Fashion customer from Looker, briefed to technology
Understand the person behind the basket. Ward runs it on Looker data over your fashion store base, scoped to technology.
The full picture: fashion customer, Looker data, Technology decisions
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward filters to what a Head of IT can act on and drops the rest.
Customer Behavior is a card type Ward runs continuously. Ward tracks basket composition shifts, daypart patterns, and customer segment migration.
Applied to Fashion & Apparel, the surface area is 15,000+ SKUs throughout locations. Seasonal sell-through, size curve optimization, and markdown timing. Ward monitors style velocity and flags slow movers before the window closes.
How Ward hands back Customer cards: Ward analyzes transaction-level data to detect shifts in basket composition, shopping frequency, daypart preferences, and segment movement.
Setup: Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
What you get
- Basket composition trends
- Daypart behavior modeling
- Customer segment migration
- Cross-sell opportunity detection
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled fall denim against last season’s curve at the same selling week. Two causes, both still fixable this week.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
sell_through | Week 6 sell-through 38% vs. 52% plan, concentrated in 3 of 9 door clusters |
size_curve | Waist 30–32 sold out in 41 doors while 36–38 sits at 71% on hand |
markdown.ladder | First markdown is 3 weeks later than LY, weeks-of-supply now 11.4 |
Recommend: transfer 30–32 out of the 12 overstocked doors, hold the ladder on core indigo, and take the first markdown on light wash now while it still clears at 20%.
sell_through_weekly…
Reporting
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.
| Model | Horizon | MAPE |
|---|---|---|
holt_winters | 4wk | 4.1% |
arima_sarimax | 13wk | 8.9% |
gbm_demand | 1wk | 2.1% |
bayes_hier | new store | 11.4% |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
shopify_orders_daily | import | 2m ago |
shopify_returns_reasons | import | 2m ago |
netsuite_inventory_snapshot | import | 14m ago |
cegid_store_sales | import | 1h ago |
retail_size_curve_actuals | import | 1h ago |
retail_markdown_ladder | import | 1h ago |
retail_ga4_website_daily | import | 1h ago |
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
merch-read-default | permit | Model::* |
finance-read-markdown | permit | Model::"markdown_ladder" |
vendor-blocked | forbid | Model::"labor_*" |
ecom-read-returns | permit | Model::"returns_reasons" |
Why Customer matters for Fashion retail
Lifecycle moments, new jobs, size changes, trend adoption, create predictable opportunity windows in fashion. When a customer shifts from full-price to sale-only purchasing, that's a churn signal. Ward tracks these behavioral shifts at the cohort level to inform marketing spend, staffing, and inventory positioning.
What Ward has eyes on.
Understand the person behind the basket. Ward runs the model continuously rather than on a reporting cycle, which is why a finding lands the morning the pattern starts instead of at the end of the period.
Every one of your locations gets its own baseline. Ward watches sell-through rate, markdown %, return rate against it and raises only the deviations that hold up. The two that show up most in fashion retail are markdown timing and size curve misallocation, and both are baseline problems before they are P&L problems.
Ward ingests Looker rather than replacing it. Looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata come across on a read-only connection, get enriched with contextual data, and come back as insight cards. Your BI is untouched.
At the metric level. Ward tracks purchase frequency cadence, full-price vs markdown mix, category migration, size consistency, and cohort-level churn probability, each benchmarked against seasonal norms and customer lifecycle stage.
Why this combination
is its own problem.
Most customer projects stall at data access. This one does not, because Looker already exposes looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata through an API Ward reads directly.
- 01 RFM scoring lumps customers by recency-frequency-monetary without separating the high-LTV full-price loyalist from the discount hunter who only buys clearance.
- 02 Lapsed-customer reactivation campaigns target everyone past a threshold; without the lapse-cause segmentation, win-back ROI is flat across cohorts.
Benchmarks. Fashion top-decile customers drive 35-55% of revenue at 5-10x the LTV of median. A 90-day full-price-to-markdown ratio shift greater than 30% in a cohort typically precedes a 6-month churn lift of 20-40%.
What the first 90 days
actually look like.
-
01
Week 1: read-only connection
Ward reads from Looker / Looker Studio with read-only credentials and begins ingesting looker API for query results and underlying database (direct). No config changes on your side. First findings arrive inside the first 48 hours.
-
02
Weeks 2 to 3: baselines
Ward needs roughly two weeks of history per store to separate a real deviation from normal variance. During this window the findings are directionally right and the thresholds are still moving.
-
03
Weeks 4 to 12: operating rhythm
Daily cards arrive every morning and get triaged like any other queue. Most teams find the volume settles into something one person clears in ten minutes. What matters is the action rate, not the alert count.
How Ward connects to Looker / Looker Studio
Ward does not replace Looker. Ward watches the same data Looker visualizes and proactively alerts when something changes. Your dashboards stay. Ward adds intelligence.
Setup: Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
Data Ward reads from Looker
Impact metrics with Looker
Data lake enrichment
Ward enriches Looker data with: Looker query results, Underlying database, Weather & events, Competitor data, Customer segments
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture.
- ×Business sponsor already chose the vendor. You inherit the security review
- ×Every AI vendor wants write access and a copy of the production data
- ×Model lock-in means rewriting the stack when GPT or Claude moves again
- ×Audit trail is an afterthought. Compliance has nothing to pull on
- ×Data lake project keeps getting bumped for the next thing the business wants
- ✓Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake
- ✓Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent
- ✓LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys
- ✓Every query, every model, every source logged. SIEM-ready audit output
- ✓VPC peering, PrivateLink, SOC 2 II. Your security review is short
74% of enterprise AI projects stall before production. Integration debt and security review are the top two reasons. Source: Gartner
Fashion KPI impact
Frequently asked questions
Ward tracks basket composition shifts, daypart patterns, and customer segment migration. For Fashion retail specifically, Ward monitors 15,000+ SKUs across your locations and delivers automated insight cards with root cause analysis and recommended actions.
Ward tracks Sell-through rate, Markdown %, Return rate, Style velocity, Size accuracy at the store-category level. Ward analyzes transaction-level data to detect shifts in basket composition, shopping frequency, daypart preferences, and segment movement.
Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses. Data points include: Looker API for query results, Underlying database (direct), LookML model metadata.
Yes. Ward reads Looker data and combines it with contextual signals (weather, events, demographics) to generate Fashion-specific insight cards. No custom development required.
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake. Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent. LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys.
Ward delivers daily insight cards covering Sell-through rate, Markdown %, Return rate, tailored for Technology decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.
Ward tracks purchase frequency cadence, full-price vs markdown mix, category migration, size consistency, and cohort-level churn probability, each benchmarked against seasonal norms and customer lifecycle stage.
Ward detects meaningful migration from full-price to sale-only purchasing in a high-value customer segment. It correlates the shift with competitor store openings, recent price increases on workwear basics, and declining quality mentions in online reviews. The merchandising team uses the insight to reformulate a core product and adjust pricing on the most price-sensitive items.
First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.
No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.
Related solutions
See what Fashion customer problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.