffic, and sales patterns, then measures SKU performance against cluster benchmarks.
Setup: Ward reads from SAP via RFC/BAPI or OData APIs. No changes to your SAP configuration. Read-only access. Data syncs on your schedule.
Key capabilities
- Whitespace opportunity detection
- Planogram optimization inputs
- Store cluster segmentation
- SKU rationalization recommendations
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled Store 37’s last 28 days against the chain baseline. Two root causes, both compounding.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
labor_efficiency | Rev/labor-hour −22% vs. cluster, staffing mismatch at 11a–1p peak |
inventory.fresh | Fresh fill 83%, backroom replenishment lag at 2–4p |
promo.lift | BOGO crackers cannibalized Brand Y by 28%, net category +6% |
Recommend: re-baseline Store 37 schedule against true peak, raise replen window to 1p, and review the BOGO before next cycle.
labor_scheduling…
Reporting
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.
| Model | Horizon | MAPE |
|---|---|---|
holt_winters | 4wk | 4.1% |
arima_sarimax | 13wk | 8.9% |
gbm_demand | 1wk | 2.1% |
bayes_hier | new store | 11.4% |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
sap_pos_transactions | import | 2m ago |
sap_inventory_shrinkage | import | 2m ago |
sap_labor_scheduling | import | 14m ago |
relex_replenishment_plan | import | 1h ago |
blue_yonder_forecast_daily | import | 1h ago |
retail_fresh_waste_daily | import | 1h ago |
retail_promo_calendar | import | 1h ago |
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
merch-read-default | permit | Model::* |
lp-read-shrinkage | permit | Model::"inventory_shrinkage" |
vendor-blocked | forbid | Model::"labor_*" |
fresh-team-west | permit | Model::"fresh_waste_daily" |
Why Assortment matters for Grocery retail
Every assortment addition displaces something else, so the real question is incremental contribution after cannibalization and basket effects. Ward clusters stores by demographics, traffic, and competitive set, then benchmarks SKU performance at the cluster level to produce assortment recommendations that go beyond national planograms.
What Ward has eyes on.
The assortment model runs each day, not on a reporting calendar. It flags the pattern, accounts for the cause, and attaches a recommended action before the number reaches a review deck.
Coverage is store by store, category by category. Ward tracks fill rate, shrinkage %, fresh waste % throughout 30,000+ SKUs and compares each store against its own baseline, not against the chain. That is the difference between knowing the fleet is fine and knowing which seven stores are not.
The connection to SAP Retail is read-only and runs on your schedule. Ward pulls from POS transactions, inventory positions, and the rest of the feed, then joins it with external context your ERP does not carry: weather, local events, competitor pricing.
At the metric level. Ward tracks SKU productivity (revenue per facing), incremental contribution, substitution patterns, and cluster-level demand elasticity, all weighted against supplier fill rates and promotional obligations.
Why this combination
is its own problem.
Assortment Planning needs POS transactions and inventory positions at minimum. SAP Retail carries both, at the grain the model needs. That is the whole integration story: no middleware, no staging warehouse, no custom extract.
- 01 New-item performance gets evaluated against chain averages instead of cluster benchmarks, so winners in one cluster are killed because they fail in another.
- 02 Slot fees from CPG vendors lock in SKUs that don't earn their facing, Ward exposes the cost-of-inclusion versus actual revenue per linear foot.
Benchmarks. A typical grocery store carries 30,000-45,000 SKUs; the bottom 20% generate under 2% of revenue. Cluster-aware assortment usually frees 5-12% of facings without a revenue drop, which translates to space for 1,500-3,000 better-fit SKUs per store cluster.
What the first 90 days
actually look like.
-
01
Week 1: read-only connection
Ward plugs into SAP Retail with read-only credentials and begins ingesting POS transactions and inventory positions. No config changes on your side. First daily cards arrive in two days.
-
02
Weeks 2 to 3: baselines
Ward needs roughly two weeks of history per store to separate a real deviation from normal variance. During this window the cards are directionally right and the thresholds are still moving.
-
03
Weeks 4 to 12: steady state
Ward delivers insight cards each day, each with the cause and what to do about it. Volume settles at a level a single person can read over coffee. The measure of success is not how many cards arrive, it is how many get acted on.
How Ward connects to SAP Retail
Ward connects to SAP Retail (S/4HANA, ECC, CAR) via standard BAPIs and IDocs. Transaction data, inventory positions, and master data flow into Ward without custom development.
Setup: Ward reads from SAP via RFC/BAPI or OData APIs. No changes to your SAP configuration. Read-only access. Data syncs on your schedule.
Data Ward reads from SAP
Impact metrics with SAP
Data lake enrichment
Ward enriches SAP data with: POS transactions, Weather & events, Competitor pricing, Loyalty & CRM, Supplier fill rates
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture.
- ×Business sponsor already chose the vendor. You inherit the security review
- ×Every AI vendor wants write access and a copy of the production data
- ×Model lock-in means rewriting the stack when GPT or Claude moves again
- ×Audit trail is an afterthought. Compliance has nothing to pull on
- ×Data lake project keeps getting bumped for the next thing the business wants
- ✓Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake
- ✓Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent
- ✓LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys
- ✓Every query, every model, every source logged. SIEM-ready audit output
- ✓VPC peering, PrivateLink, SOC 2 II. Your security review is short
74% of enterprise AI projects stall before production. Integration debt and security review are the top two reasons. Source: Gartner
Grocery KPI impact
Frequently asked questions
Ward analyzes sell-through by store cluster to recommend which SKUs to add, drop, or reallocate. For Grocery retail specifically, Ward monitors 30,000+ SKUs across your stores and delivers automated insight cards with root cause analysis and recommended actions.
Ward tracks Fill rate, Shrinkage %, Fresh waste %, Promo lift, Basket size at the store-category level. Ward clusters stores by demographic, traffic, and sales patterns, then measures SKU performance against cluster benchmarks.
Ward reads from SAP via RFC/BAPI or OData APIs. No changes to your SAP configuration. Read-only access. Data syncs on your schedule. Data points include: POS transactions, Inventory positions, Purchase orders, Material master, Vendor master, Promotion calendar.
Yes. Ward reads SAP data and combines it with contextual signals (weather, events, demographics) to generate Grocery-specific insight cards. No custom development required.
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake. Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent. LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys.
Ward delivers daily insight cards covering Fill rate, Shrinkage %, Fresh waste %, tailored for Technology decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.
Ward tracks SKU productivity (revenue per facing), incremental contribution, substitution patterns, and cluster-level demand elasticity, all weighted against supplier fill rates and promotional obligations.
A category manager reviews the natural/organic section across 300 stores. Ward's analysis reveals three distinct clusters: urban health-conscious stores that should carry more SKUs, suburban stores that match the national plan, and rural locations where organic moves at a fraction of the estate average. The one-size-fits-all planogram leaves revenue on the table in urban stores while it ties up slow-moving inventory in rural ones.
First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.
No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.
Related solutions
See what Grocery assortment problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.