Fashion · Pricing · Looker · Director Store Ops

A fashion Director Store Ops running pricing on Looker

Ward pulls from looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata from Looker / Looker Studio, scans continuously pricing throughout 15,000+ fashion SKUs, and sends the store operations read each day.

The full picture: fashion pricing, Looker data, Store Operations decisions

Managing 800 stores from a spreadsheet is insane. Ward brings up the inputs that change a store operations decision.

What price optimization does: Ward monitors price elasticity shifts in real time and recommends adjustments that protect margin without sacrificing volume.

Fashion & Apparel changes the scale of the problem: 15,000+ SKUs, every one of your locations. Seasonal sell-through, size curve optimization, and markdown timing. Ward monitors style velocity and flags slow movers before the window closes.

What Ward does with that: Ward continuously measures price elasticity by category, tracks competitive pricing signals, and models the margin-volume tradeoff.

Getting the data in. Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.

Capabilities

  • Competitive price monitoring
  • Margin-volume tradeoff modeling
  • Real-time elasticity measurement
  • Category-level price sensitivity
app.getward.ai Live demo
Acme Apparel @Merchandising: Planning Analyst claude-sonnet default
A

Chat

Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.

Why is fall denim sell-through behind plan?
You · 9:42 AM
Schema Scout · routed to Merchandising Agent

I pulled fall denim against last season’s curve at the same selling week. Two causes, both still fixable this week.

SignalFinding
sell_throughWeek 6 sell-through 38% vs. 52% plan, concentrated in 3 of 9 door clusters
size_curveWaist 30–32 sold out in 41 doors while 36–38 sits at 71% on hand
markdown.ladderFirst markdown is 3 weeks later than LY, weeks-of-supply now 11.4

Recommend: transfer 30–32 out of the 12 overstocked doors, hold the ladder on core indigo, and take the first markdown on light wash now while it still clears at 20%.

9 parallel queries 3 sources cited confidence 0.89
Draft the size-curve transfer list.
You · 9:43 AM
Allocation Agent · drafting transfer list
Querying sell_through_weekly
Ask anything, Ward routes to the right agent. Cmd+K

Reporting

Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.

7d13w52w
Revenue vs. plan
$31.7M
+3.1% WoW
Full-price mix
61.4%
−5.1pp
Sell-through, fall denim
38.2%
wk6, −9pp vs plan
Markdown rate
19.6%
+2.8pp
Revenue vs. plan 13 weeks actual, 6 weeks forecast, 80% interval
Actual Forecast 80% interval
% of plan 106 94 100 forecast → W−13 W−5 today +6wk
Holt-Winters + weather regressor MAPE 4.1% at 4wk Backtested 24 months Crosses plan in 3 weeks
Forecast error by horizon MAPE, 24-month backtest
1wk 2.1%
2wk 3.0%
4wk 4.1%
8wk 6.3%
13wk 8.9%
Accuracy bar for promo decisions: ≤5% at 4wk
Models in production Every forecast ships a model card
ModelHorizonMAPE
holt_winters4wk4.1%
arima_sarimax13wk8.9%
gbm_demand1wk2.1%
bayes_hiernew store11.4%

Sources

Connect external systems to the data lake.

NameTypeLast sync
shopify_orders_dailyimport2m ago
shopify_returns_reasonsimport2m ago
netsuite_inventory_snapshotimport14m ago
cegid_store_salesimport1h ago
retail_size_curve_actualsimport1h ago
retail_markdown_ladderimport1h ago
retail_ga4_website_dailyimport1h ago

Policies

Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.

TLS 1.3 AES-256 Read-only SOC 2 II
Policy IDEffectResources
merch-read-defaultpermitModel::*
finance-read-markdownpermitModel::"markdown_ladder"
vendor-blockedforbidModel::"labor_*"
ecom-read-returnspermitModel::"returns_reasons"
Pricing for Fashion on Looker data, live product demo.

Why Pricing matters for Fashion retail

Fashion pricing is a one-way ratchet: mark down too early and you leave money on the table, too late and you're stuck with deep clearance. Ward monitors style-level sell-through velocity against time remaining in season and recommends optimal markdown depth and timing to maximize total margin dollars across the selling window.

What Ward has eyes on.

The pricing model runs daily, not on a reporting calendar. It detects the pattern, explains the cause, and attaches a recommended move before the number reaches a review deck.

Coverage is store by store, category by category. Ward scans continuously sell-through rate, markdown %, return rate across 15,000+ SKUs and compares each store against its own baseline, not against the chain. That is the difference between knowing the store base is fine and knowing which seven locations are not.

The connection to Looker / Looker Studio is read-only and runs on your schedule. Ward reads straight from looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), and the rest of the feed, then joins it with external context your BI does not carry: weather, local events, competitor pricing.

At the metric level. Ward tracks style-level sell-through vs plan, weeks-of-supply remaining, size fragmentation, competitive markdown timing, and price sensitivity by brand tier. It models the full-season margin curve, not just immediate clearance math.

Signals · POS by style-size-color-store-day, planned vs actual sell-through, current inventory positions, competitor markdown observations, and historical end-of-season clearance curves.

