Assortment Planning: Grocery retail, Snowflake data, Loss Prevention decisions
Ward reads straight from any table or view in your Snowflake account, cross-database joins, historical data at any depth from Snowflake, tracks assortment across 30,000+ grocery SKUs, and delivers the loss prevention read every morning.
The full picture: grocery assortment, Snowflake data, Loss Prevention decisions
Grocery & Supermarket changes the scale of the problem: 30,000+ SKUs, every one of your stores. Fresh availability, shrinkage, and promo effectiveness across hundreds of stores. Ward monitors perishable turn rates and flags waste before it happens.
Shrinkage costs you more than you think. Ward finds out where. Ward writes the finding at the altitude a Head of LP works at.
Assortment Planning is a finding type Ward runs continuously. Ward analyzes sell-through by store cluster to recommend which SKUs to add, drop, or reallocate.
How it runs. Ward clusters stores by demographic, traffic, and sales patterns, then measures SKU performance against cluster benchmarks.
Getting the data in. Ward connects via Snowflake SQL API with key-pair authentication. Read-only warehouse. Your data never leaves Snowflake.
Key capabilities
- Planogram optimization inputs
- Store cluster segmentation
- SKU rationalization recommendations
- Whitespace opportunity detection
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled Store 37’s last 28 days against the chain baseline. Two root causes, both compounding.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
labor_efficiency | Rev/labor-hour −22% vs. cluster, staffing mismatch at 11a–1p peak |
inventory.fresh | Fresh fill 83%, backroom replenishment lag at 2–4p |
promo.lift | BOGO crackers cannibalized Brand Y by 28%, net category +6% |
Recommend: re-baseline Store 37 schedule against true peak, raise replen window to 1p, and review the BOGO before next cycle.
labor_scheduling…
Reporting
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.
| Model | Horizon | MAPE |
|---|---|---|
holt_winters | 4wk | 4.1% |
arima_sarimax | 13wk | 8.9% |
gbm_demand | 1wk | 2.1% |
bayes_hier | new store | 11.4% |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
sap_pos_transactions | import | 2m ago |
sap_inventory_shrinkage | import | 2m ago |
sap_labor_scheduling | import | 14m ago |
relex_replenishment_plan | import | 1h ago |
blue_yonder_forecast_daily | import | 1h ago |
retail_fresh_waste_daily | import | 1h ago |
retail_promo_calendar | import | 1h ago |
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
merch-read-default | permit | Model::* |
lp-read-shrinkage | permit | Model::"inventory_shrinkage" |
vendor-blocked | forbid | Model::"labor_*" |
fresh-team-west | permit | Model::"fresh_waste_daily" |
Why Assortment matters for Grocery retail
Every assortment addition displaces something else, so the real question is incremental contribution after cannibalization and basket effects. Ward clusters stores by demographics, traffic, and competitive set, then benchmarks SKU performance at the cluster level to produce assortment recommendations that go beyond national planograms.
Why this combination
is its own problem.
A generic assortment model applied to a grocery estate produces alerts nobody trusts. The thresholds are wrong, because grocery baselines are wrong for it. Ward learns the baseline from your own stores instead of importing one.
- 01 Cluster definitions based on store size or banner miss the demographic signal; two same-size stores can have completely different shopper profiles.
- 02 Slot fees from CPG vendors lock in SKUs that don't earn their facing, Ward exposes the cost-of-inclusion versus actual revenue per linear foot.
Benchmarks. A typical grocery store carries 30,000-45,000 SKUs; the bottom 20% generate under 2% of revenue. Cluster-aware assortment usually frees 5-12% of facings without a revenue drop, which translates to space for 1,500-3,000 better-fit SKUs per store cluster.
What Ward has eyes on.
Ward reads straight from Snowflake rather than replacing it. Any table or view in your Snowflake account, cross-database joins, historical data at any depth come across on a read-only connection, get enriched with contextual data, and come back as cards. Your Data Platform is untouched.
Stock what sells. Cut what doesn't. Ward runs the model continuously rather than on a reporting cycle, which is why a finding lands the morning the pattern starts instead of at the end of the period.
