Stockout Prediction: Fashion retail, Looker data, Store Operations decisions
Managing 800 stores from a spreadsheet is insane. Ward catches fashion stockout movement in your Looker data before it compounds, with root cause and the next step attached.
How a fashion Director Store Ops runs stockout on Looker / Looker Studio
In a Fashion & Apparel estate the job is 15,000+ SKUs throughout locations. Seasonal sell-through, size curve optimization, and markdown timing. Ward monitors style velocity and flags slow movers before the window closes.
Managing 800 stores from a spreadsheet is insane. Ward hands you daily cards scoped to store operations decision-making.
What stockout prediction does: Ward detects SKUs trending toward zero-on-hand and alerts your team with replenishment recommendations before customers notice.
The mechanism. Ward analyzes sell-through velocity, current inventory levels, lead times, and supplier reliability to predict stockouts 24-72 hours before they occur.
Setup: Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
Capabilities
- Supplier-aware lead time modeling
- Priority ranking by revenue impact
- Reduce lost sales by catching gaps early
- Automated replenishment recommendations
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled fall denim against last season’s curve at the same selling week. Two causes, both still fixable this week.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
sell_through | Week 6 sell-through 38% vs. 52% plan, concentrated in 3 of 9 door clusters |
size_curve | Waist 30–32 sold out in 41 doors while 36–38 sits at 71% on hand |
markdown.ladder | First markdown is 3 weeks later than LY, weeks-of-supply now 11.4 |
Recommend: transfer 30–32 out of the 12 overstocked doors, hold the ladder on core indigo, and take the first markdown on light wash now while it still clears at 20%.
sell_through_weekly…
Reporting
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.
| Model | Horizon | MAPE |
|---|---|---|
holt_winters | 4wk | 4.1% |
arima_sarimax | 13wk | 8.9% |
gbm_demand | 1wk | 2.1% |
bayes_hier | new store | 11.4% |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
shopify_orders_daily | import | 2m ago |
shopify_returns_reasons | import | 2m ago |
netsuite_inventory_snapshot | import | 14m ago |
cegid_store_sales | import | 1h ago |
retail_size_curve_actuals | import | 1h ago |
retail_markdown_ladder | import | 1h ago |
retail_ga4_website_daily | import | 1h ago |
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
merch-read-default | permit | Model::* |
finance-read-markdown | permit | Model::"markdown_ladder" |
vendor-blocked | forbid | Model::"labor_*" |
ecom-read-returns | permit | Model::"returns_reasons" |
Why Stockout matters for Fashion retail
Fashion stockouts are invisible, they show up as "size not available," not "product missing," and the POS never records the lost sale. Ward monitors sell-through velocity by style-size-color-store and detects when popular size runs are depleting faster than replenishment can cover within the remaining selling window.
Why this combination
is its own problem.
Looker / Looker Studio was built for transactions, not for store operations decisions. The data is right there and it is in the wrong shape. Ward reads looker API for query results and underlying database (direct) and rewrites them as a decision.
- 01 Pre-season size curves are set from prior-year history and rarely re-run mid-season, locking in a misread on emerging size demand.
- 02 A style at 82% chain sell-through can be 100% out on size M while size XL sits at 40%, chain averages hide the broken assortment that defines a customer's in-store experience.
Benchmarks. Fashion full-price sell-through targets: 60-75% by week 6, 75-85% by week 10. Broken size runs (a key size missing while others remain) typically affect 15-25% of styles in week 4 and 30-40% by week 8 without active rebalancing.
What Ward has eyes on.
Ward tracks 15,000+ SKUs over your locations, at the store-category level rather than the chain roll-up. The metrics under watch include sell-through rate, markdown %, return rate. A roll-up hides a single-store problem inside a healthy average, which is how markdown timing stays invisible for a quarter.