Why this combination
is its own problem.

Most pricing projects stall at data access. This one does not, because Looker already exposes looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata through an API Ward reads directly.

  • 01 Markdown depth gets set to clear remaining units regardless of size mix; if only XS and XXL remain, no markdown depth recovers full sell-through.
  • 02 Competitive markdown calendars are tracked by brand, not by category, so seasonal markdown wars in adjacent categories aren't modeled.

Benchmarks. Fashion ends-season markdown rates: 20-35% basics, 35-55% trend, 50-70% denim, 60-80% outerwear in mild winters. Operators with style-level markdown cadence typically capture 200-500 bps of additional gross margin versus chain-uniform calendars.

What the first 90 days
actually look like.

  1. 01

    Week 1: read-only connection

    Ward sits on top of Looker / Looker Studio with read-only credentials and begins ingesting looker API for query results and underlying database (direct). No config changes on your side. First cards arrive inside the first 48 hours.

  2. 02

    Weeks 2 to 3: baselines

    Ward needs roughly two weeks of history per store to separate a real deviation from normal variance. During this window the findings are directionally right and the thresholds are still moving.

  3. 03

    Weeks 4 to 12: steady state

    Ward hands back insight cards each day, each with what caused it and the next step. Volume settles at a level a single person can read over coffee. The measure of success is not how many daily cards arrive, it is how many get acted on.

How Ward connects to Looker / Looker Studio

Ward does not replace Looker. Ward watches the same data Looker visualizes and proactively alerts when something changes. Your dashboards stay. Ward adds intelligence.

Setup: Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.

Data Ward reads from Looker

Looker API for query results
Underlying database (direct)
LookML model metadata

Impact metrics with Looker

Time to Insight
Proactive, no login
Explains why metrics moved before anyone checks a dashboard.
Anomaly Detection
Inter-refresh coverage
Catches deviations between Looker dashboard refresh cycles.
Decision Velocity
Root cause attached
Every anomaly card includes cause analysis; no drill-down needed.
Data Utilization
Unused models activated
LookML dimensions and measures queried beyond built dashboards.

Data lake enrichment

Ward enriches Looker data with: Looker query results, Underlying database, Weather & events, Competitor data, Customer segments

Managing 800 stores from a spreadsheet is insane.

Pain points
  • ×Morning check-ins rely on phone calls and email chains
  • ×No single view of which stores need attention today
  • ×Labor scheduling is disconnected from demand signals
  • ×Planogram compliance is checked manually, quarterly
  • ×Exception management is reactive and inconsistent
How Ward helps
  • Morning brief delivered at 06:47 with prioritized action list
  • Estate-wide heat map of store performance, updated hourly
  • Staffing recommendations correlated with predicted traffic
  • Planogram compliance anomalies detected and flagged
  • Consistent exception handling with recommended actions

Poor labor allocation and inconsistent execution cost multi-store retailers 3–5% in lost sales. Source: RSR Research

Fashion KPI impact

Markdown Rate
Shallower, earlier
Slow movers detected before deep clearance is the only option.
Sell-Through
More at full price
Style velocity cards flag underperformers early enough to reallocate.
Size Accuracy
Fewer size gaps
Size curves recalibrated by store cluster and season.
Return Rate
Better matching
Right size, right store means fewer returns.

Frequently asked questions

Ward monitors price elasticity shifts in real time and recommends adjustments that protect margin without sacrificing volume. For Fashion retail specifically, Ward monitors 15,000+ SKUs across your locations and delivers automated insight cards with root cause analysis and recommended actions.

Ward tracks Sell-through rate, Markdown %, Return rate, Style velocity, Size accuracy at the store-category level. Ward continuously measures price elasticity by category, tracks competitive pricing signals, and models the margin-volume tradeoff.

Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses. Data points include: Looker API for query results, Underlying database (direct), LookML model metadata.

Yes. Ward reads Looker data and combines it with contextual signals (weather, events, demographics) to generate Fashion-specific insight cards. No custom development required.

Managing 800 stores from a spreadsheet is insane. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Morning brief delivered at 06:47 with prioritized action list. Estate-wide heat map of store performance, updated hourly. Staffing recommendations correlated with predicted traffic.

Ward delivers daily insight cards covering Sell-through rate, Markdown %, Return rate, tailored for Store Operations decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.

Ward tracks style-level sell-through vs plan, weeks-of-supply remaining, size fragmentation, competitive markdown timing, and price sensitivity by brand tier. It models the full-season margin curve, not just immediate clearance math.

Mid-season, Ward identifies dozens of styles selling below plan and segments them by severity: some need immediate deep markdown, others need moderate discounts, and a group should hold price because they're trending toward natural clearance. This tiered approach recovers significant margin versus the standard blanket-markdown playbook.

First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.

No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.

See what Fashion pricing problems Ward catches.

Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.

Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly

Find out what your data has been hiding.

Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.

Step 1 of 3
What are your goals?
Step 2 of 3
About your operation
Step 3 of 3
Your contact info