Coverage is store by store, category by category. Ward tracks fill rate, shrinkage %, fresh waste % throughout 30,000+ SKUs and compares each store against its own baseline, not against the chain. That is the difference between knowing the store base is fine and knowing which seven stores are not.
At the metric level. Ward tracks SKU productivity (revenue per facing), incremental contribution, substitution patterns, and cluster-level demand elasticity, all weighted against supplier fill rates and promotional obligations.
What the first 90 days
actually look like.
-
01
Week 1: read-only connection
Ward plugs into Snowflake with read-only credentials and begins ingesting any table or view in your Snowflake account and cross-database joins. No config changes on your side. First cards arrive in two days.
-
02
Weeks 2 to 3: baselines
Ward needs roughly two weeks of history per store to separate a real deviation from normal variance. During this window the findings are directionally right and the thresholds are still moving.
-
03
Weeks 4 to 12: steady state
Ward returns cards daily, each with root cause and a recommended action. Volume settles at a level a single person can read over coffee. The measure of success is not how many insight cards arrive, it is how many get acted on.
How Ward connects to Snowflake
Ward queries your Snowflake data warehouse directly. If your retail data lives in Snowflake, Ward reads it without moving or copying anything.
Setup: Ward connects via Snowflake SQL API with key-pair authentication. Read-only warehouse. Your data never leaves Snowflake.
Data Ward reads from Snowflake
Impact metrics with Snowflake
Data lake enrichment
Ward enriches Snowflake data with: Any Snowflake table, Weather & events, Demographics, Competitor data, Custom feeds
Shrinkage costs you more than you think. Ward finds out where.
- ×Shrinkage lands as a year-end surprise
- ×Cannot distinguish theft from spoilage from admin error
- ×High-shrinkage stores only identified during audits
- ×No correlation between operational changes and loss patterns
- ×Exception-based reporting misses slow-bleed patterns
- ✓Store-level shrinkage tracking with cause attribution
- ✓Anomaly detection flags stores deviating from estate average
- ✓Receiving dock discrepancy patterns identified automatically
- ✓Correlation analysis links operational changes to loss shifts
- ✓Trend analysis catches slow-bleed patterns audits miss
US retail shrinkage hit $112.1 billion in 2022. Up 19.4% year over year. Source: National Retail Federation
Grocery KPI impact
Frequently asked questions
Ward analyzes sell-through by store cluster to recommend which SKUs to add, drop, or reallocate. For Grocery retail specifically, Ward monitors 30,000+ SKUs across your stores and delivers automated insight cards with root cause analysis and recommended actions.
Ward tracks Fill rate, Shrinkage %, Fresh waste %, Promo lift, Basket size at the store-category level. Ward clusters stores by demographic, traffic, and sales patterns, then measures SKU performance against cluster benchmarks.
Ward connects via Snowflake SQL API with key-pair authentication. Read-only warehouse. Your data never leaves Snowflake. Data points include: Any table or view in your Snowflake account, Cross-database joins, Historical data at any depth.
Yes. Ward reads Snowflake data and combines it with contextual signals (weather, events, demographics) to generate Grocery-specific insight cards. No custom development required.
Shrinkage costs you more than you think. Ward finds out where. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Store-level shrinkage tracking with cause attribution. Anomaly detection flags stores deviating from estate average. Receiving dock discrepancy patterns identified automatically.
Ward delivers daily insight cards covering Fill rate, Shrinkage %, Fresh waste %, tailored for Loss Prevention decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.
Ward tracks SKU productivity (revenue per facing), incremental contribution, substitution patterns, and cluster-level demand elasticity, all weighted against supplier fill rates and promotional obligations.
A category manager reviews the natural/organic section across 300 stores. Ward's analysis reveals three distinct clusters: urban health-conscious stores that should carry more SKUs, suburban stores that match the national plan, and rural locations where organic moves at a fraction of the estate average. The one-size-fits-all planogram leaves revenue on the table in urban stores while it ties up slow-moving inventory in rural ones.
First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.
No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.
Related solutions
See what Grocery assortment problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.