Assortment Planning for Grocery on BigQuery, built for loss prevention
A grocery Head of LP on BigQuery should not be hunting for assortment problems. Ward pulls forward them each day.
Assortment Planning for Grocery on BigQuery, scoped to loss prevention
Assortment Planning is a insight card type Ward runs continuously. Ward analyzes sell-through by store cluster to recommend which SKUs to add, drop, or reallocate.
A Grocery & Supermarket operator is monitoring 30,000+ SKUs across stores. Fresh availability, shrinkage, and promo effectiveness across hundreds of stores. Ward monitors perishable turn rates and flags waste before it happens.
Shrinkage costs you more than you think. Ward finds out where. Ward raises the indicators that change a loss prevention decision.
The mechanism. Ward clusters stores by demographic, traffic, and sales patterns, then measures SKU performance against cluster benchmarks.
Setup: Service account with BigQuery Data Viewer role. Ward runs read-only SQL queries on your schedule.
Key capabilities
- Store cluster segmentation
- SKU rationalization recommendations
- Whitespace opportunity detection
- Planogram optimization inputs
Chat
Ask anything. Ward routes to the right agent and returns cited answers.
I pulled Store 37’s last 28 days against the chain baseline. Two root causes, both compounding.
| Signal | Finding |
|---|---|
labor_efficiency | Rev/labor-hour −22% vs. cluster, staffing mismatch at 11a–1p peak |
inventory.fresh | Fresh fill 83%, backroom replenishment lag at 2–4p |
promo.lift | BOGO crackers cannibalized Brand Y by 28%, net category +6% |
Recommend: re-baseline Store 37 schedule against true peak, raise replen window to 1p, and review the BOGO before next cycle.
labor_scheduling…
Reporting
Pinned views built from saved data-lake queries. Every number re-derivable from its SQL.
| Model | Horizon | MAPE |
|---|---|---|
holt_winters | 4wk | 4.1% |
arima_sarimax | 13wk | 8.9% |
gbm_demand | 1wk | 2.1% |
bayes_hier | new store | 11.4% |
Sources
Connect external systems to the data lake.
| Name | Type | Last sync |
|---|---|---|
sap_pos_transactions | import | 2m ago |
sap_inventory_shrinkage | import | 2m ago |
sap_labor_scheduling | import | 14m ago |
relex_replenishment_plan | import | 1h ago |
blue_yonder_forecast_daily | import | 1h ago |
retail_fresh_waste_daily | import | 1h ago |
retail_promo_calendar | import | 1h ago |
Policies
Browse and manage Cedar access policies for your tenant.
| Policy ID | Effect | Resources |
|---|---|---|
merch-read-default | permit | Model::* |
lp-read-shrinkage | permit | Model::"inventory_shrinkage" |
vendor-blocked | forbid | Model::"labor_*" |
fresh-team-west | permit | Model::"fresh_waste_daily" |
Why Assortment matters for Grocery retail
Every assortment addition displaces something else, so the real question is incremental contribution after cannibalization and basket effects. Ward clusters stores by demographics, traffic, and competitive set, then benchmarks SKU performance at the cluster level to produce assortment recommendations that go beyond national planograms.
What Ward has eyes on.
Ward keeps a running read on 30,000+ SKUs over your stores, at the store-category level rather than the chain roll-up. The metrics under watch include fill rate, shrinkage %, fresh waste %. A roll-up hides a single-store problem inside a healthy average, which is how fresh waste & spoilage stays invisible for a quarter.
The connection to Google BigQuery is read-only and runs on your schedule. Ward pulls from any BigQuery dataset, gA4 event exports, and the rest of the feed, then stitches together it with external context your Data Platform does not carry: weather, local events, competitor pricing.
Stock what sells. Cut what doesn't. Ward runs the model continuously rather than on a reporting cycle, which is why a finding lands the morning the pattern starts instead of at the end of the period.
At the metric level. Ward tracks SKU productivity (revenue per facing), incremental contribution, substitution patterns, and cluster-level demand elasticity, all weighted against supplier fill rates and promotional obligations.
Why this combination
is its own problem.
A generic assortment model applied to a grocery store base produces alerts nobody trusts. The thresholds are wrong, because grocery baselines are wrong for it. Ward learns the baseline from your own stores instead of importing one.
- 01 Slot fees from CPG vendors lock in SKUs that don't earn their facing, Ward exposes the cost-of-inclusion versus actual revenue per linear foot.
- 02 Cluster definitions based on store size or banner miss the demographic signal; two same-size stores can have completely different shopper profiles.
