Fashion assortment from Looker, briefed to store operations
Ward ingests looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata from Looker / Looker Studio, scans continuously assortment throughout 15,000+ fashion SKUs, and hands back the store operations read each day.
How a fashion Director Store Ops runs assortment on Looker / Looker Studio
Managing 800 stores from a spreadsheet is insane. Ward writes the finding at the altitude a Director Store Ops works at.
What assortment planning does: Ward analyzes sell-through by store cluster to recommend which SKUs to add, drop, or reallocate.
Applied to Fashion & Apparel, the surface area is 15,000+ SKUs across locations. Seasonal sell-through, size curve optimization, and markdown timing. Ward monitors style velocity and flags slow movers before the window closes.
What Ward does with that: Ward clusters stores by demographic, traffic, and sales patterns, then measures SKU performance against cluster benchmarks.
Setup: Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
Capabilities
- Planogram optimization inputs
- Store cluster segmentation
- SKU rationalization recommendations
- Whitespace opportunity detection
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled fall denim against last season’s curve at the same selling week. Two causes, both still fixable this week.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
sell_through | Week 6 sell-through 38% vs. 52% plan, concentrated in 3 of 9 door clusters |
size_curve | Waist 30–32 sold out in 41 doors while 36–38 sits at 71% on hand |
markdown.ladder | First markdown is 3 weeks later than LY, weeks-of-supply now 11.4 |
Recommend: transfer 30–32 out of the 12 overstocked doors, hold the ladder on core indigo, and take the first markdown on light wash now while it still clears at 20%.
sell_through_weekly…
Reporting
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.
| Model | Horizon | MAPE |
|---|---|---|
holt_winters | 4wk | 4.1% |
arima_sarimax | 13wk | 8.9% |
gbm_demand | 1wk | 2.1% |
bayes_hier | new store | 11.4% |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
shopify_orders_daily | import | 2m ago |
shopify_returns_reasons | import | 2m ago |
netsuite_inventory_snapshot | import | 14m ago |
cegid_store_sales | import | 1h ago |
retail_size_curve_actuals | import | 1h ago |
retail_markdown_ladder | import | 1h ago |
retail_ga4_website_daily | import | 1h ago |
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
merch-read-default | permit | Model::* |
finance-read-markdown | permit | Model::"markdown_ladder" |
vendor-blocked | forbid | Model::"labor_*" |
ecom-read-returns | permit | Model::"returns_reasons" |
Why Assortment matters for Fashion retail
Ward doesn't replace the buyer's eye, it sharpens the math behind the buy. Which store clusters need wider assortment with shallow depth? Which need narrow-deep buys with full size runs? Ward analyzes sell-through by cluster, customer segment, and style attribute to recommend architecture that matches how customers actually shop each location.
What Ward has eyes on.
Every one of your locations gets its own baseline. Ward scans continuously sell-through rate, markdown %, return rate against it and pulls forward only the deviations that hold up. The two that show up most in fashion retail are markdown timing and size curve misallocation, and both are baseline problems before they are P&L problems.
The connection to Looker / Looker Studio is read-only and runs on your schedule. Ward pulls from looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), and the rest of the feed, then combines it with external context your BI does not carry: weather, local events, competitor pricing.
The assortment model runs every morning, not on a reporting calendar. It spots the pattern, explains what caused it, and attaches a recommended move before the number reaches a review deck.
At the metric level. Ward tracks assortment width vs depth by cluster, style attribute performance, size curve accuracy, and inter-style cannibalization. It measures revenue-per-option to identify when adding more styles dilutes overall performance.
Why this combination
is its own problem.
Most assortment projects stall at data access. This one does not, because Looker already exposes looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata through an API Ward reads directly.
- 01 Top-down option counts get applied uniformly across stores; smaller-volume locations carry too many options and starve depth where it matters.
- 02 Cannibalization between similar styles (two black bodycon dresses) is ignored, so the second option doesn't add what its standalone sell-through suggests.
Benchmarks. Fashion option counts vary 2-4x across store clusters in a healthy assortment plan. Cluster-aware planning typically lifts full-price sell-through 2-5 points and reduces end-of-season markdown depth by 100-300 bps.
What the first 90 days
actually look like.
-
01
Week 1: read-only connection
Ward reads from Looker / Looker Studio with read-only credentials and begins ingesting looker API for query results and underlying database (direct). No config changes on your side. First cards arrive in two days.
-
02
Weeks 2 to 3: baselines
Ward needs roughly two weeks of history per store to separate a real deviation from normal variance. During this window the insight cards are directionally right and the thresholds are still moving.
-
03
Weeks 4 to 12: operating rhythm
Findings arrive on a daily cycle and get triaged like any other queue. Most teams find the volume settles into something one person clears in ten minutes. What matters is the action rate, not the alert count.
How Ward connects to Looker / Looker Studio
Ward does not replace Looker. Ward watches the same data Looker visualizes and proactively alerts when something changes. Your dashboards stay. Ward adds intelligence.
Setup: Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
Data Ward reads from Looker
Impact metrics with Looker
Data lake enrichment
Ward enriches Looker data with: Looker query results, Underlying database, Weather & events, Competitor data, Customer segments
Managing 800 stores from a spreadsheet is insane.
- ×Morning check-ins rely on phone calls and email chains
- ×No single view of which stores need attention today
- ×Labor scheduling is disconnected from demand signals
- ×Planogram compliance is checked manually, quarterly
- ×Exception management is reactive and inconsistent
- ✓Morning brief delivered at 06:47 with prioritized action list
- ✓Estate-wide heat map of store performance, updated hourly
- ✓Staffing recommendations correlated with predicted traffic
- ✓Planogram compliance anomalies detected and flagged
- ✓Consistent exception handling with recommended actions
Poor labor allocation and inconsistent execution cost multi-store retailers 3–5% in lost sales. Source: RSR Research
Fashion KPI impact
Frequently asked questions
Ward analyzes sell-through by store cluster to recommend which SKUs to add, drop, or reallocate. For Fashion retail specifically, Ward monitors 15,000+ SKUs across your locations and delivers automated insight cards with root cause analysis and recommended actions.
Ward tracks Sell-through rate, Markdown %, Return rate, Style velocity, Size accuracy at the store-category level. Ward clusters stores by demographic, traffic, and sales patterns, then measures SKU performance against cluster benchmarks.
Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses. Data points include: Looker API for query results, Underlying database (direct), LookML model metadata.
Yes. Ward reads Looker data and combines it with contextual signals (weather, events, demographics) to generate Fashion-specific insight cards. No custom development required.
Managing 800 stores from a spreadsheet is insane. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Morning brief delivered at 06:47 with prioritized action list. Estate-wide heat map of store performance, updated hourly. Staffing recommendations correlated with predicted traffic.
Ward delivers daily insight cards covering Sell-through rate, Markdown %, Return rate, tailored for Store Operations decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.
Ward tracks assortment width vs depth by cluster, style attribute performance, size curve accuracy, and inter-style cannibalization. It measures revenue-per-option to identify when adding more styles dilutes overall performance.
A denim buyer has 200 styles to allocate across 90 stores. Ward reveals that urban flagships convert best with wide assortment at shallow depth, while suburban stores need fewer core styles with full size runs. The current uniform allocation starves variety in urban stores and creates size gaps in suburban ones. A cluster-specific matrix reduces markdown risk while lifting full-price sell-through.
First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.
No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.
Related solutions
See what Fashion assortment problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.