Price Optimization for Fashion on Looker, built for technology
Price on elasticity you can measure. Ward runs it on Looker data throughout your fashion store base, scoped to technology.
Price Optimization for Fashion on Looker, scoped to technology
For Fashion & Apparel retailers, that means tracking 15,000+ SKUs across locations. Seasonal sell-through, size curve optimization, and markdown timing. Ward monitors style velocity and flags slow movers before the window closes.
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward brings up the inputs that change a technology decision.
Price Optimization, in one sentence. Ward monitors price elasticity shifts in real time and recommends adjustments that protect margin without sacrificing volume.
How it runs. Ward continuously measures price elasticity by category, tracks competitive pricing signals, and models the margin-volume tradeoff.
Setup: Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
Key capabilities
- Category-level price sensitivity
- Competitive price monitoring
- Margin-volume tradeoff modeling
- Real-time elasticity measurement
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled fall denim against last season’s curve at the same selling week. Two causes, both still fixable this week.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
sell_through | Week 6 sell-through 38% vs. 52% plan, concentrated in 3 of 9 door clusters |
size_curve | Waist 30–32 sold out in 41 doors while 36–38 sits at 71% on hand |
markdown.ladder | First markdown is 3 weeks later than LY, weeks-of-supply now 11.4 |
Recommend: transfer 30–32 out of the 12 overstocked doors, hold the ladder on core indigo, and take the first markdown on light wash now while it still clears at 20%.
sell_through_weekly…
Reporting
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.
| Model | Horizon | MAPE |
|---|---|---|
holt_winters | 4wk | 4.1% |
arima_sarimax | 13wk | 8.9% |
gbm_demand | 1wk | 2.1% |
bayes_hier | new store | 11.4% |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
shopify_orders_daily | import | 2m ago |
shopify_returns_reasons | import | 2m ago |
netsuite_inventory_snapshot | import | 14m ago |
cegid_store_sales | import | 1h ago |
retail_size_curve_actuals | import | 1h ago |
retail_markdown_ladder | import | 1h ago |
retail_ga4_website_daily | import | 1h ago |
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
merch-read-default | permit | Model::* |
finance-read-markdown | permit | Model::"markdown_ladder" |
vendor-blocked | forbid | Model::"labor_*" |
ecom-read-returns | permit | Model::"returns_reasons" |
Why Pricing matters for Fashion retail
Fashion pricing is a one-way ratchet: mark down too early and you leave money on the table, too late and you're stuck with deep clearance. Ward monitors style-level sell-through velocity against time remaining in season and recommends optimal markdown depth and timing to maximize total margin dollars across the selling window.
What Ward has eyes on.
The pricing model runs on a daily cycle, not on a reporting calendar. It detects the pattern, traces the cause, and attaches the next step before the number reaches a review deck.
Every one of your locations gets its own baseline. Ward tracks sell-through rate, markdown %, return rate against it and surfaces only the deviations that hold up. The two that show up most in fashion retail are markdown timing and size curve misallocation, and both are baseline problems before they are P&L problems.
Ward pulls from looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata from Looker / Looker Studio on a read-only connection. Nothing is written back, and your BI configuration does not change. Looker stays the system of record.
At the metric level. Ward tracks style-level sell-through vs plan, weeks-of-supply remaining, size fragmentation, competitive markdown timing, and price sensitivity by brand tier. It models the full-season margin curve, not just immediate clearance math.
Why this combination
is its own problem.
Looker / Looker Studio was built for transactions, not for technology decisions. The data is right there and it is in the wrong shape. Ward reads straight from looker API for query results and underlying database (direct) and rewrites them as a decision.
- 01 Competitive markdown calendars are tracked by brand, not by category, so seasonal markdown wars in adjacent categories aren't modeled.
- 02 Calendar-driven markdowns (week 8: 25% off, week 12: 50% off) ignore that hot styles still sell at full price and slow ones need a 40% cut earlier.
Benchmarks. Fashion ends-season markdown rates: 20-35% basics, 35-55% trend, 50-70% denim, 60-80% outerwear in mild winters. Operators with style-level markdown cadence typically capture 200-500 bps of additional gross margin versus chain-uniform calendars.
What the first 90 days
actually look like.
-
01
Week 1: connect
Read-only credentials to Looker / Looker Studio. Ward pulls from looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata and starts building baselines. First daily cards land inside 48 hours, before baselines are stable, so you can see the shape of the output early.
-
02
Weeks 2 to 3: baselines
Ward needs roughly two weeks of history per store to separate a real deviation from normal variance. During this window the cards are directionally right and the thresholds are still moving.
-
03
Weeks 4 to 12: steady state
Ward returns cards every morning, each with the cause and the next step. Volume settles at a level a single person can read over coffee. The measure of success is not how many insight cards arrive, it is how many get acted on.
How Ward connects to Looker / Looker Studio
Ward does not replace Looker. Ward watches the same data Looker visualizes and proactively alerts when something changes. Your dashboards stay. Ward adds intelligence.
Setup: Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
Data Ward reads from Looker
Impact metrics with Looker
Data lake enrichment
Ward enriches Looker data with: Looker query results, Underlying database, Weather & events, Competitor data, Customer segments
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture.
- ×Business sponsor already chose the vendor. You inherit the security review
- ×Every AI vendor wants write access and a copy of the production data
- ×Model lock-in means rewriting the stack when GPT or Claude moves again
- ×Audit trail is an afterthought. Compliance has nothing to pull on
- ×Data lake project keeps getting bumped for the next thing the business wants
- ✓Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake
- ✓Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent
- ✓LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys
- ✓Every query, every model, every source logged. SIEM-ready audit output
- ✓VPC peering, PrivateLink, SOC 2 II. Your security review is short
74% of enterprise AI projects stall before production. Integration debt and security review are the top two reasons. Source: Gartner
Fashion KPI impact
Frequently asked questions
Ward monitors price elasticity shifts in real time and recommends adjustments that protect margin without sacrificing volume. For Fashion retail specifically, Ward monitors 15,000+ SKUs across your locations and delivers automated insight cards with root cause analysis and recommended actions.
Ward tracks Sell-through rate, Markdown %, Return rate, Style velocity, Size accuracy at the store-category level. Ward continuously measures price elasticity by category, tracks competitive pricing signals, and models the margin-volume tradeoff.
Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses. Data points include: Looker API for query results, Underlying database (direct), LookML model metadata.
Yes. Ward reads Looker data and combines it with contextual signals (weather, events, demographics) to generate Fashion-specific insight cards. No custom development required.
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake. Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent. LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys.
Ward delivers daily insight cards covering Sell-through rate, Markdown %, Return rate, tailored for Technology decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.
Ward tracks style-level sell-through vs plan, weeks-of-supply remaining, size fragmentation, competitive markdown timing, and price sensitivity by brand tier. It models the full-season margin curve, not just immediate clearance math.
Mid-season, Ward identifies dozens of styles selling below plan and segments them by severity: some need immediate deep markdown, others need moderate discounts, and a group should hold price because they're trending toward natural clearance. This tiered approach recovers significant margin versus the standard blanket-markdown playbook.
First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.
No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.
Related solutions
See what Fashion pricing problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.