A fashion Head of IT running promos on Looker
Know which promos actually work. Ward runs it on Looker data across your fashion store base, scoped to technology.
Promo Effectiveness for Fashion on Looker, scoped to technology
In a Fashion & Apparel store base the job is 15,000+ SKUs over locations. Seasonal sell-through, size curve optimization, and markdown timing. Ward monitors style velocity and flags slow movers before the window closes.
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward hands you findings scoped to technology decision-making.
Promo Effectiveness, in one sentence. Ward measures true promotional lift net of cannibalization, pull-forward, and pantry loading.
Under the hood. Ward isolates incremental volume from baseline, measures cross-SKU cannibalization, estimates pull-forward effects, and calculates true ROI.
Setup: Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
Capabilities
- Cannibalization quantification
- Pull-forward detection
- Promo ROI scorecards
- Net lift measurement (not gross)
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled fall denim against last season’s curve at the same selling week. Two causes, both still fixable this week.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
sell_through | Week 6 sell-through 38% vs. 52% plan, concentrated in 3 of 9 door clusters |
size_curve | Waist 30–32 sold out in 41 doors while 36–38 sits at 71% on hand |
markdown.ladder | First markdown is 3 weeks later than LY, weeks-of-supply now 11.4 |
Recommend: transfer 30–32 out of the 12 overstocked doors, hold the ladder on core indigo, and take the first markdown on light wash now while it still clears at 20%.
sell_through_weekly…
Reporting
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.
| Model | Horizon | MAPE |
|---|---|---|
holt_winters | 4wk | 4.1% |
arima_sarimax | 13wk | 8.9% |
gbm_demand | 1wk | 2.1% |
bayes_hier | new store | 11.4% |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
shopify_orders_daily | import | 2m ago |
shopify_returns_reasons | import | 2m ago |
netsuite_inventory_snapshot | import | 14m ago |
cegid_store_sales | import | 1h ago |
retail_size_curve_actuals | import | 1h ago |
retail_markdown_ladder | import | 1h ago |
retail_ga4_website_daily | import | 1h ago |
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
merch-read-default | permit | Model::* |
finance-read-markdown | permit | Model::"markdown_ladder" |
vendor-blocked | forbid | Model::"labor_*" |
ecom-read-returns | permit | Model::"returns_reasons" |
Why Promos matters for Fashion retail
Blanket promotions drive traffic but train customers to wait for sales. Ward measures the full cycle, demand suppression before the event, lift during, and pull-forward decline after, to reveal which promotions build revenue and which merely shift it around the calendar.
Why this combination
is its own problem.
Running Ward on Looker in a fashion footprint skips the usual first step. There is no ingestion project, because Looker / Looker Studio already holds looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata. Ward reads straight from what is there.
- 01 Customer-level promo dependency is invisible at the cohort level; the top 20% of "loyalists" can be 80% promo-dependent without the chain noticing.
- 02 Margin-per-unit erosion compounds when stack-on offers (employee discount + cart promo + free shipping) trigger together, typical promo P&L doesn't track stacked effective discount.
Benchmarks. Fashion promo events show 40-100% gross weekend lift but typically 5-25% net incrementality after pre-event suppression and pull-forward. Operators that convert blanket events to targeted-acquisition offers usually recover 200-600 bps of gross margin.
What Ward has eyes on.
Know which promos actually work. Ward runs the model continuously rather than on a reporting cycle, which is why a finding lands the morning the pattern starts instead of at the end of the period.
Ward monitors 15,000+ SKUs throughout your locations, at the store-category level rather than the chain roll-up. The metrics under watch include sell-through rate, markdown %, return rate. A roll-up hides a single-store problem inside a healthy average, which is how markdown timing stays invisible for a quarter.
Ward ingests looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata from Looker / Looker Studio on a read-only connection. Nothing is written back, and your BI configuration does not change. Looker stays the system of record.
At the metric level. Ward measures the full promo cycle: pre-event suppression, event lift, post-event decline, new vs returning customer mix, and margin-per-unit impact. It also calculates customer-level promo dependency scores to flag at-risk segments.
What the first 90 days
actually look like.
-
01
Week 1: connect
Read-only credentials to Looker / Looker Studio. Ward reads looker API for query results, underlying database (direct), lookML model metadata and starts building baselines. First cards land inside 48 hours, before baselines are stable, so you can see the shape of the output early.
-
02
Weeks 2 to 3: calibration
Baselines stabilize per store and per category. Ward stops flagging normal variance and starts flagging exceptions. This is the window where the false positive rate drops sharply.
-
03
Weeks 4 to 12: operating rhythm
Daily cards arrive every morning and get triaged like any other queue. Most teams find the volume settles into something one person clears in ten minutes. What matters is the action rate, not the alert count.
How Ward connects to Looker / Looker Studio
Ward does not replace Looker. Ward watches the same data Looker visualizes and proactively alerts when something changes. Your dashboards stay. Ward adds intelligence.
Setup: Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses.
Data Ward reads from Looker
Impact metrics with Looker
Data lake enrichment
Ward enriches Looker data with: Looker query results, Underlying database, Weather & events, Competitor data, Customer segments
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture.
- ×Business sponsor already chose the vendor. You inherit the security review
- ×Every AI vendor wants write access and a copy of the production data
- ×Model lock-in means rewriting the stack when GPT or Claude moves again
- ×Audit trail is an afterthought. Compliance has nothing to pull on
- ×Data lake project keeps getting bumped for the next thing the business wants
- ✓Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake
- ✓Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent
- ✓LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys
- ✓Every query, every model, every source logged. SIEM-ready audit output
- ✓VPC peering, PrivateLink, SOC 2 II. Your security review is short
74% of enterprise AI projects stall before production. Integration debt and security review are the top two reasons. Source: Gartner
Fashion KPI impact
Frequently asked questions
Ward measures true promotional lift net of cannibalization, pull-forward, and pantry loading. For Fashion retail specifically, Ward monitors 15,000+ SKUs across your locations and delivers automated insight cards with root cause analysis and recommended actions.
Ward tracks Sell-through rate, Markdown %, Return rate, Style velocity, Size accuracy at the store-category level. Ward isolates incremental volume from baseline, measures cross-SKU cannibalization, estimates pull-forward effects, and calculates true ROI.
Ward can query Looker via API or connect directly to the underlying database. Either way, Ward monitors while your team browses. Data points include: Looker API for query results, Underlying database (direct), LookML model metadata.
Yes. Ward reads Looker data and combines it with contextual signals (weather, events, demographics) to generate Fashion-specific insight cards. No custom development required.
The business wants AI. You sign off on the architecture. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Federated query: data stays in your warehouse. No copies, no shadow lake. Read-only credentials. Cedar policies enforce least-privilege per agent. LLM-agnostic. Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Ollama. Bring your own keys.
Ward delivers daily insight cards covering Sell-through rate, Markdown %, Return rate, tailored for Technology decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.
Ward measures the full promo cycle: pre-event suppression, event lift, post-event decline, new vs returning customer mix, and margin-per-unit impact. It also calculates customer-level promo dependency scores to flag at-risk segments.
Marketing declares the annual Friends & Family event a win based on weekend revenue lift. Ward's full-cycle analysis shows substantial pre-event demand suppression and post-event pull-forward decline that cut net incrementality roughly in half. New customer acquisition during the event ran well below non-promo weekends. Ward recommends replacing the blanket discount with targeted acquisition offers that actually grow the customer base.
First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.
No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.
Related solutions
See what Fashion promos problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.