Benchmarks. A typical grocery store carries 30,000-45,000 SKUs; the bottom 20% generate under 2% of revenue. Cluster-aware assortment usually frees 5-12% of facings without a revenue drop, which translates to space for 1,500-3,000 better-fit SKUs per store cluster.
What the first 90 days
actually look like.
-
01
Week 1: connect
Read-only credentials to Google BigQuery. Ward pulls from any BigQuery dataset, gA4 event exports, ads data transfers and starts building baselines. First insight cards land inside 48 hours, before baselines are stable, so you can see the shape of the output early.
-
02
Weeks 2 to 3: calibration
Baselines stabilize per store and per category. Ward stops flagging normal variance and starts flagging exceptions. This is the window where the false positive rate drops sharply.
-
03
Weeks 4 to 12: operating rhythm
Cards arrive daily and get triaged like any other queue. Most teams find the volume settles into something one person clears in ten minutes. What matters is the action rate, not the alert count.
How Ward connects to Google BigQuery
Ward queries BigQuery using your existing datasets. GA4 exports, POS data, CRM exports. Ward reads it where it lives.
Setup: Service account with BigQuery Data Viewer role. Ward runs read-only SQL queries on your schedule.
Data Ward reads from BigQuery
Impact metrics with BigQuery
Data lake enrichment
Ward enriches BigQuery data with: Any BigQuery dataset, GA4 event exports, Weather & events, Demographics, Custom feeds
Shrinkage costs you more than you think. Ward finds out where.
- ×Shrinkage lands as a year-end surprise
- ×Cannot distinguish theft from spoilage from admin error
- ×High-shrinkage stores only identified during audits
- ×No correlation between operational changes and loss patterns
- ×Exception-based reporting misses slow-bleed patterns
- ✓Store-level shrinkage tracking with cause attribution
- ✓Anomaly detection flags stores deviating from estate average
- ✓Receiving dock discrepancy patterns identified automatically
- ✓Correlation analysis links operational changes to loss shifts
- ✓Trend analysis catches slow-bleed patterns audits miss
US retail shrinkage hit $112.1 billion in 2022. Up 19.4% year over year. Source: National Retail Federation
Grocery KPI impact
Frequently asked questions
Ward analyzes sell-through by store cluster to recommend which SKUs to add, drop, or reallocate. For Grocery retail specifically, Ward monitors 30,000+ SKUs across your stores and delivers automated insight cards with root cause analysis and recommended actions.
Ward tracks Fill rate, Shrinkage %, Fresh waste %, Promo lift, Basket size at the store-category level. Ward clusters stores by demographic, traffic, and sales patterns, then measures SKU performance against cluster benchmarks.
Service account with BigQuery Data Viewer role. Ward runs read-only SQL queries on your schedule. Data points include: Any BigQuery dataset, GA4 event exports, Ads data transfers, Custom ETL outputs.
Yes. Ward reads BigQuery data and combines it with contextual signals (weather, events, demographics) to generate Grocery-specific insight cards. No custom development required.
Shrinkage costs you more than you think. Ward finds out where. Ward solves this with automated insight cards: Store-level shrinkage tracking with cause attribution. Anomaly detection flags stores deviating from estate average. Receiving dock discrepancy patterns identified automatically.
Ward delivers daily insight cards covering Fill rate, Shrinkage %, Fresh waste %, tailored for Loss Prevention decision-making. Each card includes what changed, why it matters, and what to do next.
Ward tracks SKU productivity (revenue per facing), incremental contribution, substitution patterns, and cluster-level demand elasticity, all weighted against supplier fill rates and promotional obligations.
A category manager reviews the natural/organic section across 300 stores. Ward's analysis reveals three distinct clusters: urban health-conscious stores that should carry more SKUs, suburban stores that match the national plan, and rural locations where organic moves at a fraction of the estate average. The one-size-fits-all planogram leaves revenue on the table in urban stores while it ties up slow-moving inventory in rural ones.
First insight cards arrive within 48 hours of data connection. Ward needs approximately 2 weeks to establish stable baselines for your specific operation.
No. Ward sits on top of your existing stack. It is the proactive intelligence layer that watches your data continuously and delivers insight cards, so your team acts on findings instead of hunting for them.
Related solutions
See what Grocery assortment problems Ward catches.
Root causes, not just alerts. See it on your data.
Read-only to start · your LLM keys · SOC 2 Type II underway · or book a call directly
Find out what your data has been hiding.
Tell us about your operation. We’ll show you the problems Ward catches, and the ones your current tools miss.