Customer Behavior for Fashion on Looker, built for e-commerce
Understand the person behind the basket. Ward runs it on Looker data throughout your fashion footprint, scoped to e-commerce.
Customer Behavior for Fashion on Looker, scoped to e-commerce
What customer behavior does: Ward tracks basket composition shifts, daypart patterns, and customer segment migration.
Applied to Fashion & Apparel, the surface area is 15,000+ SKUs over locations. Seasonal sell-through, size curve optimization, and markdown timing. Ward monitors style velocity and flags slow movers before the window closes.
Your online and offline data live in different worlds. Ward surfaces the readings that change a e-commerce decision.
The mechanism. Ward analyzes transaction-level data to detect shifts in basket composition, shopping frequency, daypart preferences, and segment movement.
Getting the data in. Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
What it does
- Cross-sell opportunity detection
- Basket composition trends
- Daypart behavior modeling
- Customer segment migration
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled fall denim against last season’s curve at the same selling week. Two causes, both still fixable this week.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
sell_through | Week 6 sell-through 38% vs. 52% plan, concentrated in 3 of 9 door clusters |
size_curve | Waist 30–32 sold out in 41 doors while 36–38 sits at 71% on hand |
markdown.ladder | First markdown is 3 weeks later than LY, weeks-of-supply now 11.4 |
Recommend: transfer 30–32 out of the 12 overstocked doors, hold the ladder on core indigo, and take the first markdown on light wash now while it still clears at 20%.
sell_through_weekly…
Reporting
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.
| Model | Horizon | MAPE |
|---|---|---|
holt_winters | 4wk | 4.1% |
arima_sarimax | 13wk | 8.9% |
gbm_demand | 1wk | 2.1% |
bayes_hier | new store | 11.4% |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
shopify_orders_daily | import | 2m ago |
shopify_returns_reasons | import | 2m ago |
netsuite_inventory_snapshot | import | 14m ago |
cegid_store_sales | import | 1h ago |
retail_size_curve_actuals | import | 1h ago |
retail_markdown_ladder | import | 1h ago |
retail_ga4_website_daily | import | 1h ago |
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
merch-read-default | permit | Model::* |
finance-read-markdown | permit | Model::"markdown_ladder" |
vendor-blocked | forbid | Model::"labor_*" |
ecom-read-returns | permit | Model::"returns_reasons" |
Why Customer matters for Fashion retail
Lifecycle moments, new jobs, size changes, trend adoption, create predictable opportunity windows in fashion. When a customer shifts from full-price to sale-only purchasing, that's a churn signal. Ward tracks these behavioral shifts at the cohort level to inform marketing spend, staffing, and inventory positioning.
What Ward has eyes on.
The connection to Looker / Looker Studio is read-only and runs on your schedule. Ward reads straight from looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), and the rest of the feed, then combines it with external context your BI does not carry: weather, local events, competitor pricing.
The customer model runs each day, not on a reporting calendar. It spots the pattern, explains what caused it, and attaches a recommended action before the number reaches a review deck.
Coverage is store by store, category by category. Ward keeps a running read on sell-through rate, markdown %, return rate over 15,000+ SKUs and compares each store against its own baseline, not against the chain. That is the difference between knowing the estate is fine and knowing which seven locations are not.
At the metric level. Ward tracks purchase frequency cadence, full-price vs markdown mix, category migration, size consistency, and cohort-level churn probability, each benchmarked against seasonal norms and customer lifecycle stage.
Why this combination
is its own problem.
Running Ward on Looker in a fashion estate skips the usual first step. There is no ingestion project, because Looker / Looker Studio already holds looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata. Ward ingests what is there.
- 01 RFM scoring lumps customers by recency-frequency-monetary without separating the high-LTV full-price loyalist from the discount hunter who only buys clearance.
- 02 Size changes get treated as data quality errors when they're often life-stage signals (pregnancy, fitness change) that predict 2-3x category migration.
Benchmarks. Fashion top-decile customers drive 35-55% of revenue at 5-10x the LTV of median. A 90-day full-price-to-markdown ratio shift greater than 30% in a cohort typically precedes a 6-month churn lift of 20-40%.
What the first 90 days
actually look like.
-
01
Week 1: read-only connection
Ward reads from Looker / Looker Studio with read-only credentials and begins ingesting looker API for query results and underlying database (direct). No config changes on your side. First cards arrive within 48 hours.
-
02
Weeks 2 to 3: calibration
Baselines stabilize per store and per category. Ward stops flagging normal variance and starts flagging exceptions. This is the window where the false positive rate drops sharply.
-
03
Weeks 4 to 12: steady state
Ward hands back insight cards on a daily cycle, each with the cause and a recommended action. Volume settles at a level a single person can read over coffee. The measure of success is not how many insight cards arrive, it is how many get acted on.
How Ward connects to Looker / Looker Studio
Ward does not replace Looker. Ward watches the same data Looker visualizes and proactively alerts when something changes. Your dashboards stay. Ward adds intelligence.
Setup: Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
Data Ward reads from Looker
Impact metrics with Looker
Data lake enrichment
Ward enriches Looker data with: Looker query results, Underlying database, Weather & events, Competitor data, Customer segments
Your online and offline data live in different worlds.
- ×Nobody can see one inventory position across every channel
- ×Online promo performance is measured separately from in-store
- ×Customer behavior data is siloed by channel
- ×BOPIS/BORIS operational complexity is growing unchecked
- ×Digital marketing attribution stops at the click
- ✓Unified insight cards across online and in-store channels
- ✓Cross-channel promo effectiveness with true attribution
- ✓Customer journey tracking across digital and physical touchpoints
- ✓BOPIS fulfillment performance monitoring with exception cards
- ✓Full-funnel marketing attribution to in-store conversion
Retailers with unified omnichannel data see 30% higher lifetime value per customer. Source: Harvard Business Review
Fashion KPI impact
Frequently asked questions
Ward tracks basket composition shifts, daypart patterns, and customer segment migration. For Fashion retail specifically, Ward monitors 15,000+ SKUs across your locations and delivers automated insight cards with root cause analysis and recommended actions.
Ward tracks Sell-through rate, Markdown %, Return rate, Style velocity, Size accuracy at the store-category level. Ward analyzes transaction-level data to detect shifts in basket composition, shopping frequency, daypart preferences, and segment movement.
Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses. Data points include: Looker API for query results, Underlying database (direct), LookML model metadata.
Yes. Ward reads Looker data and combines it with contextual signals (weather, events, demographics) to generate Fashion-specific insight cards. No custom development required.
Your online and offline data live in different worlds. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Unified insight cards across online and in-store channels. Cross-channel promo effectiveness with true attribution. Customer journey tracking across digital and physical touchpoints.
Ward delivers daily insight cards covering Sell-through rate, Markdown %, Return rate, tailored for E-Commerce decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.
Ward tracks purchase frequency cadence, full-price vs markdown mix, category migration, size consistency, and cohort-level churn probability, each benchmarked against seasonal norms and customer lifecycle stage.
Ward detects meaningful migration from full-price to sale-only purchasing in a high-value customer segment. It correlates the shift with competitor store openings, recent price increases on workwear basics, and declining quality mentions in online reviews. The merchandising team uses the insight to reformulate a core product and adjust pricing on the most price-sensitive items.
First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.
No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.
Related solutions
See what Fashion customer problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.