The connection to Looker / Looker Studio is read-only and runs on your schedule. Ward reads straight from looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), and the rest of the feed, then combines it with external context your BI does not carry: weather, local events, competitor pricing.
Know before the shelf empties. Ward runs the model continuously rather than on a reporting cycle, which is why a finding lands the morning the pattern starts instead of at the end of the period.
At the metric level. Requires style-size-color velocity tracking, sell-through benchmarking against plan, inter-store inventory visibility, and time-remaining-in-season context. Ward also flags recurring size curve inaccuracies as a planning problem distinct from replenishment.
What the first 90 days
actually look like.
-
01
Week 1: connect
Read-only credentials to Looker / Looker Studio. Ward reads looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata and starts building baselines. First cards land inside 48 hours, before baselines are stable, so you can see the shape of the output early.
-
02
Weeks 2 to 3: calibration
Baselines stabilize per store and per category. Ward stops flagging normal variance and starts flagging exceptions. This is the window where the false positive rate drops sharply.
-
03
Weeks 4 to 12: steady state
Ward sends daily cards each day, each with the cause and a recommended move. Volume settles at a level a single person can read over coffee. The measure of success is not how many cards arrive, it is how many get acted on.
How Ward connects to Looker / Looker Studio
Ward does not replace Looker. Ward watches the same data Looker visualizes and proactively alerts when something changes. Your dashboards stay. Ward adds intelligence.
Setup: Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
Data Ward reads from Looker
Impact metrics with Looker
Data lake enrichment
Ward enriches Looker data with: Looker query results, Underlying database, Weather & events, Competitor data, Customer segments
Managing 800 stores from a spreadsheet is insane.
- ×Morning check-ins rely on phone calls and email chains
- ×No single view of which stores need attention today
- ×Labor scheduling is disconnected from demand signals
- ×Planogram compliance is checked manually, quarterly
- ×Exception management is reactive and inconsistent
- ✓Morning brief delivered at 06:47 with prioritized action list
- ✓Estate-wide heat map of store performance, updated hourly
- ✓Staffing recommendations correlated with predicted traffic
- ✓Planogram compliance anomalies detected and flagged
- ✓Consistent exception handling with recommended actions
Poor labor allocation and inconsistent execution cost multi-store retailers 3–5% in lost sales. Source: RSR Research
Fashion KPI impact
Frequently asked questions
Ward detects SKUs trending toward zero-on-hand and alerts your team with replenishment recommendations before customers notice. For Fashion retail specifically, Ward monitors 15,000+ SKUs across your locations and delivers automated insight cards with root cause analysis and recommended actions.
Ward tracks Sell-through rate, Markdown %, Return rate, Style velocity, Size accuracy at the store-category level. Ward analyzes sell-through velocity, current inventory levels, lead times, and supplier reliability to predict stockouts 24-72 hours before they occur.
Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses. Data points include: Looker API for query results, Underlying database (direct), LookML model metadata.
Yes. Ward reads Looker data and combines it with contextual signals (weather, events, demographics) to generate Fashion-specific insight cards. No custom development required.
Managing 800 stores from a spreadsheet is insane. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Morning brief delivered at 06:47 with prioritized action list. Estate-wide heat map of store performance, updated hourly. Staffing recommendations correlated with predicted traffic.
Ward delivers daily insight cards covering Sell-through rate, Markdown %, Return rate, tailored for Store Operations decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.
Requires style-size-color velocity tracking, sell-through benchmarking against plan, inter-store inventory visibility, and time-remaining-in-season context. Ward also flags recurring size curve inaccuracies as a planning problem distinct from replenishment.
Ward detects a spring jacket selling far above plan in key sizes at urban stores while sitting in suburban locations. At current velocity, the hot sizes will stock out well before end of season. Ward recommends inter-store transfers from underperforming locations to high-velocity stores, recovering full-price sales that would otherwise become end-of-season markdowns.
First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.
No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.
Related solutions
See what Fashion stockout problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.