A specialty CFO running shrinkage on Looker
Ward ingests looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata from Looker / Looker Studio, tracks shrinkage across 5,000+ specialty SKUs, and sends the finance read on a daily cycle.
Shrinkage Detection for Specialty on Looker, scoped to finance
Shrinkage Detection, in one sentence. Ward identifies abnormal inventory loss patterns and distinguishes between theft, damage, spoilage, and administrative error.
In a Specialty Retail estate the job is 5,000+ SKUs across boutiques. High-consideration purchases, curated assortments, and customer lifetime value. Ward tracks the metrics that matter for margin-rich retail.
Your P&L surprises are born on the store floor. Ward hands you cards scoped to finance decision-making.
How it runs. Ward compares expected inventory against actual counts, segments loss by cause category, and flags store-level anomalies against your estate baseline.
The connection itself. Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
Key capabilities
- Receiving dock anomaly detection
- Pattern recognition across time
- Cause-level shrinkage attribution
- Store-vs-estate benchmarking
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled traffic against conversion by hour for the four flagships. Traffic is fine. The gap is coverage and depth.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
traffic_conversion | Conversion 18.4% vs. 23.1% chain, all of the gap in 12–2p and 5–7p |
labor.coverage | One associate on the floor through both peaks at 3 of 4 doors |
inventory.depth | Top 20 styles at 1.4 units per size, walk-away rate +9% |
Recommend: add floor coverage to both peak windows, deepen the top 20 styles to three per size at the flagships, and route the walk-away list to clienteling.
traffic_conversion…
Reporting
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.
| Model | Horizon | MAPE |
|---|---|---|
holt_winters | 4wk | 4.1% |
arima_sarimax | 13wk | 8.9% |
gbm_demand | 1wk | 2.1% |
bayes_hier | new store | 11.4% |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
shopify_orders_daily | import | 2m ago |
lightspeed_store_sales | import | 2m ago |
netsuite_inventory_snapshot | import | 14m ago |
retail_customer_ltv | import | 1h ago |
retail_traffic_conversion | import | 1h ago |
retail_clienteling_log | import | 1h ago |
retail_ga4_website_daily | import | 1h ago |
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
ops-read-default | permit | Model::* |
crm-read-ltv | permit | Model::"customer_ltv" |
associate-pii-blocked | forbid | Model::"customer_pii" |
merch-read-assortment | permit | Model::"sales_by_tier" |
Why Shrinkage matters for Specialty retail
With manageable SKU counts, specialty retail can track inventory discrepancies at the individual item level, revealing patterns tied to specific shelf positions, staffing configurations, or time windows that aggregate reporting would never surface. Per-unit loss is high enough that each incident matters.
Why this combination
is its own problem.
The finance problem in specialty retail is not missing data. It is that CLV, conversion rate, units per transaction live in different systems on different refresh schedules, and reconciling them is a person-week. Ward does the reconciliation and sends the two-line version.
- 01 Tester-adjacent units in beauty and fragrance categories have 3-7x the standard shrink rate; this isn't modeled in chain-wide shrink expectations.
- 02 High-traffic mall and tourist locations have fundamentally different staffing-to-traffic ratios than standalone stores; loss patterns track to the staffing density rather than the brand or category.
Benchmarks. Specialty retail shrink: 1.0-2.0% standalone, 1.8-3.5% mall and tourist locations. High-value, easily concealable categories (premium fragrance, jewelry, small electronics) drive 40-65% of dollar shrink despite 5-15% of unit volume.
What Ward has eyes on.
Find the leak before it drains you. Ward runs the model continuously rather than on a reporting cycle, which is why a finding lands the morning the pattern starts instead of at the end of the period.
Coverage is store by store, category by category. Ward monitors CLV, conversion rate, units per transaction across 5,000+ SKUs and compares each store against its own baseline, not against the chain. That is the difference between knowing the estate is fine and knowing which seven boutiques are not.
Ward ingests Looker rather than replacing it. Looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata come across on a read-only connection, get enriched with contextual data, and come back as insight cards. Your BI is untouched.
At the metric level. Ward uses item-level tracking feasible at the 5K-SKU scale, maps loss to store layout and traffic flow, and monitors high-value item movement between floor and backroom.
What the first 90 days
actually look like.
-
01
Week 1: read-only connection
Ward sits on top of Looker / Looker Studio with read-only credentials and begins ingesting looker API for query results and underlying database (direct). No config changes on your side. First cards arrive in two days.
-
02
Weeks 2 to 3: baselines
Ward needs roughly two weeks of history per store to separate a real deviation from normal variance. During this window the daily cards are directionally right and the thresholds are still moving.
-
03
Weeks 4 to 12: steady state
Ward hands back daily cards daily, each with root cause and a recommended action. Volume settles at a level a single person can read over coffee. The measure of success is not how many findings arrive, it is how many get acted on.
How Ward connects to Looker / Looker Studio
Ward does not replace Looker. Ward watches the same data Looker visualizes and proactively alerts when something changes. Your dashboards stay. Ward adds intelligence.
Setup: Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
Data Ward reads from Looker
Impact metrics with Looker
Data lake enrichment
Ward enriches Looker data with: Looker query results, Underlying database, Weather & events, Competitor data, Customer segments
Your P&L surprises are born on the store floor.
- ×Margin erosion only surfaces at month-end close
- ×Inventory carrying costs are a black box
- ×Working capital tied up in slow-moving stock nobody is watching
- ×Same-store sales comps lack decomposition into actionable drivers
- ×Capex decisions for store remodels lack unit-economics evidence
- ✓GMROI tracking by category with weekly insight cards
- ✓Inventory carrying cost alerts when capital efficiency drops
- ✓Working capital optimization recommendations based on turnover trends
- ✓SSS decomposition into traffic, conversion, and basket components
- ✓Store-level unit economics cards for capex prioritization
Inventory distortion, overstock and out-of-stock combined, costs retailers $1.77 trillion globally. Source: IHL Group
Specialty KPI impact
Frequently asked questions
Ward identifies abnormal inventory loss patterns and distinguishes between theft, damage, spoilage, and administrative error. For Specialty retail specifically, Ward monitors 5,000+ SKUs across your boutiques and delivers automated insight cards with root cause analysis and recommended actions.
Ward tracks CLV, Conversion rate, Units per transaction, Repeat purchase rate, Sell-through by tier at the store-category level. Ward compares expected inventory against actual counts, segments loss by cause category, and flags store-level anomalies against your estate baseline.
Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses. Data points include: Looker API for query results, Underlying database (direct), LookML model metadata.
Yes. Ward reads Looker data and combines it with contextual signals (weather, events, demographics) to generate Specialty-specific insight cards. No custom development required.
Your P&L surprises are born on the store floor. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: GMROI tracking by category with weekly insight cards. Inventory carrying cost alerts when capital efficiency drops. Working capital optimization recommendations based on turnover trends.
Ward delivers daily insight cards covering CLV, Conversion rate, Units per transaction, tailored for Finance decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.
Ward uses item-level tracking feasible at the 5K-SKU scale, maps loss to store layout and traffic flow, and monitors high-value item movement between floor and backroom.
Ward flags premium fragrance shrinkage running far above average at high-traffic mall locations. The loss concentrates on tester-adjacent units during weekend afternoons when staff-to-customer ratios drop. Ward recommends relocating premium fragrances behind the counter and adding floor coverage during peak windows. Implementation brings shrinkage back toward standalone-store levels.
First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.
No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.
Related solutions
See what Specialty shrinkage problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.