Specialty shrinkage from Looker, briefed to e-commerce
Your online and offline data live in different worlds. Ward catches specialty shrinkage movement in your Looker data before it compounds, with the cause and a recommended action attached.
Shrinkage Detection for Specialty on Looker, scoped to e-commerce
Shrinkage Detection, in one sentence. Ward identifies abnormal inventory loss patterns and distinguishes between theft, damage, spoilage, and administrative error.
A Specialty Retail operator is continuous review 5,000+ SKUs across boutiques. High-consideration purchases, curated assortments, and customer lifetime value. Ward tracks the metrics that matter for margin-rich retail.
Your online and offline data live in different worlds. Ward writes the finding at the altitude a Head of E-Com works at.
What Ward does with that: Ward compares expected inventory against actual counts, segments loss by cause category, and flags store-level anomalies against your estate baseline.
Setup: Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
What it does
- Store-vs-estate benchmarking
- Receiving dock anomaly detection
- Pattern recognition across time
- Cause-level shrinkage attribution
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled traffic against conversion by hour for the four flagships. Traffic is fine. The gap is coverage and depth.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
traffic_conversion | Conversion 18.4% vs. 23.1% chain, all of the gap in 12–2p and 5–7p |
labor.coverage | One associate on the floor through both peaks at 3 of 4 doors |
inventory.depth | Top 20 styles at 1.4 units per size, walk-away rate +9% |
Recommend: add floor coverage to both peak windows, deepen the top 20 styles to three per size at the flagships, and route the walk-away list to clienteling.
traffic_conversion…
Reporting
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.
| Model | Horizon | MAPE |
|---|---|---|
holt_winters | 4wk | 4.1% |
arima_sarimax | 13wk | 8.9% |
gbm_demand | 1wk | 2.1% |
bayes_hier | new store | 11.4% |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
shopify_orders_daily | import | 2m ago |
lightspeed_store_sales | import | 2m ago |
netsuite_inventory_snapshot | import | 14m ago |
retail_customer_ltv | import | 1h ago |
retail_traffic_conversion | import | 1h ago |
retail_clienteling_log | import | 1h ago |
retail_ga4_website_daily | import | 1h ago |
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
ops-read-default | permit | Model::* |
crm-read-ltv | permit | Model::"customer_ltv" |
associate-pii-blocked | forbid | Model::"customer_pii" |
merch-read-assortment | permit | Model::"sales_by_tier" |
Why Shrinkage matters for Specialty retail
With manageable SKU counts, specialty retail can track inventory discrepancies at the individual item level, revealing patterns tied to specific shelf positions, staffing configurations, or time windows that aggregate reporting would never surface. Per-unit loss is high enough that each incident matters.
Why this combination
is its own problem.
Looker / Looker Studio was built for transactions, not for e-commerce decisions. The data is right there and it is in the wrong shape. Ward reads looker API for query results and underlying database (direct) and rewrites them as a decision.
- 01 Specialty per-unit shrink dollar exposure is high enough that loss patterns affecting just 5-15 units per store per quarter still represent meaningful margin loss, but periodic counts can't detect at that frequency.
- 02 High-traffic mall and tourist locations have fundamentally different staffing-to-traffic ratios than standalone stores; loss patterns track to the staffing density rather than the brand or category.
Benchmarks. Specialty retail shrink: 1.0-2.0% standalone, 1.8-3.5% mall and tourist locations. High-value, easily concealable categories (premium fragrance, jewelry, small electronics) drive 40-65% of dollar shrink despite 5-15% of unit volume.
What Ward has eyes on.
Ward tracks 5,000+ SKUs throughout your boutiques, at the store-category level rather than the chain roll-up. The metrics under watch include CLV, conversion rate, units per transaction. A roll-up hides a single-store problem inside a healthy average, which is how assortment curation stays invisible for a quarter.
Ward ingests looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata from Looker / Looker Studio on a read-only connection. Nothing is written back, and your BI configuration does not change. Looker stays the system of record.
Find the leak before it drains you. Ward runs the model continuously rather than on a reporting cycle, which is why a finding lands the morning the pattern starts instead of at the end of the period.
At the metric level. Ward uses item-level tracking feasible at the 5K-SKU scale, maps loss to store layout and traffic flow, and monitors high-value item movement between floor and backroom.
What the first 90 days
actually look like.
-
01
Week 1: connect
Read-only credentials to Looker / Looker Studio. Ward ingests looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata and starts building baselines. First insight cards land inside 48 hours, before baselines are stable, so you can see the shape of the output early.
-
02
Weeks 2 to 3: baselines
Ward needs roughly two weeks of history per store to separate a real deviation from normal variance. During this window the insight cards are directionally right and the thresholds are still moving.
-
03
Weeks 4 to 12: steady state
Ward hands you daily cards each day, each with what caused it and a recommended action. Volume settles at a level a single person can read over coffee. The measure of success is not how many daily cards arrive, it is how many get acted on.
How Ward connects to Looker / Looker Studio
Ward does not replace Looker. Ward watches the same data Looker visualizes and proactively alerts when something changes. Your dashboards stay. Ward adds intelligence.
Setup: Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
Data Ward reads from Looker
Impact metrics with Looker
Data lake enrichment
Ward enriches Looker data with: Looker query results, Underlying database, Weather & events, Competitor data, Customer segments
Your online and offline data live in different worlds.
- ×Nobody can see one inventory position across every channel
- ×Online promo performance is measured separately from in-store
- ×Customer behavior data is siloed by channel
- ×BOPIS/BORIS operational complexity is growing unchecked
- ×Digital marketing attribution stops at the click
- ✓Unified insight cards across online and in-store channels
- ✓Cross-channel promo effectiveness with true attribution
- ✓Customer journey tracking across digital and physical touchpoints
- ✓BOPIS fulfillment performance monitoring with exception cards
- ✓Full-funnel marketing attribution to in-store conversion
Retailers with unified omnichannel data see 30% higher lifetime value per customer. Source: Harvard Business Review
Specialty KPI impact
Frequently asked questions
Ward identifies abnormal inventory loss patterns and distinguishes between theft, damage, spoilage, and administrative error. For Specialty retail specifically, Ward monitors 5,000+ SKUs across your boutiques and delivers automated insight cards with root cause analysis and recommended actions.
Ward tracks CLV, Conversion rate, Units per transaction, Repeat purchase rate, Sell-through by tier at the store-category level. Ward compares expected inventory against actual counts, segments loss by cause category, and flags store-level anomalies against your estate baseline.
Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses. Data points include: Looker API for query results, Underlying database (direct), LookML model metadata.
Yes. Ward reads Looker data and combines it with contextual signals (weather, events, demographics) to generate Specialty-specific insight cards. No custom development required.
Your online and offline data live in different worlds. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Unified insight cards across online and in-store channels. Cross-channel promo effectiveness with true attribution. Customer journey tracking across digital and physical touchpoints.
Ward delivers daily insight cards covering CLV, Conversion rate, Units per transaction, tailored for E-Commerce decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.
Ward uses item-level tracking feasible at the 5K-SKU scale, maps loss to store layout and traffic flow, and monitors high-value item movement between floor and backroom.
Ward flags premium fragrance shrinkage running far above average at high-traffic mall locations. The loss concentrates on tester-adjacent units during weekend afternoons when staff-to-customer ratios drop. Ward recommends relocating premium fragrances behind the counter and adding floor coverage during peak windows. Implementation brings shrinkage back toward standalone-store levels.
First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.
No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.
Related solutions
See what Specialty shrinkage problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.